Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 09:30 PM Mar 2015

Warren: "ISDS is a bad deal for America" (TPP Petition)

(In today's Email, from Elizabeth Warren):



The United States is in the final stages of secret, closed-door negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a massive trade agreement with 11 other countries.

Who will benefit from it? One provision hidden in the fine print – “Investor-State Dispute Settlement” – may sound harmless, but don’t let that fool you: ISDS could let foreign companies challenge US laws without ever stepping in an American court.

That would undermine US sovereignty and tilt the playing field even further in favor of multinational corporations.

Sign my petition and spread the word: ISDS is a bad deal for America.

Here’s how ISDS would work: Imagine that the United States bans a toxic chemical that is often added to gasoline because of its health and environmental consequences. If a foreign company that makes the toxic chemical opposes the law, it would normally have to challenge that regulation in a US court.

But with ISDS, the company could skip the US courts and go before an international panel of arbitrators. If the multinational company won, the ruling couldn’t be challenged in US courts, and the arbitration panel could require American taxpayers to cough up millions – and even billions – of dollars in damages.

If that seems shocking, buckle your seat belt. ISDS could lead to gigantic fines, but it wouldn’t employ independent judges. Instead, highly paid corporate lawyers would go back and forth between representing corporations one day and sitting in judgment the next. Really.

And if the tilt toward giant corporations wasn’t clear enough, consider who would get to use this special court: only international investors, which are, by and large, giant corporations. So if a Vietnamese company with US operations wanted to challenge our refusal to import a dangerous chemical, it could use ISDS. But if an American labor union or human rights group believed Vietnam was allowing Vietnamese companies to pay slave wages in violation of trade commitments, the American labor group would have to make its case in the Vietnamese courts – and if an environmental group thought the Vietnamese company was dumping waste in their rivers in violation of the new trade agreement, they would have to go to a Vietnamese court as well. In other words, the great deal for corporations is only for corporations – everyone else is left out.

Giving foreign corporations special rights to challenge our laws outside of our legal system would be a bad deal for America. Sign my petition to say no to ISDS.

Opposing ISDS isn’t a partisan issue – even your Tea Party relatives should be worried about this dangerous provision:

Conservatives who believe in US sovereignty should be outraged that ISDS would shift power from American courts, whose authority is derived from our Constitution, to unaccountable international tribunals.
Libertarians should be offended that ISDS effectively would offer a free taxpayer subsidy to countries with weak legal systems.
And progressives should oppose ISDS because it would allow big multinational corporations to weaken labor and environmental rules.

If a final TPP agreement includes Investor-State Dispute Settlement, the only winners will be multinational corporations. Join me in saying No to ISDS.

Thank you for being a part of this,

Elizabeth















http://my.elizabethwarren.com/page/s/isds?source=20150316emb


(I signed it.)


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren: "ISDS is a bad deal for America" (TPP Petition) (Original Post) Faryn Balyncd Mar 2015 OP
Signed, Kicked, & Recommended (nt) Autumn Colors Mar 2015 #1
Signed of course, but I have to wonder why our party leaders are selling us out for this travesty Dragonfli Mar 2015 #2
K&R Signed Thespian2 Mar 2015 #3
Kick n/t Oilwellian Mar 2015 #4
K&R.... daleanime Mar 2015 #5
K&R Michigan-Arizona Mar 2015 #6
K&R woo me with science Mar 2015 #7
Signed. djean111 Mar 2015 #8

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
2. Signed of course, but I have to wonder why our party leaders are selling us out for this travesty
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:57 PM
Mar 2015

I mean, what on earth could be so valuable to them that they would do that.
How much money can they hope to receive once out of office and what kind of sociopath would consider any amount worth such harm to so many innocent people?

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
3. K&R Signed
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 11:05 PM
Mar 2015

Sorry that Americans have to go to such lengths just to keep TPP from destroying both America and Canada.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
8. Signed.
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 06:59 AM
Mar 2015

And for those who say that this sort of thing already exists, no big deal - looks like this doubles down, plus it seems to me that the corporations have gotten much more bold these days.
Oh, and China is not going to be stopped from doing anything, and I doubt the rules are enforced much these days, anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warren: "ISDS is a b...