General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPotenial SCOTUS pick "hearts" who? (You guessed it) BIG BIZ
Yay, just what we need. One more corruptable, corporate loving shill.
http://grist.org/politics/obamas-potential-supreme-court-pick-has-a-shady-history-with-exxonmobil/
Given his participation in these cases, environmentalists and human-right advocates have criticized Srinivasan in the past. In 2013, Marco Simons, the legal director of the nonprofit EarthRights International, wrote a letter to the U.S. Senate raising serious questions about Srinivasans nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals. It read:Mr. Srinivasan built a practice around defending powerful multinational companies against allegations of human rights abuses such as war crimes, torture, and summary execution. He has been one of the principal architects of a legal strategy intended to secure special exemptions for corporations from liability for serious abuses, and which seeks to undermine an important mechanism to enforce international human rights law.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)who generally votes our way except when big bu$ine$$ is involved.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)I would expect centrist. He wants to get through the senate.
onenote
(42,700 posts)Plenty of DUers consider one or both of Kagan and Sotomayor to be "centrists" even though they agree with Ginsburg over 90 percent of the time (as often or more often than Thomas agreed with Scalia to give some point of reference).
Yavin4
(35,438 posts)Are you saying that some people/organizations don't deserve a legal defense? Just because you defend a real terrorist, doesn't make you a terrorist.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)berningman
(144 posts)onenote
(42,700 posts)and has filled well over 1000 other posts ranging from cabinet officials to ambassadorships to agency heads to various advisory commissions and study groups.
And you turn one example into a "tendency".
Wow.