Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(1,190 posts)
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 05:40 PM Mar 2015

A question re:9/11 (not a truther honest question)

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by uppityperson (a host of the General Discussion forum).

OK over the last few years I've read /watched everything that has to do with 9/11, I still end up with one nagging question which is the original P.N.A.C. document by the heritage foundation ie: Bush boys et.al. regarding the coincidence of this document being written several years earlier than 9/11 among other coincidentally questionable phrases is,The main way to obtain the consent of the people it would take a Dec.7th type of attack then low and behold 9/11, I am not a truther but I would love to find a answer to this one nagging question I keep asking myself , Can this really be a coincidence?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A question re:9/11 (not a truther honest question) (Original Post) ruffburr Mar 2015 OP
I think 9/11 will be like Pearl Harbor and JFK upaloopa Mar 2015 #1
no! not IMO. n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #2
Perhaps if Jeb runs Politicalboi Mar 2015 #3
I still find it odd that there was an exercise thecrow Mar 2015 #4
There are lots of nagging questions. They will remain because we were never told the truth. villager Mar 2015 #5
Yes. Coincidences happen. phil89 Mar 2015 #6
Oh dear. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #7
Locking as does not meet GD SOP. uppityperson Mar 2015 #8


(11,417 posts)
1. I think 9/11 will be like Pearl Harbor and JFK
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 05:47 PM
Mar 2015

assassination with lingering questions and different "experts" writing books and movies with various new facts and conspiracy theories from now until the end if time.



(13,382 posts)
2. no! not IMO. n/t
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 05:50 PM
Mar 2015


(15,189 posts)
3. Perhaps if Jeb runs
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 05:55 PM
Mar 2015

Some gutsy reporter will ask him about PNAC. PNAC is as coincidental as the 2.3 TRILLION gone missing at the Pentagon and announced on 09/10/01, then ALL the paperwork to find that money is attacked and gone forever. My question would be How come we only get one blurry video of the attack at our biggest DEFENSE building and nobody seems to think that is odd. Or that the Pentagon got hit 40 minutes AFTER the second tower, and the Pentagon did NOTHING to protect itself or D.C.


(5,519 posts)
4. I still find it odd that there was an exercise
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 06:13 PM
Mar 2015

that had a plane crash into the Pentagon. Was it scheduled for 9-11?
Is that why the jets were so slow in coming?
Why the pilots asked , "IS THIS REAL TIME?"

And Condi saying "Who could have imagined that jets would crash into buildings?"...

I think it will ever be like JFK or Area 51 in the legends of conspiracy.



(26,001 posts)
5. There are lots of nagging questions. They will remain because we were never told the truth.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 06:15 PM
Mar 2015

What I mean by that -- rather than advocate any particular theory here -- is that there were no committees immediately set up in Congress to investigate what happened. (Unlike previous national catastrophes).

When a committee was belatedly set up, certain people were allowed to testify not-under-oath. Many lines of questioning were restricted. Etc., etc.

No one has been allowed to get at the truth, whatever it might be. For whatever reason -- conspiracy, protection of the Saudis, you name it -- it continues to be a whitewash.

So reasonable people will, reasonably, continue to have questions.



(1,043 posts)
6. Yes. Coincidences happen.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 06:30 PM
Mar 2015




(16,184 posts)
7. Oh dear.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 06:33 PM
Mar 2015


(115,687 posts)
8. Locking as does not meet GD SOP.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 07:08 PM
Mar 2015

Statement of Purpose

Discuss politics, issues, and current events. Posts about Israel/Palestine, religion, guns, showbiz, or sports are restricted in this forum. Conspiracy theories and disruptive meta-discussion are forbidden. For more information, click here.

Consider reposting in Creative Speculation.

Statement of Purpose

Discuss conspiracy theories and other highly-speculative topics. Free-thinkers and skeptics are both welcome. When posting, please be mindful of the DU Terms of Service.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A question re:9/11 (not a...