Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow a national food policy could save millions of American lives
from the WaPo:
How a national food policy could save millions of American lives
By Mark Bittman, Michael Pollan, Ricardo Salvador and Olivier De Schutter November 7
Mark Bittman, an opinion columnist and food writer for the New York Times, is the author of How to Cook Everything Fast. Michael Pollan, who teaches journalism at the University of California at Berkeley, is the author of The Omnivores Dilemma. Ricardo Salvador is a senior scientist and director of the food and environment program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. Olivier De Schutter, a professor of international human rights law at the Catholic University of Louvain, was the U.N. special rapporteur on the right to food from 2008 to 2014.
How we produce and consume food has a bigger impact on Americans well-being than any other human activity. The food industry is the largest sector of our economy; food touches everything from our health to the environment, climate change, economic inequality and the federal budget. Yet we have no food policy no plan or agreed-upon principles for managing American agriculture or the food system as a whole.
That must change.
The food system and the diet its created have caused incalculable damage to the health of our people and our land, water and air. If a foreign power were to do such harm, wed regard it as a threat to national security, if not an act of war, and the government would formulate a comprehensive plan and marshal resources to combat it. (The administration even named an Ebola czar to respond to a disease that threatens few Americans.) So when hundreds of thousands of annual deaths are preventable as the deaths from the chronic diseases linked to the modern American way of eating surely are preventing those needless deaths is a national priority.
.......(snip).......
Because of unhealthy diets, 100 years of progress in improving public health and extending lifespan has been reversed. Todays children are expected to live shorter lives than their parents. In large part, this is because a third of these children will develop Type 2 diabetes, formerly rare in children and a preventable disease that reduces life expectancy by several years. At the same time, our fossil-fuel-dependent food and agriculture system is responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than any other sector of the economy but energy. And the exploitative labor practices of the farming and fast-food industries are responsible for much of the rise in income inequality in America. ...............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-a-national-food-policy-could-save-millions-of-american-lives/2014/11/07/89c55e16-637f-11e4-836c-83bc4f26eb67_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1206 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How a national food policy could save millions of American lives (Original Post)
marmar
Nov 2014
OP
indepat
(20,899 posts)1. TPTB are not interested in a national policy that would save millions of American lives and would be
vehemently opposed imo were such policy to directly or indirectly require large corporations, the plutocrats, or the 1% in general to pay another penny in taxes.