Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsisnt saving the environment something to vote for
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/259398-gop-candidates-slam-obama-for-keystone-rejectionReublican presidential candidates are blasting President Obama for rejecting the application to build the Keystone XL Pipeline.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) vowed to approve the project to transport oil sands in Canada to the Gulf Coast if he is elected president.
President Obamas rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline is a huge mistake, and is the latest reminder that this administration continues to prioritize the demands of radical environmentalists over Americas energy security, Rubio said in a statement on Friday. When Im president, Keystone will be approved, and President Obamas backward energy policies will come to an end.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said in a tweet he would allow the pipeline to be built if he wins the 2016 race.
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush called the presidents decision politically motivated and said in a tweet on Friday that it will be a self-inflicted attack on the U.S. economy and jobs.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said the president is once again stopping progress and blocking job creation with the decision, adding in a Friday tweet that the pipeline should be approved.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/259398-gop-candidates-slam-obama-for-keystone-rejectio
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 962 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
isnt saving the environment something to vote for (Original Post)
saturnsring
Nov 2015
OP
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)1. Do they know about the pipeline?
Or are they just for it because the president is against it? I guess I know the answer to that one.
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)2. they will when they get in and big biz comes knockin
Shandris
(3,447 posts)3. Our government just negotiated a multi-year treaty...
...with the most powerful productive nations in the eastern hemisphere without so much as a single nod in the vague, general direction of climate change. Either it's because it doesn't exist, it's not bad enough for them to REALLY worry about, or they've decided to say 'Screw You' and let us all die. I'm willing to bet it likely isn't the first two, either.
Now, which of those three options seems most likely to engender a vote from me? If you answered "None", you get a +1!
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)4. sounds like youre one of the ones saying 'Screw You' and let us all die
my guess is you haven't read it