Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 05:45 PM Apr 2012

Dwight D. Eisenhower

How is it that his ideas got lost to people that are the anti-thesis of the ideas he voted, championed, and fought for?

He was a Republican. He would be a commie, liberal thief just 48 years later. He had ideas like "limiting the power of the Military Industrial Complex, because it robs from children when we make bombs". I know, I'm paraphrasing, but there were once Republicans that believed in such ideas. They are great ideas, that respect women, children and a society that wants to live in peace and prosperity.

Speak those in public, and somehow, you are believing in communism, something Eisenhower fought all of his life, and you aren't worth a damn if you care for the least of our society.

Where in the HELL did we go wrong when discussion of poverty became communism, socialism and fascism instead of just working to solve social problems? Why is it an "ISM" to discuss such problems? ISM. You aren't Republican, and you work for the interests of a wide variety of people.

I Smell Money.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Original Post) Aerows Apr 2012 OP
Most people say the downfall of the Republican party began with Reagan. Wait Wut Apr 2012 #1
Ike would be a Democrat today. trof Apr 2012 #2
Staunch Democrat Aerows Apr 2012 #4
Harry S. Truman tried to talk Ike into running as a Democrat in the 1952 election. FSogol Apr 2012 #33
Read the book. Missed that. trof Apr 2012 #34
More at Wiki: trof Apr 2012 #35
we had this very discussion in The Dallas Morning News today... w8liftinglady Apr 2012 #3
From what I can tell Aerows Apr 2012 #6
Try 'since Nixon'. trof Apr 2012 #36
It's a testament to what they will do Aerows Apr 2012 #37
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies ... a theft ... PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #5
Had that on my fridge as a child. ceile Apr 2012 #8
Eisenhower was a good man Aerows Apr 2012 #10
You might enjoy this. smokey nj Apr 2012 #13
LMAO! Aerows Apr 2012 #22
LOL! n/t ceile Apr 2012 #31
What I find so sad is that as extreme as the GOP is now they still have such a high percentage of libinnyandia Apr 2012 #7
It's like they are all crazy Aerows Apr 2012 #9
THIS guy. Octafish Apr 2012 #11
His associations Aerows Apr 2012 #12
What accomplishments? Octafish Apr 2012 #14
I think Aerows is talking about Eisenhower... white_wolf Apr 2012 #15
I understand. And I explained what happened to the GOP since. Octafish Apr 2012 #17
And I don't disagree Aerows Apr 2012 #20
Thank you Aerows Apr 2012 #18
I'm not even going there Aerows Apr 2012 #16
It's no Conspiracy Theory. It's no shit. Those are facts. And nowhere did I accuse you of anything. Octafish Apr 2012 #21
Well, thank you for making that more... Aerows Apr 2012 #24
I very much appreciate your OP and its rationale, Aerows. Octafish Apr 2012 #27
Thanks Octafish Aerows Apr 2012 #38
The growth of television steered the nation or at least the leadership of the political parties to Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #19
I'm glad I could speak up here Aerows Apr 2012 #25
George Romney was a Eisenhower Republican Kaleva Apr 2012 #23
Sane Republicans Aerows Apr 2012 #26
Eisenhower was a warmonger of the first order... MicaelS Apr 2012 #28
Yes, it is a stretch to say Ike would be a Democrat today if he was still alive. Kaleva Apr 2012 #29
Not every Democratic party member is a dove either Aerows Apr 2012 #39
I met Eisenhower flamingdem Apr 2012 #30
A cool story! Kaleva Apr 2012 #32

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
1. Most people say the downfall of the Republican party began with Reagan.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 05:52 PM
Apr 2012

I say Nixon. I told my son the other day that there were some great Republican presidents in our history that would be shunned by their own party today. We, as Democrats, will embrace them and not allow their memory to be tarnished by the horrendous words and actions of the current GOP.

If Romney can force his dead FIL to become a Mormon, I say Democrats should welcome good, dead Republicans into the Democratic Party.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
4. Staunch Democrat
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 05:59 PM
Apr 2012

I'm not sure whether I'm pleased or pissed that he can't see what his Republican party has turned into.

FSogol

(45,484 posts)
33. Harry S. Truman tried to talk Ike into running as a Democrat in the 1952 election.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:28 PM
Apr 2012

From David McCullough's book, "Truman."

trof

(54,256 posts)
35. More at Wiki:
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 07:39 PM
Apr 2012

Wonder why he 'disdained' the Dems?

"President Truman, symbolizing a broad based desire for an Eisenhower candidacy for president, again in 1951 pressed him to run for the office as a Democrat. It was at this time that Eisenhower vocalized his disdain for the Democratic party and declared himself and his family to be Republicans.[85] A "Draft Eisenhower" movement in the Republican Party persuaded him to declare his candidacy in the 1952 presidential election to counter the candidacy of non-interventionist Senator Robert Taft.

The effort was a long struggle; Eisenhower had to be convinced that 1) the political circumstances in the country had created a genuine duty for him to offer himself as a candidate, and 2) that there was a mandate from the populace for him to be their President. Henry Cabot Lodge who served as his campaign manager and others succeeded in convincing him, and in June 1952 he resigned his command at NATO to campaign full time.[86]

Eisenhower defeated Taft for the nomination, having won critical delegate votes from Texas. Eisenhower's campaign was noted for the simple but effective slogan, "I Like Ike". It was essential to his success that Ike express his opposition to Roosevelt's policy at Yalta and against Truman's policies in Korea and China., matters in which he had once participated.[87][88]

In defeating Taft for the nomination, it became necessary for Eisenhower to appease the right wing Old Guard of the Republican Party; his selection of Richard M. Nixon as the Vice-President on the ticket was designed in part for that purpose. Nixon also provided a strong anti-communist presence as well as some youth to counter Ike's more advanced age."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower#Presidential_campaign_of_1952

w8liftinglady

(23,278 posts)
3. we had this very discussion in The Dallas Morning News today...
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 05:57 PM
Apr 2012

Eisenhower would definitely be a Democrat.Moderates are not welcome in the Republican Party anymore.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
6. From what I can tell
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:02 PM
Apr 2012

They haven't been since Reagan. The Southern & Southwestern Republican arm of the party became the base, and they don't allow for anything other than what they consider "fundamentalism"

trof

(54,256 posts)
36. Try 'since Nixon'.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 07:44 PM
Apr 2012

The repugs have never gotten over Nixon's resignation one jump ahead of impeachment and never will.
It should have been a blot on the party forever and their willingness to do whatever it took, legal or not, to get their man in office.

As we have seen, it wasn't.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
37. It's a testament to what they will do
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 08:13 PM
Apr 2012

to gain money and power, and it's just as distasteful today as it was then.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
5. Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies ... a theft ...
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:01 PM
Apr 2012

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed,
those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its
scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric
power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay
for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than
8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true
sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. ... Is there no other way the world may live?"

- Dwight D. Eisenhower

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower

ceile

(8,692 posts)
8. Had that on my fridge as a child.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:11 PM
Apr 2012

My mother cried when Reagan was elected but thought the world of Eisenhower.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
10. Eisenhower was a good man
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:15 PM
Apr 2012

And unafraid to speak his mind.

This latest crop aren't afraid to speak their minds, and most of it consists of idiocy designed to make them popular with idiots.

smokey nj

(43,853 posts)
13. You might enjoy this.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:24 PM
Apr 2012
http://www.theonion.com/articles/embarrassed-republicans-admit-theyve-been-thinking,19248/

Embarrassed Republicans Admit They've Been Thinking Of Eisenhower Whole Time They've Been Praising Reagan

WASHINGTON—At a press conference Monday, visibly embarrassed leaders of the Republican National Committee acknowledged that their nonstop, effusive praise of Ronald Reagan has been wholly unintentional, admitting they somehow managed to confuse him with Dwight D. Eisenhower for years.

The GOP's humiliating blunder was discovered last weekend by RNC chairman Reince Priebus, who realized his party had been extolling "completely the wrong guy" after he watched the History Channel special Eisenhower: An American Portrait.

"When I heard about Eisenhower's presidential accomplishments—holding down the national debt, keeping inflation in check, and fighting for balanced budgets—it hit me that we'd clearly gotten their names mixed up at some point," Priebus told reporters. "I couldn't believe we'd been associating terms like 'visionary,' 'principled,' and 'bold' with President Reagan. That wasn't him at all—that was Ike."

"We deeply regret misattributing such a distinguished and patriotic legacy to Mr. Reagan," Priebus added. "We really screwed up."

libinnyandia

(1,374 posts)
7. What I find so sad is that as extreme as the GOP is now they still have such a high percentage of
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:05 PM
Apr 2012

people who identify with them. In a halfway decent country, they would be a small fraction of the people. In my district a nut case like Steve King can win with comfortable margins of victory.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
9. It's like they are all crazy
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:13 PM
Apr 2012

with the idea of party purity and nationalism. We all know where that went, and it scares me that fellow Americans could ever even head that way.

We are ALL Americans, or at least, at some time we were. What the hell happened?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
11. THIS guy.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:17 PM
Apr 2012
Prescott Sheldon Bush.

Here he is with President Eisenhower signing the legislation that created the Interstate Highway System.



Here he's straightening out Tricky Dick's hat:



In this shot, he's enjoying a moment with Baron de Rothschild.



As to the "Why" of it all: Know your BFEE: War and Oil are just two longtime Main Lines of Business

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
12. His associations
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:21 PM
Apr 2012

Don't overshine his accomplishments. I detest the people who he may have hung with, but himself? He stayed upstanding. I refuse to hold a person as culpable, as everyone else they came in contact with when they made an honest effort to change things to be less culpable.

If a person puts down their gun legally, and advocates less shooting, do we judge that person because they at one time encountered the beltway shooter? It's stupid, and false equivalency.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
17. I understand. And I explained what happened to the GOP since.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:33 PM
Apr 2012

Sen. Prescott Bush begat President George Herbert Walker Bush who begat pretzeldent George Walker Bush. Three generations of moving the GOP from a party interested in moving America forward into something that moves America's power and wealth into the pockets of the privileged few.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
20. And I don't disagree
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:36 PM
Apr 2012

I also didn't bring up Prescott Bush though, since that unnecessarily clouds the waters of the cogent political point I was trying to make.

You are welcome to make that point, it just seemed odd in this thread that didn't have anything to do with Bush.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
18. Thank you
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:34 PM
Apr 2012

That's all I was trying to bring up. Not a bunch of things that got dragged into the thread that had nothing to do with the original point.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
16. I'm not even going there
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:32 PM
Apr 2012

Because much of that is CT.

Are you going to accuse me of being a Republican now?

Don't jump the pier Octa. I was just making a point that my daddy's Republican party is a far cry from mine. No need to read a bunch of shit into it.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
21. It's no Conspiracy Theory. It's no shit. Those are facts. And nowhere did I accuse you of anything.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:37 PM
Apr 2012

You asked "Why?" aerows. I gave my thoughts on the subject of how the GOP strayed from what Ike was about. Sorry if what I posted doesn't mesh with what you think.





PS: Take your time. Have your friends check the links and posts out. Please let me know if you find something that's wrong.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
24. Well, thank you for making that more...
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:43 PM
Apr 2012

clear. I really do appreciate you weighing in on the topic. The topic is still not that we should despise Eisenhower. I think he was insightful as Republicans go, and would be a far left liberal in today's standards.

THAT was my point.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
27. I very much appreciate your OP and its rationale, Aerows.
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 07:52 PM
Apr 2012

The subject is one I've contemplated for decades, as a newspaper reporter and as a citizen. Thanks to the Internet, it's now possible to share the results I've found. That's why all the links. Please know that I am truly sorry if it came across that I wanted to hijack your thread or impugn what you had posted in the OP.

Authors like Russ Baker and Kevin Phillips have bravely brought these facts to the light of day, only to see their work ignored and their reputations besmirched. It's nothing against them -- both are highly regarded for their previous works -- it's just what they said to piss off this one GOP family.

I respect President Eisenhower and have stated so on DU. I've also brought up his lesser known side: A Cold Warrior who was unafraid to fight an atomic war.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
38. Thanks Octafish
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 08:17 PM
Apr 2012

You always tend to bring great points to any discussion, and I appreciate them. I didn't take it as impugning, I took it as in depth discussion. I learn something from everyone that brings new viewpoints into conversations

Uncle Joe

(58,361 posts)
19. The growth of television steered the nation or at least the leadership of the political parties to
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:34 PM
Apr 2012

the extreme radical right, authoritarian quadrant of the political spectrum.

The McCarthy Era witch hunts were the canaries in the coal mine signaling the corruptive power of monopolized, one way, top down, authoritarian worshiping, mass communication and information dissemination.

This is not to say, there weren't rare exceptions of voices crying out in the wilderness of the televised corporate media universe against the authoritarian corporate supremacist rip tide, but the sheer rigid model of top down, one way, corporate owned mass communication could ultimately only lead in one direction.

I believe Eisenhower; who came of age before television, was correct in identifying and warning against the power of the military industrial complex but without the brain washing propaganda of the dysfunctional one way, top down televised corporate media model, the military industrial complex wouldn't have near the power that it currently does over American Society.

If the American People are given good information, they can make wise decisions but that's a major if which the one way, top down televised corporate media model couldn't bring itself to overcome.

Everything with the televised corporate media orbits around money, this myopic focus on capitalism as the be all of existence has all but smothered the free ranging exchange and promotion of the best ideas and information that a good, functioning democracy requires.

Capitalism trumps democracy in virtually every televised debate or inference as to what's important to or best for the nation as corporations; authoritarian by nature; something they have in common with the military, own the televised media.

Thus a government actually representing the best interests of "We the People" public good over private exploitation would almost always go against the corporate televised authoritarian, right wing grain.

Thanks for the thread, Aerows.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
25. I'm glad I could speak up here
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:55 PM
Apr 2012

It's rather disturbing the turn our nation has taken to the hard right, Uncle Joe.

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
23. George Romney was a Eisenhower Republican
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:42 PM
Apr 2012

George's successor as governor of Michigan, Bill Milliken, was also cut from the same cloth. The sane Repubs in Michigan are often referred to as being "Milliken Republicans".

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
26. Sane Republicans
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 06:56 PM
Apr 2012

Oh, so fondly we remember that they existed. So rare they are today, and most of them now are Democratic Elected Officials because Republican has become the BatGuanoCrazy wing of the electorate.

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
28. Eisenhower was a warmonger of the first order...
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 07:59 PM
Apr 2012

The fascination of some people on the Left with Eisenhower, simply because of his anti MIC speech as he left office never ceases to amaze me. He presided over the enormous buildup of the US Nuclear Arsenal, and regularly contemplated Thermonuclear War with the USSR. Eisenhower was no Dove.

I can't copy and paste the entire article, it's far too long, but the 4 paragraphs below hits the highlights. I suggest you read the entire article.

http://hnn.us/articles/47326.html

Peace activists love to quote Dwight Eisenhower. The iconic Republican war hero who spoke so eloquently about the dangers of war and the need for disarmament makes a terrific poster-boy for peace. The image of Eisenhower as the “man of peace” is so useful that I almost hate to burst the bubble. But if you look at the historical record there is no escaping the other Eisenhower: the Eisenhower who said “he would rather be atomized than communized,” who reminds us how dangerous the cold war era really was and how easily political leaders can mask their intentions with benign images.


Early on, he noted in his diary what he later said in public: nuclear weapons would now be “treated just as another weapon in the arsenal.” “We have got to be in a position to use that weapon,” he insisted to Dulles. That became official policy in NSC 5810/1, which declared the U.S. intention to treat nuclear weapons “as conventional weapons; and to use them whenever required to achieve national objectives.” By early 1957, Eisenhower told the NSC that there could be no conventional battles any more: “The only sensible thing for us to do was to put all our resources into our SAC capability and into hydrogen bombs.” He found it “frustrating not to have plans to use nuclear weapons generally accepted.”

His whole reason for fighting was to prevent the communists from imposing a totalitarian state in America. He had long recognized the irony that nuclear war would lead to the very totalitarianism he abhorred. But he confessed to the Cabinet that he saw no way to avoid it: “He was coming more and more to the conclusion that … we would have to run this country as one big camp—severely regimented.” After reading plans for placing the nation under martial law, giving the president power to “requisition all of the nation’s resources–human and material,” he pronounced them “sound.”

It is hard to give up the “man of peace” that peace activists have come to admire. And perhaps it’s not fair to give him up. After all, we can never know what another person truly believes. But the record of the other Eisenhower is so consistent and so extensive (I’ve offered only a sampling here) that it is hard to ignore. More importantly, it is dangerous to ignore, because the other Eisenhower was the one who made actual policy. It was a policy that put anticommunist ideology above human life, made by a man who would “push whole stack of chips into the pot” and “hit ‘em … with everything in the bucket”; a man who would “shoot your enemy before he shoots you” and “hit the guy fast with all you’ve got”; a man who believed that the U.S. could “pick itself up from the floor” and win the war, even though “everybody is going crazy,” as long as only 25 or 30 American cities got “shellacked” and nobody got too “hysterical.”
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
39. Not every Democratic party member is a dove either
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 08:20 PM
Apr 2012

Many of us believe strongly in America and we believe that it should be defended. We just don't believe in starving its sons and daughters to do so when it isn't necessary.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
30. I met Eisenhower
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 09:06 PM
Apr 2012

I don't normally admit this as it reveals my age but he petted my head at the New York Worlds Fair. It had been raining and he came through a pavillion and we happened to be on the edge of the crowd that he was parting. He said "your hair must be wet little girl" as he fluffed my hair. I was pretty young but I remember what he said! A cool guy. Nothing like the repukes we endure today.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dwight D. Eisenhower