Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 04:05 AM Jun 2012

Single Payer would save billions for MA

http://bostonglobe.com/opinion/2012/05/30/single-payer-health-care-would-save-billions-for-massachusetts/yNTLRlKucgdJCUCU3P5arM/story.html

http://www.healthcare-now.org/single-payer-health-care-would-save-billions-for-massachusetts

The House and Senate health care proposals would set imaginary limits for spending growth enforced by secret “improvement plans” and wrist slaps for hospitals that overcharge; establish tiered payment schemes to consign the poor and middle class to second-tier hospitals and doctors; push most residents of the Commonwealth into HMOs (oops, we forgot, now they’re called “accountable care organizations,” or ACOs); and wipe out small doctor’s offices by “bundling” their pay into ACO payments. Apparently the legislators’ theory is that forcing health care providers to consolidate cuts costs. Oligopoly saves money?

Here are six alternative steps the Legislature could take that would actually save money while still preserving care.

■ Cut out the middlemen. Why exactly do we pay private insurers 10 cents of every premium dollar? The plan that covers all 13 million residents of the Canadian province of Ontario has overhead of only 1 percent. Adopting that single-payer approach in Massachusetts would save about $2 billion in insurance overhead in 2013 alone.

■ Pay hospitals the way we pay fire departments: real global budgets that cover all operating costs, not the per-patient schemes that are masquerading as global payments. Billing, collections, and paperwork consume nearly one quarter of hospitals’ revenues. Eliminate billing for individual patients and you’d cut that nearly in half. The savings: about $3 billion in 2013.

<continued>
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
1. K & R, now multiply x 50. Lets end the oligarchy & let it start with single payer!
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 09:09 AM
Jun 2012

It would be the beginning of true health care vs. rationed death care.

stlsaxman

(9,236 posts)
2. simply freeing employers from health insurance premiums would increase the job market a hundredfold.
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 09:15 AM
Jun 2012

a MediCare Buy-in Option would do that. Am I right?

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
3. But Massachusetts was the very model for the mandatory private insurance scheme...
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 09:16 AM
Jun 2012

Now you say it doesn't work?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Single Payer would save b...