HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » A very revealing article ...

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:52 AM

A very revealing article about the libertarian take over of the Democratic

Party, called "New Democratic Party. The article is from Business Insider.

"The Republican party is not the only party experiencing a grassroots political coup. A new breed of capitalism-loving and urbanized liberals is demanding an entirely new role for the federal government.

"With heavy support from Silicon Valley, these new tech Democrats want the government to embrace economic disruption, with unlimited high-skilled immigrant visas, expansive trade deals, and performance-based funding that encourages charter schools to abandon teacher unions and adopt the management model of a modern startup.

“The replacement of working-class whites with upscale professionals has turned the Democratic coalition into an alliance with a built-in class division," wrote Columbia Journalism Professor and NYT Columnist, Thomas B. Edsall, on the migration of professionals from the Republican party to the Democrats. "While constituting a minority, the relatively upscale wing clearly dominates party policy and provides the majority of the activists who run campaigns, serve as delegates to the convention and have become the core of the party’s donor base.”

More here with charts and more details.

http://www.businessinsider.com/silicon-valley-overhauling-democratic-party-2015-11

The origins of this takeover occurred along with the introduction of that word Progressive instead of liberal for Democratic, also that awful "New Democrat, Third way and left libertarian. These people are not liberal and Hillary has embraced them, they do have all the money and power now.

45 replies, 4009 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 45 replies Author Time Post
Reply A very revealing article about the libertarian take over of the Democratic (Original post)
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 OP
Hydra Nov 2015 #1
Hortensis Nov 2015 #24
pnwmom Nov 2015 #2
Scootaloo Nov 2015 #5
Goblinmonger Nov 2015 #10
Javaman Nov 2015 #16
lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #26
hifiguy Nov 2015 #40
lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #3
TumbleAndJumble Nov 2015 #4
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #18
MisterP Nov 2015 #6
HereSince1628 Nov 2015 #13
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #20
pampango Nov 2015 #7
lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #27
n2doc Nov 2015 #8
djean111 Nov 2015 #9
GoneFishin Nov 2015 #11
KoKo Nov 2015 #12
raouldukelives Nov 2015 #15
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #19
Darb Nov 2015 #14
Javaman Nov 2015 #17
Hortensis Nov 2015 #21
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #22
Hortensis Nov 2015 #23
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #30
Hortensis Nov 2015 #31
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #32
Hortensis Nov 2015 #36
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #41
Hortensis Nov 2015 #44
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #45
FLPanhandle Nov 2015 #25
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #33
hifiguy Nov 2015 #38
Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #28
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2015 #29
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #34
FSogol Nov 2015 #39
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2015 #42
Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #43
KamaAina Nov 2015 #35
hifiguy Nov 2015 #37

Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:11 AM

1. It's part of the GOP meltdown + Dem leaders chasing the money

There's nowhere sane for Business to pour money in the GOP now. The problem with that is that most of us don't support Republican policies...but we're told we have to.

Our party is likely to split at some point if this takeover is not addressed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hydra (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:43 PM

24. Let's damp down the anxiety with a quick little point.

The Democratic Party is running for president:
One moderate liberal,
One left liberal,
One strong left liberal socialist democrat.
NO libertarians, even socially liberal ones, this time around. This means they're not that powerful in our party, much less have taken it over.

Those addicted to panic attacks may want to instead spend some time with THIS reality: The GOP presidential primary is almost entirely made up of candidates vying for the backing of libertarian billionaires. And, although the candidates themselves are not admitting it, most of them are leaning toward economic conservative libertarianism themselves, if they aren't the real thing. Like that scary Kaisich.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:17 AM

2. Hillary has embraced them? Not nearly as much as Bernie. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 02:08 AM

5. Do tell, pnwmom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:25 AM

10. Wait, I thought he was too far left

 

and just was attractive to the young idealists that won't vote?

Now he's too far right in three party and attracting liberal republicans?

You guys gotta keep some consistency in your attacks on Sanders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:46 AM

16. please explain. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 02:49 PM

26. Your belief is that Bernie is pushing for more H1B visas? n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:28 PM

40. What the hell are you smoking?

 

I want to know so I don't accidentally take a hit by mistake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:18 AM

3. By "revealing" I think you meant "depressing". n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #3)


Response to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #3)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:12 PM

18. It is depressing and they stayed so well hidden it took me too long to find them. I am glad they

are finally being brought into the light.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 02:52 AM

6. now, it's not all seasteading freaks--but the DLC was founded to ensure that the party had a steady

supply of money, and that meant pleasing the rich--here, it was the tech and entertainment sectors, plus Wall Street and sectors with a "hi-tech" cachet like Exelon or Monsanto: smart, expert, "pro-science," professional, not fundies saying if the Bible says 2+2=5 they'd believe it or handsy oilmen or rough-handed Hard Hats

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberselfish
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Californian_Ideology

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MisterP (Reply #6)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 09:16 AM

13. That story is part of the DLC official and authorized history...you really believe all that?

The DLC was created to turn southern economic gains into political gains that would mostly serve southern politicians.

That economically based political gain was rooted in policies and practices that had encouraged manufacturing to 'go south', and which by their very nature depended on politically friendliness to corporations and vice versa.

The DLC mostly took advantage of what already existed. They simply pushed the inflation of it from regional party policy to national party policy. And it didn't work so well nationally because the economics were dependent upon between-region economic and political asymmetries that weren't uniformly favorable across the nation.

The exploitation of the asymmetrical economic advantage of taking an industry south which began in the late 50's was almost over when the DLC rode into politics on the glory of the economic rise of the south.. At the time the DLC arose, American industry was already actively looking to create manufacturing colonies outside the country. The big successes of foreign auto and electronics manufacturers having opened their eyes.

Soon after the formal introduction of the DLC, it was very apparent to corporations that the greater asymmetries that would provide much greater profit opportunities were international. Jobs quit going south, they began seriously moving outside US borders. By the end of the Clinton administration, the DLC was deep into the rhetoric and policies of 'globalization'.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #13)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:35 PM

20. That is more deception and it is called "spin" by some and these folks are libertarian liars, none

of them run on, let's reduce wages, instead they talk about letting markets decide. They never oppose the voter disenfranchisement laws called innocently, Voter ID laws, etc.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 07:44 AM

7. I read the OP not as a libertarian takeover, but a tech/big city/urban professional takeover

of the party.

As an example of their growing power, California was once Ronald Reagan territory; but now, the Democratic leadership has taken over big cities, as their base in manufacturing union towns dwindles (think of House Leader Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco, Hillary Clinton from New York, and Barack Obama from Chicago).

On nearly every major battle within the Democratic Party (high skilled immigration, Syrian military intervention, Keystone XL pipeline, and charter schools) education is the dividing line between the capitalism-loving-global-citizen Democrats and regulation-happy-America-first Democrats.

Unlike their capitalism-loving libertarian counterparts, these tech Democrats aren't rabid individualists. They want the government to encourage everyone to maximize their contribution to society by competitively funding citizens to be as educated, entrepreneurial, healthy, and civic as possible.

Traditionally, each political party had had their fear-of-change coalition. Conservatives feared cultural disruption while liberals feared economic disruption. ... That is, psychologically, the same need for certainty that predicts anti-gay attitudes in conservatives also predicts support for wage laws and regulation in liberals

blockquote]
On each of the issues in the graphic, Democrats differ but not dramatically. On 'decreasing Asian immigration' a majority opposes it. On 'free trade is good for Americans' the difference is only 6%, right around 50%). On 'public services should compete', again a majority opposes it. On the Keystone Pipeline, leaders of the party have not supported it, although some unions did.

There are certainly changes in the makeup of the party. If tech and urban professionals had migrated to the republican party, I doubt our party would be stronger today. There always have been changes in the makeup of the party and always will be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pampango (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 02:51 PM

27. I agree. "Libertarian" might not be exactly the right word for it. Anti-worker is better. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 07:54 AM

8. That's not Libertarian. It is crony capitalism

Just aimed at a different set of 'winners'

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:19 AM

9. You got it. Thanks! n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:25 AM

11. Perfect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 09:08 AM

12. ...!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 09:21 AM

15. Yep. A kinder, gentler & more "progressive" fascism. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to raouldukelives (Reply #15)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:13 PM

19. That "kindness" will only last until they gain power.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 09:19 AM

14. What a crock.

 

Those aren't Democrats.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:50 AM

17. libertarians are only that untill they are out of work, then suddenly they are first in line for

unemployment, food stamps and welfare.

they are the children of politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:08 PM

21. The Democratic Party has always had many factions,

including libertarians who lean more liberal socially, rather than libertarians who lean more conservative socially.

If this faction IS gaining more power at this time it's because of the power money gives them. And what's new about business-friendly factions driving most government policy since conservative economic policy took over the nation in the 1980s?

BTW, TRUE libertarians (not those who just pick a few libertarian ideas that sound good and call themselves libertarian) are a dangerous crowd, to almost everyone individually and to a democratic republic. They range from favoring a fairly mild anarchy with some structure (including dog-eat-dog capitalism), to anarchist, to nihilist.

Since the 1970s many wealthy libertarians have been busy dismantling the national structure built over the past century and more. For that, we can blame our own ignorance. No one knew who the Kochs were, for instance, before a year or two ago, yet over those decades we voted thousands of their and their colleagues' choices into office at literally every level and branch of government throughout the nation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hortensis (Reply #21)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:12 PM

22. False equivalency and spin. True the Democrataic once had Dixie Crats and Anti-War, pro and anti

union groups, but they told everyone where they stood. This group has done nothing but hide behind social liberal ideas while promoting with obfuscating language pure libertarian oligarch ideas.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Reply #22)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:28 PM

23. Spin? Yes. Let's CAN that, shall we? It's not correct that

people like Southern Democrats told everyone they were flaming bigots but these particular Silicone Valley-type libertarian-leaners we're talking about pretended they were not just what they were. Both groups are real and part of the party, no matter what they say or don't say.

As for libertarian Democrats, nothing new here except that some extras are coming over from a batshit-crazy GOP, which is a good thing overall. Most of the original Democratic libertarians have been socially liberal and economically libertarian (the latter works out as very conservative). Most of the GOP libertarians have been socially more liberal but economically, again, conservative libertarian.

This all means they were "hiding behind" their own ideology all the time. Which is to say, they're not some evil deceiving group pretending to be "you." They're just another faction of the Democratic Party which, like all the others, believes they have the best answers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hortensis (Reply #23)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:07 PM

30. So according to you inflitering the Democratic party on liberal social issues and hiding their

conservative economic and political beliefs, policies and practices and is fine. Why must they be so dishonest? Why hide who they are until after they are elected? If these are such good ideas why aren't they running for office with them?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Reply #30)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:28 PM

31. Why did any of us choose to "infiltrate" the Democratic Party?

And why do so many here "refuse" to identify themselves as liberals, anti-liberals, left-wing extremists, conservatives of various types, totalitarians of various knee-jerks, Christians, Muslims, fascists, libertarians, Hindus, various socialists, communists, a slew of other labels so academic I can never remember them?

No one owns the Democratic Party, Today's Illusion. There is no litmus test for belonging. It's an organization various peoples join to further goals better pursued in a group instead of individually. Most tend to fall left on at least either economic or social issues, but not necessarily.

Does your "hiding" of where you're truly coming from make you dishonest? Or aren't you hiding a thing? Maybe it's your own business even and you have no duty to explain your ideology any more than you have a duty to disclose your sex, skin color and age, which btw all usually affect ideology.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hortensis (Reply #31)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:12 PM

32. Because you are the same folks pushing "both parties are the same" because you want one party only.

A libertarian nation with absolutely no guaranteed or protected individual rights.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Reply #32)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:22 PM

36. "You"? You are mistaken, Illusion. I am a lifelong

Last edited Mon Nov 16, 2015, 09:11 PM - Edit history (1)

liberal, not a libertarian, and this is the first I've heard of a one-party movement. I wouldn't get all worked up about THAT possibility. Remember the thing about herding cats. We're worse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hortensis (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:06 PM

41. I was responding to your comment, "why did any of us choose to inflitrate the . . . . and thought it

it was a one liner. I have now read it and I am not a philosopher nor am I here in DU for a humanitarian experience. I am here to have a political brawl. And you have no idea how much your comment really does sound like the lefty libertarian fast talklking snake oil selling deceivers, nor how much you mirror the libertarian superiority and condescension. It is not my intention to offend you. I am telling you what I experienced when I read your entire comment. GMO corn meal mush.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Reply #41)

Tue Nov 17, 2015, 12:19 PM

44. Brawl away, then. I think I sounded like a liberal.

We're known for our tolerance of different people and views. I would not grab the Democratic Party for my favorite type even if I could, and not just because it'd be an incredibly stupid thing to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hortensis (Reply #44)

Tue Nov 17, 2015, 12:23 PM

45. It is only my opinion, but you sounded like what a conservative defines as a liberal. I don't know

what you believe, it isn't important for a dialog, we can only respond to what we each type.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:46 PM

25. Lots of people are abandoning the crazy train that is the republicans right now.

Many of those "New Democrats" do have liberal positions though.

They are strong on the environment, are fine with abortion, are not religious, and want decent and affordable schools.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FLPanhandle (Reply #25)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:13 PM

33. Affordable schools that will have no tax support. How are schools going to be affordable with no

minimum wage?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FLPanhandle (Reply #25)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:26 PM

38. But they love and worship

 

trickle-down economics above all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 02:56 PM

28. In a way, this doesn't surprise me. The draw bridge is down & the guards are drunk...

 

With no viable left left (except as it tries to regroup under the rubric of the Sanders'campaign), the half-abandoned old castle of the Party is ripe for any Tom, Dick, and Betty to come in, turn up the volume, crap on the carpet, and declare themselves a fate accompli.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 03:31 PM

29. I've been posting about democrats unwittingly espousing

 

...the libertarian dream economy for weeks!!! These Democrats are too transfixed by their smartphones that they don't understand, even after you explain it too them, that the tech driven gig/sharing economy is driving wages down, replacing full-time jobs with benefits with these glamorized "be your own boss" 1099 jobs. Uber is wreaking havoc on the cab industry at the same time disgruntled Uber drivers are suing Uber nationwide over its business model. Under its current business model, Uber avoids paying into social security and has gamed the tax system by hiding their income in shell companies in the Netherlands and Bahamas.

Airbnb is impacting both housing and smaller hotel industry. In San Francisco, affordable housing is getting squeezed out because landlords can make more money on Airbnbs. While Airbnbs employ no one, they are taking business from smaller hotels that do employ full-time workers. Further, in many cases, Airbnb is another source of income for people with 2 homes. My friends post pictures of the Airbnb they stayed at and they are gorgeous. It's just another redistribution of income from the middle and lower class to the upper class.

Venture capitalists Nick Hanauer made a fortune off his investment in Amazon, but he says "We don't create jobs. Amazon didn't create jobs, it destroyed 1 million jobs."

The very power elite Libertaian Democrats Jeff Bezos, Hollywood agent mogul Ari Emanuel and his brother, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, and Microsoft fuel the gig/sharing economy and they are taking liberal democrats with them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhaTHellsgoingonhere (Reply #29)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:15 PM

34. I agree and the few liberal Democratic still around are going to have to do a lot of shouting and

support Bernie and look closer at the Democratic U.S. Rep and Senate candidates there are already too many of the libertarian ones in office.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhaTHellsgoingonhere (Reply #29)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:27 PM

39. Have you read "The Internet Is Not the Answer" by Andrew Keen?

It is all about the libertarian take over of the economy by the tech firms you mention. Highly recommend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FSogol (Reply #39)

Tue Nov 17, 2015, 08:28 AM

42. Awesome, I'll go find it at Unabridged Bookstore in Lakeview, Chicago

 

...one of the last hanger-one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhaTHellsgoingonhere (Reply #29)

Tue Nov 17, 2015, 11:05 AM

43. Thanks. You reminded men about an earlier crazy scheme, job sharing, the ninties I think.

That so called environmental group that just endorsed Hillary is made up of tech libertarians and all the candidates they have supported are as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:21 PM

35. This battle has already been joined in $iliValley

 

between long-time liberal Rep. Mike Honda (D-CA17) and tech darling Ro Khanna. Thanks to our new top-two primary system, the two of them faced off last November, with Honda winning handily, but Khanna has already made an Ahh-nuld-like "I'll be ba-ack!" statement. Unless, that is, he decides to go for the Central Coast seat that will soon be rendered vacant by Rep. Sam Farr (D-CA20)'s retirement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Todays_Illusion (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:25 PM

37. Repubs who can't abide the jebus-wheezers and xenophobes

 

now call themselves Democrats.

But they made damn sure to bring their Reagan/Thatcher/Friedman economics along with them.

Al From and the Clintons sold the institutional party to them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread