General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNearly 80 percent of those who collected more than $500,000 for Obama took key administration posts.
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2011/06/15/4880/obama-rewards-big-bundlers-jobs-commissions-stimulus-money-government-contracts-and
By Fred Schulte, The Center for Public Integrity
2:00 am, June 15, 2011 Updated: 12:19 pm, May 19, 2014
More than two years after President Obama took office vowing to banish special interests from his administration, nearly 200 of his biggest donors have landed plum government jobs and advisory posts, won federal contracts worth millions of dollars for their business interests or attended numerous elite White House meetings and social events, an investigation by iWatch News has found.
...
The iWatch News investigation found:
Overall, 184 of 556, or about one-third, of Obama bundlers or their spouses joined the administration in some role. But the percentages are much higher for the big-dollar bundlers. Nearly 80 percent of those who collected more than $500,000 for Obama took key administration posts, as defined by the White House. More than half the ambassador nominees who were bundlers raised more than half a million.
The big bundlers had broad access to the White House for meetings with top administration officials and glitzy social events. In all, campaign bundlers and their family members account for more than 3,000 White House meetings and visits. Half of them raised $200,000 or more.
...
The cluster of appointments among top bundlers suggests that the size of the donation may have been a factor at least in getting a foot in the door. Less than one in five at the $50,000 level got an administration position. Half of $200,000 bundlers were picked for some post; 80 percent of the $500,000 bundlers were appointed. (Some have since left the administration while others remain in their posts.)
Much, much more at link. It's an old article, but updated in 2014.
kentuck
(111,097 posts)in that he believes that money is the mother's milk of politics. He equates money with power. What money can't buy isn't really worth having.
marym625
(17,997 posts)K&R
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)starting bid? Good to know.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sometimes, it's a campaign donation of low five figures, even four. Maybe not that low at the Presidential level, but for Congress, yes.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Not too bad at all. Gives me an idea or two.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The first term, they have to ensure donations for the re-election run. The second term, they have to ensure donations for the Presidential Library and post-Presidency cash flow.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)I can see how someone who can do that would be useful in many political appointments.
It's not like Obama sat down and said "wow, this dude earned X amount of money." It's more that Obama saw the person a lot, they were at a lot of fund raisers and events, they were in the know, they made friends, contacts. They helped write legislation, they stayed up nights thinking about how to get a given bill passed, they contacted the lobbyists you'd agree with, etc.
vi5
(13,305 posts)We need people in key posts who make decisions not based on the politics and optics but on the effectivity of the decision being made and whether it is in the best interest of the department in question and the country as a whole.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Clearly.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)As long as they cough up the contributions.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Elena Kagan - Willing Accomplice
By Michael Collins
Then, when Siegelman appealed his case to the Supreme Court in 2009, President Obama's Attorney General dispatched Solicitor General Elena Kagan to argue against the appeal Iii in November.
Before accepting the case, Elena Kagan knew or should have known: that the U.S. Attorney who began the Siegelman investigation was closely tied to Karl Rove; that Siegelman never benefited personally from the contribution to an education funding initiative; that the case was so outrageous, forty-four attorneys general petitioned Congress; and, that the presiding judge in the case owned a major interest in a defense firm that received a $178 million federal contract between Siegelman's indictment and trial, a massive conflict of interest.
Most revealing, before her argument against the former governor's appeal, Kagan knew or should have known the following. After two charges had been dropped in a 2009 appeal, Justice Department attorneys recommended a twenty year sentence instead of the seven years already rendered. Fewer offenses for sentencing meant thirteen additional years by the strange logic of federal justice.
Kagan knew or should have known all this and more. That didn't stop her from arguing that Don Siegelman should be kept in jail. ...
That judgment is that Elena Kagan was a willing accomplice in one of the most outrageous political prosecutions of our time.
CONTINUED...
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Obama should have pardoned Siegelman long ago. Siegelman should never have gone to prison.
He went to jail for doing what virtually every other politician does routinely.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Karl Rove, the Bush administration, and coerced testimony. Siegelman will likely be exonerated eventually.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)the Obama administration.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Most of his pardons are people who already served their sentence but went on to be productive citizens, he's only commuted the sentence of 10 people, all drug charges, most of whom served many years in prison.
We'll see if he pulls a Bill Clinton style mass pardoning before he leaves. I'd like to see Manning and Snowden in there as well. But I doubt it.
ileus
(15,396 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)No wait, Ambassador to Holland.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)You just have to get around 200 people to donate the max contribution to the President, then you'd be in the 80%.
20score
(4,769 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)In the game of life, the wealthy win. Every time.