Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWarren: "ISDS is a bad deal for America" (TPP Petition)
(In today's Email, from Elizabeth Warren):The United States is in the final stages of secret, closed-door negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a massive trade agreement with 11 other countries.
Who will benefit from it? One provision hidden in the fine print Investor-State Dispute Settlement may sound harmless, but dont let that fool you: ISDS could let foreign companies challenge US laws without ever stepping in an American court.
That would undermine US sovereignty and tilt the playing field even further in favor of multinational corporations.
Sign my petition and spread the word: ISDS is a bad deal for America.
Heres how ISDS would work: Imagine that the United States bans a toxic chemical that is often added to gasoline because of its health and environmental consequences. If a foreign company that makes the toxic chemical opposes the law, it would normally have to challenge that regulation in a US court.
But with ISDS, the company could skip the US courts and go before an international panel of arbitrators. If the multinational company won, the ruling couldnt be challenged in US courts, and the arbitration panel could require American taxpayers to cough up millions and even billions of dollars in damages.
If that seems shocking, buckle your seat belt. ISDS could lead to gigantic fines, but it wouldnt employ independent judges. Instead, highly paid corporate lawyers would go back and forth between representing corporations one day and sitting in judgment the next. Really.
And if the tilt toward giant corporations wasnt clear enough, consider who would get to use this special court: only international investors, which are, by and large, giant corporations. So if a Vietnamese company with US operations wanted to challenge our refusal to import a dangerous chemical, it could use ISDS. But if an American labor union or human rights group believed Vietnam was allowing Vietnamese companies to pay slave wages in violation of trade commitments, the American labor group would have to make its case in the Vietnamese courts and if an environmental group thought the Vietnamese company was dumping waste in their rivers in violation of the new trade agreement, they would have to go to a Vietnamese court as well. In other words, the great deal for corporations is only for corporations everyone else is left out.
Giving foreign corporations special rights to challenge our laws outside of our legal system would be a bad deal for America. Sign my petition to say no to ISDS.
Opposing ISDS isnt a partisan issue even your Tea Party relatives should be worried about this dangerous provision:
Conservatives who believe in US sovereignty should be outraged that ISDS would shift power from American courts, whose authority is derived from our Constitution, to unaccountable international tribunals.
Libertarians should be offended that ISDS effectively would offer a free taxpayer subsidy to countries with weak legal systems.
And progressives should oppose ISDS because it would allow big multinational corporations to weaken labor and environmental rules.
If a final TPP agreement includes Investor-State Dispute Settlement, the only winners will be multinational corporations. Join me in saying No to ISDS.
Thank you for being a part of this,
Elizabeth
http://my.elizabethwarren.com/page/s/isds?source=20150316emb
(I signed it.)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1094 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (26)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren: "ISDS is a bad deal for America" (TPP Petition) (Original Post)
Faryn Balyncd
Mar 2015
OP
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)1. Signed, Kicked, & Recommended (nt)
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)2. Signed of course, but I have to wonder why our party leaders are selling us out for this travesty
I mean, what on earth could be so valuable to them that they would do that.
How much money can they hope to receive once out of office and what kind of sociopath would consider any amount worth such harm to so many innocent people?
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)3. K&R Signed
Sorry that Americans have to go to such lengths just to keep TPP from destroying both America and Canada.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)4. Kick n/t
daleanime
(17,796 posts)5. K&R....
allthough I'm sure that there are other surprises buried in there.
Michigan-Arizona
(762 posts)6. K&R
Signed for both myself & hubby.........
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)7. K&R
djean111
(14,255 posts)8. Signed.
And for those who say that this sort of thing already exists, no big deal - looks like this doubles down, plus it seems to me that the corporations have gotten much more bold these days.
Oh, and China is not going to be stopped from doing anything, and I doubt the rules are enforced much these days, anyway.