General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPHOTO: Ashley Graham First Plus-Sized Model In Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Truth rating: 10 S
Ashley Graham is the first-ever plus-size model to be featured in the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue. The bikini-clad model, who is a size 14-16, appears in the 2015 edition, which hits newsstands next week.
Grahams appearance is part of an ad for the plus-size bathing suit company, swimsuitsforall. She says in a statement, I know my curves are sexy and I want everyone else to know that theirs are too. There is no reason to hide and every reason to flaunt.
snip
Graham was recently in the news for slamming the medias perception of size. She said wrote in an essay for The Edit, I was told to look up to Marilyn Monroe and J.Lo, because those were the only two curvy women considered beautiful. We need role models for young girls who say, Embrace your curves. Who cares that your body isnt perfect? Theres too much anorexia, obesity and suicide in this generation and nobody is addressing the issue.
Young girls dont have much to look at, curvy women are not on covers of magazines, theyre not talked about on social media as much as other celebrities, Graham continued. Jennifer Lawrence is the medias poster girl for curves [but] shes tiny. What do you think?
http://www.gossipcop.com/ashley-graham-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-issue-photo-plus-size-model-swimsuits-for-all-ad-curves-in-bikinis-campaign-video
Vinca
(50,310 posts)If they really want "swimsuits for all," they'll put a picture on the cover of a woman who is 5'5" and a size 26. That's a "plus" size model.
sundevil2000
(92 posts)she is definitely a plus size MODEL
meow2u3
(24,773 posts)as opposed to those skinny models with unnaturally prominent ribs. With those models, it looks as if it's only a matter of time before they keel over from starvation.
In other words, she's of ideal weight for her height and build, something I wish I could be again.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)underpants
(182,892 posts)The top is way too big
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)underpants
(182,892 posts)Well now that I think about it
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)YMMV.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I don't know if they count as "clothing" exactly, but I don't see why not.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)Can you say zaftig?
--imm
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)I don't get why it's funny, though.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)JI7
(89,275 posts)Plus size bathing suits
closeupready
(29,503 posts)It's clearly attempting to draw a similarity between the slender SI swimsuit models and, on the other hand, this more robust one.
JI7
(89,275 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Like, not at all.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)then you must reject all of it (and conversely, if you consider the exploitation of the physical appearance of models who conform to cultural ideals of physical beauty an exploitation which is harmless and dandy, then you must also consider the exploitation of those who do NOT conform as harmless and dandy).
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Is inherently "exploitative" in the slightest.
And yes, harmless and dandy, also inherently a positive and even a good thing.
But then, life is short and I don't get mad if consenting adults enjoy it a little. I know others feel real differently about that, which is weird, but I've given up trying to understand certain human peculiarities.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)On the other hand, when the models seem - for whatever reason - to not be consenting, it does bother me, greatly.
Modeling is her career, so she's definitely consenting, IMO.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)is consenting, and probably fairly well compensated for the gig.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)If anything, those who are paying newsstand price to be bombarded with all those erotoxins would seem to be the ones who are being exploited.
Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)a wall of her house to get her to the photo shoot.
Orrex
(63,225 posts)On the grounds that she was able to exit her house without requiring demolition of an exterior wall. In other words, Ykcutnek suggests that some on DU will not accept this model as "plus sized" because she's not morbidly obsese several times over.
A real knee-slapper, right?
a la izquierda
(11,797 posts)I'd prefer not to get my post hidden by linking to his comments about rape or an entire population of South America.
What do you mean?
aikoaiko
(34,184 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
TheCowsCameHome
(40,169 posts)I'll let it go at that.
No sense being alerted on.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)made that picture look like a spring shower while out for a Sunday drive.
petronius
(26,603 posts)I really like what I'm finding...
PassingFair
(22,434 posts)I can smell the salt water!
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)not plus-sized. Though I'd rather see this than those size 0 models who look like walking skeletons and in no way resemble the average woman.
Snow Leopard
(348 posts)viewing SI's swimsuit issue then. Kate Upton can't be a size 0
LifeLoveLib
(6 posts)Good for her.
Models nowadays are far too skinny.
BIG women are attractive.
hunter
(38,328 posts)... then I'll know things have changed for the best.
But okay, any small step away from the current "supermodel" look (whatever that is now) is a step in the right direction.
My own measure of "sexual attractiveness" tends to track my own age group. My own kids' significant others are attractive but my paternal instincts kick in and take overwhelming precedence. My first thought when I see the current batch of super-models might be summarized as "eat something and quit worrying about your hair or makeup."
My own sexual identity was formed at the tail end of the dirty hippie era. Swimsuits, shaving, "nice" hair, make-up, or anorexic and overwrought levels of attention paid to curves or muscle tone or airbrushable stretch marks, I wasn't paying attention to any of that. I still don't.
The only ugly people I ever meet are ugly for the things they say or the way they act.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)her best feature is her face.
Stunningly beautiful.
JI7
(89,275 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)INCOMING, DU!!!!!
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)It's going to be a nice, polite, well-reasoned discussion this year, sort of like a book club discussing Homeric verse.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)That went well.
Baitball Blogger
(46,758 posts)spiderman on a wall and his butt is very explicit. Sells for more than 3 thou.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)I actually learned something from that. Until that brouhaha hit, I didn't even know there was a Spider Woman. Of course I was never really into Marvel Comics, more of a DC guy.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)to keep the whole Spider Human thing going ... Sooo, ya know, it all makes sense.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)The thought of little spiders gives me the creeps.
rickford66
(5,528 posts)you can see a guy behind her.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)No kidding. Just do quick google search for Ashley Graham.
nikto
(3,284 posts)This is progress?
OK, OK.
Small steps.
Uh...
Microscopic steps.
Skittles
(153,193 posts)AwakeAtLast
(14,134 posts)Male models are just as anorexic looking. Give me a man with some substance, please!