Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(68,644 posts)
Sat Dec 24, 2011, 10:49 AM Dec 2011

I watched a special on Current TV about Julian Assange and about WikiLeaks....

Julian came of as a bit of an ass in it. I was surprised by his behavior, but also encouraged by the way it's become a decentralized movement.

There's a new offering launched by his former associate, Daniel Domscheit-Berg (pictured below), called OpenLeaks: http://www.openleaks.org/

And there are other spinoffs, like Cryptome: http://cryptome.org/

Like OWS, the movement abhors centralized power, so Julian will become a bit of history.

Here's a story from "Wired" about Assange's maniacal treatment of his crew:

WikiLeaks Threatens Its Own Leakers With $20 Million Penalty

By Kevin Poulsen Email Author
May 11, 2011

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange now makes his associates sign a draconian nondisclosure agreement that, among other things, asserts that the organization’s huge trove of leaked material is “solely the property of WikiLeaks,” according to a report Wednesday.

“You accept and agree that the information disclosed, or to be disclosed to you pursuant to this agreement is, by its nature, valuable proprietary commercial information,” the agreement reads, “the misuse or unauthorized disclosure of which would be likely to cause us considerable damage.”

The confidentiality agreement (.pdf), revealed by the New Statesman, imposes a penalty of 12 million British pounds– nearly $20 million — on anyone responsible for a significant leak of the organization’s unpublished material. The figure is based on a “typical open-market valuation” of WikiLeaks’ collection, the agreement claims. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/05/nda-wikileaks/

Fucking edited to fucking add the URL goddammit. Why with all the new fucking bells and whistles must DU3 force a post with a fucking correction to bear the red lettered mark of shame for having edited, huh???
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I watched a special on Current TV about Julian Assange and about WikiLeaks.... (Original Post) NYC_SKP Dec 2011 OP
I too hate the "red lettered mark of shame" because it opens private embarrassments to the public. phasma ex machina Dec 2011 #1
And thus discourages carefully crafted posts. NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #2
Happy holidays back at you. phasma ex machina Dec 2011 #3


(68,644 posts)
2. And thus discourages carefully crafted posts.
Sat Dec 24, 2011, 11:06 AM
Dec 2011

Most of us want to use html correctly and follow basic rules, including providing sources.

But I almost didn't edit the post because of that awful red lettering, a feature I'd hope would be eliminated.

Ah well, better that the post has the link to the Wired article.

Happy Holiday, phasma ex machina!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I watched a special on Cu...