Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

meow2u3

(24,774 posts)
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 03:08 PM Feb 2015

Boehner Confesses: I Invited Netanyahu Secretly To Stab President Obama In The Back And Sabotage Pe

House Speaker John Boehner committed a crime when he invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to a joint session of Congress, and now he is freely admitting that he not only did so behind President Obama’s back, he did so to sabotage delicate peace talks with Iran.

During an interview on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Boehner confessed that he knew the White House wouldn’t appreciate a foreign leader being brought in to wreck diplomatic efforts to keep Iran from developing a nuclear bomb, so he did so in secret to prevent President Obama from nixing the GOP plan to undermine him.

Of course, Boehner denied that he did anything wrong despite the fact that there is a 1799 law still on books known as the Logan Act which forbids unauthorized US citizens from negotiating with foreign leaders. Only the executive branch has that authority.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/02/16/boehner-confesses-i-invited-netanyahu-secretly-to-stab-president-obama-in-the-back-and-sabotage-peace-talks-video/

If that isn't sedition, what is?

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boehner Confesses: I Invited Netanyahu Secretly To Stab President Obama In The Back And Sabotage Pe (Original Post) meow2u3 Feb 2015 OP
Not that Boehner is not a meddling asshole, but since he cannot really force Obama djean111 Feb 2015 #1
Yes. It is treason. madashelltoo Feb 2015 #2
Yet nothing is done about it AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #7
cause, It's ok if you're a Republican. TDale313 Feb 2015 #26
Because the gop has so much damaging info on everyone, no one dares oppose them. Dont call me Shirley Feb 2015 #27
Why is this happening??? we the people just sit back and do nothing but talk about movonne Feb 2015 #30
We the people AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #33
Keep electing wimp Dems with no backbone and what else could you expect?? pocoloco Feb 2015 #56
umm, Nancy P. did just that Telcontar Feb 2015 #32
You are referring to the 'birther' charges against her? AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #36
Link enclosed Telcontar Feb 2015 #44
When was that? Bartlet Feb 2015 #40
April 4th, 2007 Telcontar Feb 2015 #45
She was part of a delegation made up of Republicans and Democrats. alfredo Feb 2015 #47
Regardless , she DID undercut President Bush's foreign policy Telcontar Feb 2015 #55
How does one interpret Boehner's admission as merely an allegation? LanternWaste Feb 2015 #58
Post removed Post removed Feb 2015 #63
It is not unusual for congressional delegations to travel to hot spots. I alfredo Feb 2015 #71
Doesnt change the facts of the matter Telcontar Feb 2015 #75
One, Pelosi, was working for Peace for Syria and Israel, Boehner is trying to sabotage peaceful diplomacy alfredo Feb 2015 #77
What was Bush's policy on Syria? alfredo Feb 2015 #73
Please see reply 75 Telcontar Feb 2015 #76
Intent means a lot. Is the intent to do harm, or to do good? alfredo Feb 2015 #78
You're certain of that? Or do you suppose she was carrying a message from the White House? MADem Feb 2015 #79
helping Netanyahu in landing kiri Feb 2015 #50
Shalom! MyOwnPeace Feb 2015 #68
There s a difference between "influence" and sabotage. world wide wally Feb 2015 #23
Fuck him! world wide wally Feb 2015 #3
If a Democrat would have done this, he/she would be heading to prison. C Moon Feb 2015 #4
And once again SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #5
It is a violation AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #9
Having someone speak to Congress is not undermining foreign policy SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #11
If doing so undermines what the president is doing with Iran AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #12
As Speaker of the House SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #14
For the purpose of undermining the president? AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #16
Logan Act blah blah blah SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #17
Laws against robbing banks blah blah blah AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #19
Pretty funny stuff SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #28
It's called "sabotage" world wide wally Feb 2015 #24
No, POTUS would not have prosecuted. He's too busy "looking forward". cui bono Feb 2015 #42
Ya THINK??!! staggerleem Feb 2015 #72
Thanks, that is what I thought. I believe that if Boehner contacted IRAN leadership, djean111 Feb 2015 #13
"Incredibly petty bullshit" sums it up perfectly SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #15
you seem desperate! stonecutter357 Feb 2015 #53
No idea what you mean SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #54
+10 840high Feb 2015 #41
wholly relevant between the legal/classical definition of a word, and its more common, colloquial LanternWaste Feb 2015 #59
Republicans are allowed to get away with sedition and treason AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #6
How can it be permitted ? maindawg Feb 2015 #8
except the gnewz media is NOT on our side yet. still in reagan's corner, so you will NOT hear pansypoo53219 Feb 2015 #10
I partly blame Obama for this. Unknown Beatle Feb 2015 #18
Yeah..."Thanks Obama!" pkdu Feb 2015 #21
I guess people don't like to hear Unknown Beatle Feb 2015 #22
The Espionage Act of 1917... gregcrawford Feb 2015 #20
It may seem petty and inconsequential, but it could possibly lead to war. world wide wally Feb 2015 #25
Boehner is guilty of being an ass, which he does quite well without any help at all. mountain grammy Feb 2015 #29
Boehner's an ass, but he hasn't violated the Logan Act. ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #31
Far too many forget the Speaker is the co-equal of the President Telcontar Feb 2015 #34
Actually, neither Roberts nor Boehner is equal to the President Samantha Feb 2015 #52
They don't treestar Feb 2015 #66
He should go back to Loompaland ybbor Feb 2015 #35
Involves member of our Government and another Country so it is treason. glinda Feb 2015 #37
Definition of treason: ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #38
I was looking for the Onion header. malthaussen Feb 2015 #39
#sueboehner redruddyred Feb 2015 #43
This is NOT an act of treason... penndragon69 Feb 2015 #46
u r right glinda Feb 2015 #48
Youre about 90 years too late Telcontar Feb 2015 #64
Repukes know they can do anything with impunity ailsagirl Feb 2015 #49
Republicans think EVERYTHING is okay against Democrats. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #51
Shout Delphinus Feb 2015 #57
Obama should deny entrance to Netanyahu or confine him to the Israeli emabssy Hokie Feb 2015 #60
If one follows republican type protocol Madmiddle Feb 2015 #61
He's a traitorous shit JackInGreen Feb 2015 #62
Actually the Boehner should be impeached, but it won't happen still_one Feb 2015 #65
asswipe samsingh Feb 2015 #67
Just what is the punishment for treason these days ? We have quite a few that should be hanged . geretogo Feb 2015 #69
If Nancy Pelosi pulled a stunt like this? The Corporate Media allows this nutcase to get away w/it! Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2015 #70
Arrest him 1Greensix Feb 2015 #74
I read this and one word comes to mind, TRAITOR! B Calm Feb 2015 #80
sedition...seditioner...seditionist...thy name is Boner SummerSnow Feb 2015 #81
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. Not that Boehner is not a meddling asshole, but since he cannot really force Obama
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 03:40 PM
Feb 2015

to alter his negotiations, is this really treason, or is it treasonous to even attempt to influence the negotiations? I am trying to see why Boehner thinks this stunt is okay. And - it is a stunt.

madashelltoo

(1,704 posts)
2. Yes. It is treason.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 03:47 PM
Feb 2015

If a Democrat had pulled this stunt while "W" was in office, they would still be flipping his ass on the Traitor Grill.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
7. Yet nothing is done about it
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:20 PM
Feb 2015

They are allowed to do anything they want without ever facing the music for it.

alfredo

(60,077 posts)
47. She was part of a delegation made up of Republicans and Democrats.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:38 AM
Feb 2015

You have to remember that Bush didn't do diplomacy. Both sides of the aisle was getting frustrated with Bush not wanting to talk peace in the Mideast.

 

Telcontar

(660 posts)
55. Regardless , she DID undercut President Bush's foreign policy
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:43 AM
Feb 2015

Pretty much same allegation tossed against the Speaker.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
58. How does one interpret Boehner's admission as merely an allegation?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:00 AM
Feb 2015

How does one interpret Boehner's admission as merely an allegation?

Response to LanternWaste (Reply #58)

alfredo

(60,077 posts)
71. It is not unusual for congressional delegations to travel to hot spots. I
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 02:46 PM
Feb 2015

seem to remember trips to Cuba, Afghanistan to meet the Taliban, and Russia. The difference was that the Boehner invite was for the sole purpose to undermine the negotiations to end the Iran nuclear program. A peaceful resolution is contrary to what Bibi and Republicans want. They want war with Iran. Also the Bibi visit was an effort to influence the Israeli elections, and drive a wedge between Obama and Israel.

The congressional trip to Syria was to urge peace between Syria and Israel. Bush showed little interest in diplomatic solutions, and our nation suffered from his "cowboy diplomacy." He felt the US didn't need allies in his military march across south Asia (See PNAC mission statement) BTW, Assad was allowing Iraqi refugees cross into Syria. See Baghdad Burning's last blog entries.

Most Americans didn't know that Iran was working with us to destroy al Qaeda. Bush fucked that up with his "Axis of Evil" comments, then invading a fellow member of the "Axis" and Iran's neighbor: Iraq. That pushed Iran to the right and into the arms of Ahmadinejad. The moderates were gaining strength in Iran before Bush raised the specter of invasion. The paranoia of the conservatives in Iran gave rise to a vigorous nuke program. It took the election of Obama to begin undoing the damage done to the nuclear non proliferation efforts of Pre GWB presidents.


Bibi and Republicans need enemies to scare their base into compliance. Remove Iran as a threat, and lose the fear that motivates the right wing. The Likud needs a threat from Iran to hold power. Iranian conservatives need a threat from the US and Israel to hold power. American Conservatives needs Iran to be a scary nuclear power to keep their base scared and involved.

 

Telcontar

(660 posts)
75. Doesnt change the facts of the matter
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:46 PM
Feb 2015

Screaming about Boehner undermining President Obama is hypocritical if you supported Speaker Pelosi.

alfredo

(60,077 posts)
77. One, Pelosi, was working for Peace for Syria and Israel, Boehner is trying to sabotage peaceful diplomacy
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 12:23 AM
Feb 2015

between the US and Iran. Since we lost Iraq to Iran, forging peace between Syria and Israel would have been in our interests. Bush wasn't interested in diplomacy.


Syria was not yet in a state of civil war, and we needed their cooperation to act as a buffer between Israel and Iran. As you remember, Iran was the ultimate winner in Iraq. Three Sunni states stand between Israel and Iran.


"If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely, and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy but just wage a total war, our children will sing great songs about us years from now."
Richard Perle - Bush's Office of Special Plans

This was, in a nutshell, Bush's idea of diplomacy.

alfredo

(60,077 posts)
73. What was Bush's policy on Syria?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 03:08 PM
Feb 2015

Congress was left in the dark on many occasions. He constantly tried to undermine laws that he signed with signing statements that said he wasn't bound by those laws, and didn't need to keep congress informed.

How could Pelosi undermine a policy when she could find no Syrian policy out of the White house?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
79. You're certain of that? Or do you suppose she was carrying a message from the White House?
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 05:12 AM
Feb 2015

That's quite often the case when a delegation goes overseas, even if there's an element of plausible deniability. Bush wasn't complaining, and there was probably a reason for that.

The Speaker isn't overseas, paying a call, making a visit--he's here, in the USA. And he's rolled out the House red carpet for a foreign president seeking reelection, without consulting that leader's American counterpart.

So it's not the same thing at all--he's violated protocol at a minimum.

He's stepped in it.

kiri

(799 posts)
50. helping Netanyahu in landing
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 01:37 AM
Feb 2015

Suggested dialog:

Aerobus666 calling Dulles airport; we request approach and landing instructions.
Dulles traffic control: Hello Aerobus, acknowledged. What is your authorization code?

AB: Authorization code? What is this?
D: You are not a scheduled commercial airline. You are required to have an approved authorization code to land.

AB666: Look, we are bringing the Prime Minister of Israel to the USA, Benjamin Netanyahu.
D: Who?

AB666: the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.
D: Spell that please.

AB666: B-i-b-i ....
D: Is that male or female? What is his Visa Number?

AB666: He is a citizen of Israel. He does not need a Visa.
D: Please hold. {hold music; "Come Josephine In My Flying Machine"

}
...several minutes

D: Sorry, you are right, he does not need a Visa.
D: What is his passport number?

AB666: He is the Prime Minister, he has a diplomatic passport.

D: OK. What is the number?
AB666: He does not carry his passport. He is the Prime Minister of Israel.

D; OK. He is not the President?

AB666: We are getting close, what about landing?

D; Have you filed an application to land with the Office of Protocol at the State Department?

AB666: No.
D: We suggest this to avoid delays in the future.

D: Are you carrying any weapons?
AB666: {gasp} Hmm. Hold a minute. {hold music: proper music suggestions welcomed:
}

AB666: I am not authorized to answer that question.

D: Hmm. Is he requesting asylum? How many family members are accompanying him?
AB666: None.

D: How many persons are traveling with him requesting entry? Do they have passports?
AB666: His assistants and security detail are about 27.

D: Is your client coming to the USA for treatment of a communicable sexual disease, such as AIDS/HIV or other disease?
AB666: No.
D: Good. Is he coming to the USA for treatment of Ebola?
AB666: No.

D: How long will you be here? After delivering your passengers, where will fly your Aerobus?
AB666: We will leave in about a week--there's an election, y'know.

D; Are you expecting to park your aircraft?
AB666: Of course.

D: Have you paid the parking fee? I'll have to look it up for an AB666, it's about $25,000 per day.
AB666: This is ridiculous. We always pay our bills.

D: Are you paying with money that America sent to Israel? In any case, the parking fees must be paid in advance.

AB666: These will be paid by the Israeli Embassy, Ambassador Dermer

D: Will that be a credit card or debit card?
...............

D: OK, so he is not the President, he doesn't have his passport with him, you and he may or may not be carrying weapons, he did not apply for an authoriztion from the Office of Protocol.
We are diverting you to Baltimore or Philadelphia. They have enhanced processing facilities there.

AB666: NO! Wait! He is going to be met at Dulles by Members of Congress, the Ambassador, many people. We can't land in Philadelphia.

D: There are good ground transportation choices in Phila. He can take the train to Washington; there are also buses, and rental cars. Probably taxis.
Tell you what, I'll call ahead and see that a ground transportation expert is available for you.

Now, do you prefer Baltimore or Philadelphia?

AB666: {sputter}

D: Thank you for calling Dulles Airport. Have a wonderful day. Shalom.

world wide wally

(21,757 posts)
3. Fuck him!
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:02 PM
Feb 2015

I wish someone had the balls to charge these asshole Republicans as traitors as they so richly deserve. It doesn't even matter if they are ultimately convicted. Kind of like a sex crime. Just the fact that one is charged leaves a permanent stain, and Republicans so deserve to be stained for their actions over the past 6 years.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
5. And once again
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:14 PM
Feb 2015

the word "treason" is thrown about with apparently no idea of what it really means.

And no, inviting a foreign leader to speak to Congress is not a violation of the Logan Act, nor is the President's approval needed.

Boehner is an ass for doing it, but there is nothing illegal about it.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
9. It is a violation
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:23 PM
Feb 2015

If doing so undermines the presidents foreign policy, which is exactly what happened in this case.

It is a felony and Bone Bone should be charged with such.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
11. Having someone speak to Congress is not undermining foreign policy
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:34 PM
Feb 2015

Members of Congress meet with foreign leaders all the time. What Boehner did was a slap in the face to the President, and huge breach of protocol, but illegal? Not even close.

I think it's pretty funny that the President is just brushing this off as the dimwitted attempt at one-upmanship that it is, while others are screaming "treason!" and "Logan Act violation!"

If the President felt this were treasonous, he would have it prosecuted.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
12. If doing so undermines what the president is doing with Iran
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:39 PM
Feb 2015

In order to prosecute Boehner under the Logan Act, there would have to be sufficient proof that he was acting "without authority" when he asked Netanyahu to come and speak to Congress, and that "authority" isn't specified in the law, although at the time it was passed, it was clearly intended to be held in the hands of President John Adams, who was furious that members of Congress were talking to French politicians.

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/28690-is-john-boehner-a-traitor

The law was intended for specific situations like this one.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
14. As Speaker of the House
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:46 PM
Feb 2015

he has the authority to invite whomever he chooses to speak before Congress. Without or without the President's permission.

It's that whole separation of powers thing.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
16. For the purpose of undermining the president?
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:53 PM
Feb 2015

He does not.

The Logan act specifically addresses that whole separation of powers thing.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
17. Logan Act blah blah blah
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:57 PM
Feb 2015

He isn't negotiating with a foreign government, he's listening to a speech.

Much ado about nothing, and thankfully, our President understands that.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
19. Laws against robbing banks blah blah blah
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 05:02 PM
Feb 2015

....are much ado about nothing, right?

Boehner ADMITS doing it to undermine the US foreign policy.

You are relaying the official FOX news talking points.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
28. Pretty funny stuff
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 05:40 PM
Feb 2015
You are relaying the official FOX news talking points.


This coming from a guy that linked to a story that uses Fox News as its source.

I don't watch Fox News - do you?

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
42. No, POTUS would not have prosecuted. He's too busy "looking forward".
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:45 PM
Feb 2015

He didn't bother to prosecute war criminals, why would he bother with this, which pales in comparison.

 

staggerleem

(469 posts)
72. Ya THINK??!!
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 02:58 PM
Feb 2015

With Boehner INVENTING reasons to bring lawsuits against the Executive Branch, don't'cha think that if there were a legitimate reason to either prosecute or sue the Speaker, those wheels would ALREADY be in motion?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
13. Thanks, that is what I thought. I believe that if Boehner contacted IRAN leadership,
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:43 PM
Feb 2015

and stipulated different terms, then that would be treason, but this is just incredibly petty bullshit cooked up by Netanyahu, Dermer, and Boehner. Netanyahu is actually using Boehner, for a fool, but Boehner, I think, does not see that, he only thinks he is demonstrating how strong he thinks he is, to the Tea Party. IMO, etc.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
15. "Incredibly petty bullshit" sums it up perfectly
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:47 PM
Feb 2015

Add in immature and insulting, and Boehner gets the hat trick.

But illegal and/or treasonous? Not even close.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
59. wholly relevant between the legal/classical definition of a word, and its more common, colloquial
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:03 AM
Feb 2015

I imagine a rational mind realizes the wholly relevant between the legal/classical definition of a word, and its more common, colloquial usage.

Maybe the strictures are thrown about by with apparently no idea of what colloquial and informal speech is.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
6. Republicans are allowed to get away with sedition and treason
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:18 PM
Feb 2015

...cuz if anything were done about it, they would jump up and down real loud and say mean stuff and things....

 

maindawg

(1,151 posts)
8. How can it be permitted ?
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:21 PM
Feb 2015

If its against the law. How can Netenyahoo even be permitted to address congress if there i a law against it, he should just be arrested by anyone at all. This is crazy. And if John Boehner is committing a crime, what is the statue of limitations? 10 years ?

This strikes me as being as silly as if John B thought he could issue a pardon or some other privilege lawfully reserved for the executive office.

pansypoo53219

(21,004 posts)
10. except the gnewz media is NOT on our side yet. still in reagan's corner, so you will NOT hear
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:34 PM
Feb 2015

treason OR sedition. 'its just politics'.

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
18. I partly blame Obama for this.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 05:00 PM
Feb 2015

The repugs are seeing that Obama is not doing anything to the bankers that nearly destroyed the economy and to the bush administration for starting illegal wars. So they figure that they will try to sabotage peace talks because Obama won't go after them anyway.

And the next two years we're going to get the same thing with a new AG not prosecuting the bankers and/or the bush cabal.

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
20. The Espionage Act of 1917...
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 05:07 PM
Feb 2015

...was enhanced in 1918 with amendments commonly referred to as the Sedition Laws. Sedition is basically saying not very nice things about the government, a broad catch-all that resulted in around 1,500 prosecutions. The Sedition Act was repealed in 1920.

Bottom Line: As much as I despise that waste of (orange) skin, Boehner cannot be guilty of sedition. And the Constitutional definition of treason is extremely narrow, so he can't really be nabbed for that, either.

It is, however, perfectly alright to hope he gets hit by a fuckin' bus!

world wide wally

(21,757 posts)
25. It may seem petty and inconsequential, but it could possibly lead to war.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 05:30 PM
Feb 2015

Then it won't seem so inconsequential.
Will it?

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
31. Boehner's an ass, but he hasn't violated the Logan Act.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 06:07 PM
Feb 2015

As Speaker of the House of Representatives, he can invite whomthehellever he wants to address the House. Doing so is not negotiating with a foreign power, nor is it undermining the President's conduct of foreign policy.

 

Telcontar

(660 posts)
34. Far too many forget the Speaker is the co-equal of the President
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 06:20 PM
Feb 2015

As is the Chief Justice. No one pays attention to that separation of powers thing.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
52. Actually, neither Roberts nor Boehner is equal to the President
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:32 AM
Feb 2015

Last edited Tue Feb 17, 2015, 05:05 AM - Edit history (1)

The House and the Senate collectively compose the Legislative Branch, which has one-third of the power allotted to the Federal Government, as opposed to the states. The Supreme Court has one-third, and the Executive Branch, all of which is under the President of the United States, meaning he or she is in control of that branch, has one-third. If you want to define a singular person who has the most power, that would be the President since the others co-share power with others in their branches. That is the theory as particularly defined in the Constitution, but the reality is everyone in Washington thinks they run it.

So this is what comprises the checks and balances within our Federal Government that the Koch Brothers and other billionaires actually control. As far as who actually represents the rights of the little guy, we are each on our own....

Sam

ybbor

(1,555 posts)
35. He should go back to Loompaland
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 06:22 PM
Feb 2015

He could negotiate internationally for them. Maybe he could end the savage wars they have been engaged in all this years. Oh wait, he'd only figure out how to profit from them.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
38. Definition of treason:
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 06:59 PM
Feb 2015
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

-- 18 U.S. Code § 2381

What Boehner's done is massively disrespectful, but it's not treasonous.
 

penndragon69

(788 posts)
46. This is NOT an act of treason...
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:29 AM
Feb 2015

But it IS an act of SEDITION, which is still a criminal
act and can be cause for arrest and imprisonment.

But in the good ole days, seditionists were usually
found hanging from a rope in the county square.

ailsagirl

(22,901 posts)
49. Repukes know they can do anything with impunity
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 01:12 AM
Feb 2015

They keep pushing the proverbial envelope and so far it's never considered over the top

Apparently, they believe they're above the law.

In my naive days, I used to think they'd surely overreach and their party would go tumbling down.

Ah well... we keep on keeping on.



Hokie

(4,288 posts)
60. Obama should deny entrance to Netanyahu or confine him to the Israeli emabssy
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:15 AM
Feb 2015

Last edited Tue Feb 17, 2015, 03:13 PM - Edit history (1)

Seriously, if I were Obama I would tell the PM he can come to the US but he is persona non grata so he can keep his butt at the embassy the entire visit.

 

Madmiddle

(459 posts)
61. If one follows republican type protocol
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:24 AM
Feb 2015

there will be at least 4 years of Benghazi like hearings to get to the bottom of this treasonous act. Followed by 4 more years in court and costing "taxpayers" $20,000,000.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
62. He's a traitorous shit
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:47 AM
Feb 2015

but we'll never see him swing for it, more's the pity..I'll keep dreaming though.

1Greensix

(111 posts)
74. Arrest him
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:01 PM
Feb 2015

Arrest him for breaking the law. When the HELL are we going to demand that the rich and powerful be held accountable for their crimes??????? This country is getting crazy. Do rich people go to prison in any state nowadays?? ONLY the Executive Branch may conduct foreign policy. Beaner needs to be arrested for treason, tried, convicted and sentenced to twenty years. Let him cry his damned eyes out in Leavenworth Federal Prison. Kansas is lovely this time of year.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boehner Confesses: I Invi...