General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOrrex
(63,209 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Orrex
(63,209 posts)I can't keep my Turoks straight.
It's tricky Turok a rhyme, Turok a rhyme that's right on time
It's Tricky
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)we salute you!
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,978 posts)Revanchist
(1,375 posts)Do a google image search for Lois Lane I am curious black
Can find that one plus many more on the Superman is a dick website http://www.superdickery.com/
randome
(34,845 posts)It was often presented in a heavy-handed way but still an important development in our culture during and post-WWII that we seem to have forgotten.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
brooklynite
(94,541 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)Doesn't make it a bad thing.
Revanchist
(1,375 posts)With the existence of actual gods, aliens, and immortal beings. Then again they also have demons and angels so perhaps the Abrahamic "God" is real in these universes. Not sure about Jesus though, I haven't kept up with comics for over 20 years now.
Hekate
(90,677 posts)...on occasion, but not "Jesus" or "Mary." Yes, the god was the Abrahamic god, which in the US at the time meant Protestants, Catholics, and Jews. The details were considered to be something people elaborated on inside their churches and synagogues, not in the public square.
Using the terms "God" and "Creator" was assumed to be inclusive of all who believed in deities (Hindus, Buddhists, et al.) and was thought to be courteous.
Revanchist
(1,375 posts)could there be atheists or agnostics in a comic book universe? You could still chose whether or not to actively worship the deity of your choosing, but could you still claim that you don't believe in the existence of God? Or is like the Supernatural Universe where the truth is not common knowledge so atheism would still be common place?
I've been watching the series Constantine on Hulu plus and he's working for God with an angel advisor (of sorts) fighting the rising darkness but while he knows God exists, he sort of despises Him, since God won't take an active role in preventing suffering and evil. In the real world where magic doesn't exist I would see him questioning the existence of God, if not stating that God doesn't exist but since he's in the DC universe, he has no doubt in the existence, but he's no worshiper.
ismnotwasm
(41,978 posts)God doesn't play an active roll, but various demons, as well as satan, do. It digs a bit into whether satan was the original fallen or not (he wasn't, and there's a short comic series called "Lucifer" about the one who was)
No, Constantine is no fan of God, but for the first decade of the comic, he's an anti hero who wants to save humanity from demonic forces. In other words, he's not relying on God to do anything, and frequently questions why HE even tries.
DinahMoeHum
(21,786 posts). . .so your comment is indeed nit-picky.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Response to riqster (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
rpannier
(24,329 posts)spooky3
(34,451 posts)Else's clothes or hair is affected?
riqster
(13,986 posts)mucifer
(23,542 posts)on the radio that bashed the kkk and actually did some real damage to the organization. Not to mention every few minutes on the show kids were told the klansmen are cowards.:
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)mrmpa
(4,033 posts)sometime after WWII, there were radio episodes where Superman fought for union members and WWII veterans against management. Heard them on satellite radio station 82 within the past few months.
Phil1934
(49 posts)who illegally entered the US
riqster
(13,986 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)The somehow would probably be being humanoid at all.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)He was, in effect, a socialist.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Was this the comic book or are there any radio shows with these themes?
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...when Superman was created, there in the midst of the depression; he didn't find a publisher till 1938, and the sentiments of his poor creators, formed over those five years trying to sell him, were clear in those early issues. Of course, they'd invent a hero to save the poor and vulnerable from all kinds of abusersthe same ones that they'd seen abusing their own family and friends, including robbers and bankers (one in the same, in most cases).
Clark Kent, after all, was a man of the people. As well as journalist exposing injustices and corruption.
But then WWII arrived and Supermanall Superheroes invented in the few years after Superman appearedwere needed to fight Nazis and the Hirohito. This was when the radio show came to the fore. So I'd be doubtful that the radio shows had much of those early socialist themes in them. Though I could be wrong about that. They did put on shows right out of the comic book and comic strip. And I haven't listened to many such nor do I know much about them.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)What I love is that in the 30's, in popular culture, a super macho hero could have socialist leanings. Not like the Schwarzenegger's of today.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...as been equally popular ever since. He is the epitome of the trickle down myth. A billionaire who not only shares his wealth and makes the city better with money, but uses it to personally fight crime. In between enjoying all the toys, mansion, sexy women and butler money can buy
Batman fans (and don't get me wrong, I like him fine), will say that he's "more real" than Superman because Superman is invulnerable, etc. But if you think about it, Superman is more "real" to their experience than Batman. As Clark Kent, he had ordinary parents who worked hard and raised him well--average home, no servants, family meals in the kitchen, chores to do. He lived in an ordinary town, went to a public school, was picked on, had a crush on the popular girl who didn't notice him. In his current job he gets yelled at by the boss, is overworked and underpaid, and is usually ignored and disrespected by co-workers.
...until, of course, he takes the glasses off and becomes Superman. Even as Superman he shows his every-man roots by fighting 1% Lex Luthor.
He might not have to to be afraid of a bullet killing him, but then, logically, neither does Batman who is a popular fictional character and will never be really killed off. Realism in a superhero, I think, is in who they are when not fighting crime, and what criminals they choose to fight and how. Not in whether they can be physically harmed.
End of Rant
zentrum
(9,865 posts)It's really interestingthe archetype of Clark Kent combined with this heroism. And how Batman has none of thathe's an "icon" in or out of cape.
Thanx.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)Like a cop. And like a cop he gets to scare them, beat them up, and "avenge" the victims. So that makes him very appealing to readers who feel the world has beaten them up. Superman, interestingly, started out that way. He was not nice and he was scary to the bullies. But he became more of a fireman battling the bigger forces that match his powers. His aim was usually to rescue trapped people or stop a disaster...then go after the criminal behind it.
Given his powers, especially his invulnerability to harm, his heroism becomes less about what he's risking and more about being moral even though it would be very easy for him to be very immoral. It's in maintaining his humanity when he's not human and doesn't have to act human. This is a more difficult heroism for readers (and writers!) to identify with because it involves flying protectively over everyone, but never looking down on them. The man with a lot of power brutally avenging victims by beating up or killing off bad guys is a far easier meme.
Behind the Aegis
(53,956 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)spanone
(135,831 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)I watched the old Superman show religiously as a kid. It also had Lois Lane as an independent, hard-driving, professional woman. Quite progressive for its time.