General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Nastiest ad?" Edwards vs. Vitter
Both Chuck Todd last Friday, and Chris Matthews earlier this evening ran that ad with, at least Chuck Todd, referring to it as the nastiest he has ever seen.
In it Edwards compared his call to serve in the military vs. Vitter's call by... prostitution.
I thought it was great.
LiberalArkie
(15,738 posts)pacalo
(24,721 posts)David Vitter chose prostitutes over patriots. Now, the choice is yours.
question everything
(47,590 posts)Yes, it is different but, whatever it takes.
Renew Deal
(81,899 posts)Renew Deal
(81,899 posts)But it's also accurate
wordpix
(18,652 posts)AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)CAG
(1,820 posts)that the repukes have used on Dems for years.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Did Vitter call a Prostitute and miss a vote. Seems to me a factual matter of record. If the truth is ugly so be it.
Oh and fuck Todd, he would never call the ad nasty if you switched the D an R.
Did I mention, fuck Todd.
malaise
(269,292 posts)Remember that always.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)don't miss votes in Congress because you're meeting up with a hooker.
Simple.
GreatCaesarsGhost
(8,585 posts)Vitter was lucky diapers weren't mentioned.
Wounded Bear
(58,777 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and right on the money! Vitter got a pass before on his proclivity for prostitutes, now he doesn't. Boo hoo! Not.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Mendocino
(7,527 posts)Well since it involves Diaper Dave, that sort of "Depends".