General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan Bernie Sanders BEAT Hillary Clinton?
Share with Friends......
Sen. Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign has been steadily picking up steam over the past several weeks. After announcing his candidacy for the ...
There's some real energy behind Bernie Sanders now. There's an authenticity about Bernie Sanders, and there's a frustration with the system.
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders will debate six times ...
Wolf Blitzer Baffled by Bernie Sanders' Free College Plan: But What About Hillary?
.
Autumn
(45,138 posts)rec
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)he can win sure hope he does I have no wish to have a DINO running for president. people would rather vote for the Real Republican and I don't want to risk that.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Clinton herself is proof of that. She is working 24/7 for our votes.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But it also has zero bearing on the point being made. Nice you got to slide it in though. Didn't know your position. lol.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... is unelectable.
We may nominate him as totally representing our party, but he will have his ass handed to him in the general.
Bummer we don't have another superstar waiting in the wings. And we do not.
Segami
(14,923 posts)you're just caught up with the noise spin that he's 'unelectable'............Kool-aide for all......we'll eat Ben & Jerry's.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Have we learned nothing in the past 20 years? Have we not observed time and again the crashing and burning of niche candidates who have no appeal outside their small groups? Can you say Howard Dean? And he's just one of a dozen...
daleanime
(17,796 posts)and that's leaving out his popularly with independent and even some republican voters. Our problem as democratic voters is that Bernie's biggest challenge is Hillary, but Hillary's biggest challenge (if she gets pass Bernie) is the general election.
And no I not saying that Bernie would be a slam dunk in the general, no body would be silly enough to say that about their candidate.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I'm on record with my predictions...
daleanime
(17,796 posts)are very far down on the list of my concerns.
Have a great day.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I don't care if you have a great day or not.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)that I have plenty of company.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Visit the Sanders forum. You will feel right at home.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Laser102
(816 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Is it your notion that everyone must factor conventional wisdom (bullshit) into their choice? Fug that.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)What the fuck is it with Sanders supporters? I swear to God you people want everyone to hate you, and you're making that really easy.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)has exactly that message
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I said, "Everyone must factor conventional wisdom into their choice."?
Well, I didn't say it, but you read that into my post.
Great job.
Have the last word.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)You didn't use those words. But what is the meaning of your post, if not heed conventional wisdom?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)What do they say about doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)But, you aren't getting it.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I'll have a double Chocolate Therapy cup with chocolate syrup, caramel, whipped cream and nuts ...
THANK YOU Bernie-Jesus!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,727 posts)She is hugely popular among rank and file Democrats and even more popular among POC and glbtq Democrats who represent about 35% of Democratic primary voters?
The GE is far away but I rather have her hand than the hand of her presumptive Republican opponent, wouldn't you?
I really don't want to discuss Bernie's chances because I am loathe to criticize Democratic office seekers.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I'd love to support her unconditionally, but I cannot. (I support her candidacy, but damn).
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,727 posts)I can't wrap my head around the argument that because Obama beat her Candidate X could. Barack Obama was vital, was Hollywood handsome, was charismatic, and had the blessing of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. When he won IA and demonstrated to our fellow African American Democrats he had crossover appeal they abandoned Hillary in droves. That's what killed her campaign. If she could have even mitigated her losses among African Americans she would have won. As it is she still received nearly 50% of the primary vote.
My concern is the general... I like our hand but not enough to go the proverbial pot on it.
I will not dispute that HRC is a flawed candidate but one thing about the Clintons is they know where the sweet spot is in the electorate and know how to occupy it.
Plus Team Clinton knows negative campaigning. They took poor Bob Dole apart in 1996 when they "made" the unpopular Newt Gingrich his running mate.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I like Bernie; O'Malley has to win me over. My gut is that Clinton is our only chance in the general.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,727 posts)The recent spate of polls give me pause but it's still very, very, very... early and she is still beating her presumptive GOP opponents, albeit by much less than comfortable margins.
I often think how much of the electorate is really in play, probably only five to seven percent, so all the billions that will be spent will be spent to persuade such a small sliver of the electorate, crazy?
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Really took him apart.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,727 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Anonymity + Mob rule = License to mock and attack at will.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,727 posts)In real life , if two people were involved in a conversation and someone barged in and mocked one of those involved in the discussion they run the risk of getting punched in the face. That's why most folks don't willy nilly mock strangers in real life.
I really don't believe that's debatable.
Number23
(24,544 posts)could be half the number of insults these folks toss around daily, all while shrilly screaming how NON thin-skinned they are, Bernie would have had this on lock YESTERDAY.
That man deserves better than these folks. He really does.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)This message brought to you by the progressives who won't be thrown under the bus again.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Do you believe that Obama is a socialist Kenyan, too? I can get you internet articles proclaiming that.
I am not going further with you on this issue. Have the last word.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)So you're putting this poster at the same level as teabaggers?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Another Sanders supporter acting horribly. Welcome to the ever growing club, pal.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Another Hillary supporter acting horribly.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,727 posts)I like Bernie too...
We have an embarrassment of riches in our party.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Hillary isn't going to get the votes of those who are thoroughly disillusioned with the whole system, many of whom are now part of that huge voting bloc, Independents, bigger than either base of either party with a historical 42% - 46% of registered voters.
Bernie will also get the non-voters, equally disgusted with the same old 'politics'. I signed one of them up to register as a Dem this week who hadn't voted for years. She will not, however vote unless Bernie is the candidate.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)So yes she's beatable, she's not destined to win. It's why we have campaigns, to work through all this stuff.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Just sayin.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,727 posts)Is it because they are both politicians?
I wouldn't say some guy in the NBA is a proxy for LeBron James just because they played basketball.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)And unlike Obama, Sanders is actually a socialist (little S).
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)And I've become very cynical because of Obama. Once bitten twice shy.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Crowds are not a good indicator of support or Ron Paul would've handed Mitt Romney his ass in 2012. The fact is, Bernie is still behind both Clinton and Biden in the most recent primary poll - and polling in the range Obama was nowhere near at this point eight years ago.
The RCP average of primary polls has Bernie at an average of 10.8% - with Hillary at 61 (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html).
At this point in 2007, Hillary led with 34.6% of the vote and Obama came in second of their average 23.4 (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html)
That means Hillary is doing 27 points better today than she was in 2007. Sanders is doing 13 points worse than Obama in 2007. That's a difference of 40 points! Even then, Hillary barely lost the nomination to Obama.
Bernie has a lot of ground to make up before people compare him to Obama. Until he gets within fifteen or so points of Hillary, I think anyone who predicts Bernie is a lock to beat Hillary, especially citing Obama, is either purposely trying to fool themselves or are clueless.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)But WE Can!
VOTE For Bernie en masse'. That's all it's gonna take.
Bottom line: It's All up to "us".
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)the bottom line of a successful Grassroots organization And Participation (VOTING).
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)They can "tell us" All sorts of discouraging things...they Can Try to make a Big Huge Scandal out of thin air...But
If "we ain't buying what they're selling" will "it" still make a noise?
azmom
(5,208 posts)Si se puede.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)People are starving for good solid policy.
peecoolyour
(336 posts)And wouldn't feel the need to shoot down the question every single time someone raised it.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Hillary is the favorite at this point, but I think any potential DEM candidate can win the nomination.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)What's wrong with that?
Response to Segami (Original post)
Post removed
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Laser102
(816 posts)It's just that I have burned before and am reluctant to go down the road again. I felt that way about Howard Dean and had my heart broken.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Most all famous children's books are parables or lessons in preparation for adulthood.
Laser102
(816 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,066 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)He can. For variety I suggest you ask next time, "Are we there yet?" In case you can't tell, my tone is friendly.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Party lines.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Auggie
(31,311 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Auggie
(31,311 posts)perhaps this time will be different.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)and I guess my sense of things is a whole lot like the one that causes desperate people to buy lottery tickets: A slim chance is better than none. Anyway, people certainly never resonated to Dennis in the same way they do with Bernie. I think there is something there that takes his case beyond the realm of the statistical and other predictive models, and beyond easy attackability. People may just perceive garbage-type attacks on Bernie as grossly unfair, and they may backfire like that disgusting "Hillary clip" that's probably still making the rounds of the Wingnut Echo Chamber. As for substantive attacks, let the chips fall where they may.
With Bernie, what you see is what you get. There's no not-there there.
Auggie
(31,311 posts)It needs repetition, but with media hand-picking sound bites and conservative parts of the country relying on the six o'clock news for their information, I don't see it happening. Especially when you add in the usual think tank corporate P.R. bullshit used to discredit anything that does get out.
If Clinton can keep it to just one debate it will be plus for her.
I'm hoping I'm wrong Jackpine Radical. It's hard not to be cynical.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)You wanna do something useful?
See what you think of this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128011228
Auggie
(31,311 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Or at the very least, not a democracy that operates only for the corporations, but one that functions for all people.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)The referent for my "their" is the Corporate Media.
My point is that social media & person-to-person contacts are of growing importance, while CM is playing to a diminishing portion of the population for diminishing amounts of time.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Corporate news is for the benefit of the shareholders. To report the truth could damage profitability. They have a fiduciary responsibility to keep their investments safe and telling them truth would be bad for the bottom line.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)of the Corporate State. It makes everything they do so easy to understand.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)he draws large crowds even on short notice. He is not only going to get some support by people who are now okay with Hillary. But, he is going to get new voters. He will get independents. And he will win the general election if he gets the nomination.
Vinca
(50,392 posts)When Hillary is being "natural," she looks impossible to beat, but I'm afraid her campaign handlers shroud her in bubble wrap and try to protect her too much. When they do let her speak it seems overly scripted. She keeps having "conversations" but doesn't seem to converse a whole lot. I love Bernie's passion. He almost doesn't need the big bucks the other campaigns are raising because he makes himself available to anyone at any time to talk about anything . . . no holds barred. You might not agree with him 100%, but I guarantee you know where he stands.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)to get ratings and revenue. If Hillary looks too much like a sure thing nobody is going to tune in.
Too bad the Bernie folks here can't see that.
TAMPABAY
(5 posts)Another thing I think is worth noting, Hillary's leads against the top Republicans aren't what they were a few months ago. The real clear politics averages have her up only 5 against Bush, 4 against Rubio and 3 against Paul. Walker I think was 7. Also, she is polling below 50% in all of the poll aggregates against them. Its early, but I think it wise to question people who say she is a slam dunk win.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html
tritsofme
(17,547 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)He wasn't actually as left as he portrayed himself, of course, and he only positioned himself a few inches to Hillary Clinton's left-- but it was enough to allow a black man with a name that recalled our two biggest national bogeymen of the day to beat the consummate party insider and 'inevitable' winner.
This country is sick of this hyper-polished, focus-group-tested, corporate political process that has become so ridiculously predictable that party insiders on both sides of the aisle regularly end up in elections with the barest slivers victory margins. That's how tired and stagnant this crap has become-- and people are rejecting it.
N_E_1 for Tennis
(9,921 posts)we have been searching for a candidate that represents the middle class for decades.
We were entranced by Mr. Obama, we thought this was change and hope.
While a great deal of greatness was done by him, he represents the 1%.
We have sat on the sidelines and watched, commented upon the unrest in other countries that dismissed the middle. We cheered for them. We wrote opinions about why this change can't happen here, while we wished it could.
We railed about corporate control, no paying of taxes, complete disregard for employees, and on and on and on.
Now, with a candidate that shouts our opinions, backs them up by facts, runs a clean campaign, we return to the fucking establishment. Some want to embrace a person that is the epitome of what is wrong with this country.
We cheer the things that Bernie espouses. We all want it. Not only here as very loyal Dems, but I see his word resonating across all political and social spectrums.
Yes, Bernie can win. He probably should. He should if we stand by the convictions we hold so dear in our hearts.
Only you, only you, can make the change.
You are one, but your voice reaches many, those voices reach more. Spread the word, use any outlet you can. Get this agenda out to the majority.
EOR. End of rant.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)He's a rolling stone. Get out of his way.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)And We the People with him.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Not likely though.
He certainly can't if he continues to pull stupid stunts like he just did with the patriot act vote.
Sure there will be a lot of suckers that buy the shuck and jive just like they bought Edwards nonsense. Amazingly the general electorate tends to see through the film flam men.
I had high hopes for Bernie but that cloture vote opened my eyes to the reality behind the mask.
He has a big hill to climb to beat the Clinton machine he is not going to get there by pulling stunts.His brand is his supposed principles. Hard to take that seriously when he betrays them so openly.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Good luck
brooklynite
(95,421 posts)...it's because they're smart enough (usually) to know that there's a lot more to winning than having a compelling message. They need to identify specific demographic chunks of the electorate in specific states and expend resources to compell those voters to actually vote. Dean had great crowds at his rallies, but most voters don't go to rallies, and even if they were willing to, the candidates date can't do retail campaigning with most of them. That means paid staff on the ground, and advertising in large states. Nobody's pointed to a set of States that Bernie should target to win 2000-odd delegates, or explained where he'll get the funancial resources to compete in them.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)And of course he can win. It requires enough votes. There is no natural barrier to Bernie getting the office.
--imm
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)and you've got a post from 8 years ago.