General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, if "stay at home mom" is a working job...
... (or "homemaker" or whatever the popular term is) then how about, right now, today, in time for the summer campaigning season, count all five million of them as "employed", add them to the workforce numbers, and let Obama run on a platform of creating whatever jobs the stimulus did, plus 5 million?
Anybody want to place odds on getting the Rebubes to agree to that?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I doubt the Repubs would agree to that.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)income and having some kind of credit for later social security benefits. Instead I got to be way under the poverty line both then and now.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)You should have received some compensation. In a European social democratic country, you would have.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)with the welfare they provided. $.37 an hour.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)There are other benefits, too... godless communist anti-family benefits like free child care so the stay-at-home mom can become a working mom. The evil, it's just pure....
RainDog
(28,784 posts)families are paid a stipend by the state, no matter their income level, as a sort of income, or payment, for the costs of being a parent.
Of course, this nation is so far out there in rightie racist land there's no way that would happen here - but I just wanted to note that some western nations do see childcare as a form of work - though it's not included as part of employments figures, afaik.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Different thing.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)After all, having to direct the activities of the childrearing and housekeeping staff(s) really is more management than labor.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Like Bush likes to say, it's hard werk.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I really like that!
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Well played!