HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Sanders, unlike anyone el...

Sun May 31, 2015, 10:45 AM

Sanders, unlike anyone else running, voted for the 1994 Violent Crime Control & Law Enforcement Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violent_Crime_Control_and_Law_Enforcement_Act

This act banned assault weapons, greatly increased the number of police on the streets and their power, expanded mandatory minimum sentences, and vastly expanded the war on drugs.

Sanders voted for it.

Clinton didn't vote for it, because she was not in Congress. She was First Lady, and she advocated for it, using a quote that is currently a high-rated OP.

O'Malley didn't vote for it, because he was a Baltimore city council member at that point. But later as mayor and governor he enforced it.

That said, one and only one person running for the Democratic nomination today voted for this expansion of police powers and incarceration, and that person was now-Senator Sanders.

23 replies, 14196 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 23 replies Author Time Post
Reply Sanders, unlike anyone else running, voted for the 1994 Violent Crime Control & Law Enforcement Act (Original post)
Recursion May 2015 OP
Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #1
Recursion May 2015 #2
Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #21
Wilms May 2015 #11
peecoolyour May 2015 #3
LWolf May 2015 #4
cali May 2015 #5
Recursion May 2015 #6
DanTex May 2015 #13
OKNancy May 2015 #7
AzDar May 2015 #8
Recursion May 2015 #9
hollowdweller May 2015 #10
Motown_Johnny May 2015 #12
Recursion May 2015 #14
ucrdem May 2015 #19
JDPriestly May 2015 #23
DanTex May 2015 #15
joeybee12 May 2015 #16
Sancho May 2015 #17
nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #18
HooptieWagon May 2015 #20
JDPriestly May 2015 #22

Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 10:49 AM

1. Kinf of nit-picky, given that you admit Clinton advocated for it, but ok.

Congrats, you've found another reason to bolster your choice to vote for Clinton instead of Sanders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #1)

Sun May 31, 2015, 10:52 AM

2. I'm leaning O'Malley

I love how you just make up this idea that I'm a Clinton supporter. Does that make things easier for you, to just imagine what other people think?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Reply #2)

Sun May 31, 2015, 04:17 PM

21. My apologies. That makes more sense anyway.

You slammed both Bernie and Hillary, after all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #1)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:40 AM

11. Recursion has been making this specious argument all day.

 

Whatever is up with that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 10:53 AM

3. Here's some more votes and stances he has taken on the issue of criminal justice,

 

so we have the full picture:

Voted YES on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons.
Voted NO on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime.
Voted YES on maintaining right of habeas corpus in Death Penalty Appeals.
Voted NO on making federal death penalty appeals harder.
Voted YES on replacing death penalty with life imprisonment.

Rated 78% by CURE, indicating pro-rehabilitation crime votes.
More funding and stricter sentencing for hate crimes.
Require DNA testing for all federal executions.
Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/Bernie_Sanders_Crime.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to peecoolyour (Reply #3)

Sun May 31, 2015, 10:55 AM

4. I like the full picture. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:00 AM

5. pathetic. he voted for an assault weapons ban

 

And lookie lookie who's pushing this crap, why the Cameron's who were screeching that he was responsible for thousands of deaths because he was against gun control.


Here's more on that legislation: it provided funds for prison services, alternative sentencing for juveniles, increased sentences for sexual offenders and increased assistance to victims of sexual assault.
http://ballotpedia.org/Bernie_Sanders_presidential_campaign,_2016?gclid=Cj0KEQjw4qqrBRDE2K_z7Pbvjo8BEiQA39AImQwYM9Hxx-ert__ZI5KhSgjjAbmdYzGN_tWFoB3nGj8aAnNC8P8HAQ

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Bernie_Sanders_Crime.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #5)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:01 AM

6. And Clinton advocated *for the same bill* and is being excoriated for it here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6750883

Sorry, fair is fair. I didn't start this, Cali.

Christ, I'm not even a Clinton supporter and this shit is making me stand up for her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #5)

Sun May 31, 2015, 12:00 PM

13. Pathetic? LOL. Actually this OP is a response to the 70+ rec OP that is bashing Hillary for

supporting the exact same bill that Bernie voted for. If there's a better definition of "hypocrisy" than complaining about this while bashing Hillary for supporting precisely the same thing, I haven't come across it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:02 AM

7. This is kind of funny

Here is the deal... a lot of things have changed since 1994.
Sanders and Hillary Clinton are both allowed to change their views as society changes.

What's that expression? “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines."

I get what you are trying to point out here. It's kind of hypocritical for some people to pull out old votes, views or stances from 20,30 or even 40 years ago and write: neener neener, your candidate is xxxx

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:03 AM

8. Isn't this your second post on the SAME subject matter this fine a.m. or does it just SEEM that way?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AzDar (Reply #8)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:06 AM

9. The limit comes later in the primary season, judging by 2008

I was just appalled by the Kafka-esque nature of an OP lambasting Clinton for supporting a bill that Sanders actually voted for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:35 AM

10. Situation was difft back then.

 


Crime rate was higher. We'd just been going thru the crack epidemic.

Republicans were painting democrats as soft on crime, buzzwords about criminals "Getting off on a Technicality". Police with their "hands tied behind their back" "Liberal Judges" letting criminals off. Right before Clinton, Bush had kicked Dukakis ass using Willie Horton ads about a criminal set free to create crime again and highlighting Dukakis being a member of the ACLU which is code word for being soft on crime.

Dems responded by getting tougher on crime. We can argue the reasons but the crime rate has drastically fallen, but more police and stricter enforcement is at least part of it.

However just like the cutting of taxes and regulations, that helped with inflation and the economy, back then situations change. You just can't keep doing the same thing over and over when your problems are different and expect no negative results.

It's the republicans who are wedded to ideology and unable to be flexible in legislation when conditions require difft actions, not democrats.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 11:56 AM

12. So (D)s are now against banning assault weapons?

 

I guess I missed that memo.

Also missed out on the fact that we are against the Violence Against Women Act and the Driver's Privacy Protection Act.

Silly me. I will try to pay closer attention.



For the sarcasm impaired >>------->



This is a crazy argument. There were bad things in that bill, there were good things in that bill. With 20 years of hindsight it is easy to attack that vote. I think both Hillary and Bernie supporters should just let this one go. There are plenty of real arguments to be had, we don't need to resort to this.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #12)

Sun May 31, 2015, 12:03 PM

14. Exactly, thank you

It's crazy to charge either Clinton or Sanders for supporting it. But somehow this defense only comes out for Sanders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Reply #14)

Sun May 31, 2015, 12:24 PM

19. Odd isn't it.

And from the crowd that doesn't do loyalty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Reply #14)

Sun May 31, 2015, 04:24 PM

23. I'm unaware that anyone has criticized Hillary for her gun control policies.

Do you have links to posts criticizing her on that account? I don't think it is from the Sanders side. Please provide links.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 12:04 PM

15. Yup. A tale of two DUs.

OP: Hillary supported the 1994 Crime Bill
DU: Rec! She's Horrible! Mass incarceration is all her fault!

OP: Bernie supported the 1994 Crime Bill
DU: Unrec! How dare you! Times were different back then! It's not a simple issue!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 12:04 PM

16. Too bad...most of DU has blinders these days and can't admit

 

There are some things Bernie did wrong...he's the latest DU God, not a human, just like Liz until it finally hit home that she wasn't running...it's pretty amusing seeing the responses from Bernie's true believers...I'm just glad Bernie has a thicker skin than his supporters do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 12:14 PM

17. Bernie also has not been a progression on gun manufacturer and control legislation...

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html

But before liberal Democrats flock to Sanders, they should remember that the Vermont senator stands firmly to Clinton’s right on one issue of overwhelming importance to the Democratic base: gun control. During his time in Congress, Sanders opposed several moderate gun control bills. He also supported the most odious NRA–backed law in recent memory—one that may block Sandy Hook families from winning a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the gun used to massacre their children.

But his voting record paints the picture of a legislator who is both skeptical of gun control and invested in the interests of gun owners—and manufacturers. In 1993, then-Rep. Sanders voted against the Brady Act, which mandated federal background checks for gun purchasers and restricted felons’ access to firearms. As a senator, Sanders supported bills to allow firearms in checked bags on Amtrak trains and block funding to any foreign aid organization that registered or taxed Americans’ guns. Sanders is dubious that gun control could help prevent gun violence, telling one interviewer after Sandy Hook that “if you passed the strongest gun control legislation tomorrow, I don’t think it will have a profound effect on the tragedies we have seen.”
------------------
Unlike the 1994 Act, this is one bill that is difficult to understand after Sandy Hook.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 12:19 PM

18. More popcorn

 



Quietly munches on it. Entertaining.

(And instead of looking at one vote, people should be looking at the whole policy that has led to mass incarceration and where these people are. And I mean every clown running, I don't care what letter is behind their name.)

Now pass more of this

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 02:26 PM

20. It banned assault weapons. Thank you for pointing out he is the only candidate to vote for that.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Original post)

Sun May 31, 2015, 04:21 PM

22. Desperate attempt to find something wrong with Bernie Sanders.

And it is a big fail.

Bernie Sanders opposes the for-profit prison system.

In 1994, we needed more money in law enforcement. Today, we need fewer people in prison.

And what we need least of all are for-profit prisons.

I'm with Bernie on this one.

And getting rid of AK-47s? Who needs them? You don't use them to hung. They couldn't do much to defend against a drone. They are basically dangerous playthings. I don't want them in my neighborhood. I don't want them next door to my grandchildren. They serve no purpose outside of a military context. Maybe some police forces need them in case of an invasion. That's about it.

I'm with Bernie on this one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread