Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Even if Brown did commit robbery... (Original Post) JJChambers Aug 2014 OP
Just because someone is a suspect in a robbery Nye Bevan Aug 2014 #1
Meanwhile, he was wearing different clothes. JaneyVee Aug 2014 #46
They look like the same clothes and shoes to me... TeeYiYi Aug 2014 #52
What about the facial hair? notadmblnd Aug 2014 #60
Please don't misunderstand... TeeYiYi Aug 2014 #72
I could not tell from the shoes notadmblnd Aug 2014 #75
The shirt looks the same but to me the pants look different (nt) Nye Bevan Aug 2014 #81
That is not even a real assault on the clerk. SaltyBro Aug 2014 #2
I didn't commit robbery, punch clerks or punch policemen. JJChambers Aug 2014 #4
good for you, citizen frylock Aug 2014 #42
Those pictures absolutely show a real assault mythology Aug 2014 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts, crime scene JaneyVee Aug 2014 #47
His shorts... TeeYiYi Aug 2014 #56
1. It is an assault; looks like battery, too. 2. Crimes aren't mere "stupid stuff." 3. The murdered WinkyDink Aug 2014 #6
I agree. We are not doing ourselves any favors by trying to minimize or cover up Brown's violence. JJChambers Aug 2014 #8
Did he deserve to be shot and killed? Atman Aug 2014 #9
No! Let me stop you right there. hamsterjill Aug 2014 #16
Hey if someone did that to me cwydro Aug 2014 #34
Not a real assault? phil89 Aug 2014 #40
Unfortunately, this plays into 'reasonable doubt' in most people's minds. randome Aug 2014 #3
And that's it exactly el_bryanto Aug 2014 #7
Or even "It's too complicated. I don't want to think about it." randome Aug 2014 #11
Well actually that very succinctly expresses my opinion el_bryanto Aug 2014 #12
I agree. hamsterjill Aug 2014 #19
'reasonable doubt' about killing someone while the person is down on the ground after being shot? L0oniX Aug 2014 #26
Unless there is video, people will follow their preconceptions. randome Aug 2014 #51
I was looking at this picture and compared it to the picture of him laying down. Xyzse Aug 2014 #10
It's Brown. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #14
The guy in the "assault" picture? It sure doesn't look like it. Xyzse Aug 2014 #15
Looks identical to me. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #18
We'll agree to disagree, since I just don't see it. Xyzse Aug 2014 #21
Baseball caps are easily ditched. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #22
Too much of a stretch, and no, sandals are not unique. They don't even really look alike to me. Xyzse Aug 2014 #25
You do realize how lighting impacts how things look in photographs, right? n/t Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #29
I do realize that as well. It just doesn't look the same to me. Xyzse Aug 2014 #30
Look at the bottom left crime photo Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #37
I do see a similarity. I just don't see it as the same. Xyzse Aug 2014 #38
Johnson admitted it through his attorney. Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #91
It's brighter outside than in the store jberryhill Aug 2014 #62
I took that also in to account. I am not saying that it isn't possible that it is him, just that I Xyzse Aug 2014 #65
Ultimately, it does not matter one way or the other jberryhill Aug 2014 #73
Yeah, I think everyone agrees with that. Xyzse Aug 2014 #80
this article called it..... gblady Aug 2014 #33
That is very true too. Xyzse Aug 2014 #36
One of my questions - which I haven't seen answered anywhere - Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #41
Looks very much the same to me. Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #28
"Even if absolutely true" jberryhill Aug 2014 #71
I haven't seen anything one way or another - Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #77
This is what will let a cop get away with executing a man over cigars in the streets. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #13
This is exactly JustAnotherGen Aug 2014 #27
On Noes! He took a pack of Swisher Sweets!! OMG, Shoot him!! n/t PowerToThePeople Aug 2014 #17
No, he shouldn't have been shot for taking a pack of Sweeter Sweets. hamsterjill Aug 2014 #20
Are they saying he was shot for stealing? JJChambers Aug 2014 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author PowerToThePeople Aug 2014 #24
Minor point...it's SWISHER Sweets. Atman Aug 2014 #31
thank you PowerToThePeople Aug 2014 #32
Let's be Honest Robbins Aug 2014 #35
These pictures are not very good. What was Brown wearing when he was killed? Do they match jwirr Aug 2014 #39
But the guy who shot Brown had not seen those images intaglio Aug 2014 #43
Well I don't know about that JJChambers Aug 2014 #45
OK, go into a Missouri town intaglio Aug 2014 #48
It was the same guy. Its hard to argue that the officer didn't have a reason to stop him. JJChambers Aug 2014 #49
GET F'n EVIDENCE intaglio Aug 2014 #54
It's confirmed, man. JJChambers Aug 2014 #57
No, I said evidence not an argument from authority intaglio Aug 2014 #67
WATCH THE WHOLE VIDEO philosslayer Aug 2014 #44
Yeah I don't think the clerk phil89 Aug 2014 #53
Mr. Brown was guilty of "shopping while Black" philosslayer Aug 2014 #59
Not when he actually stole something Travis_0004 Aug 2014 #68
Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #74
How do you know he stole something? philosslayer Aug 2014 #76
Or for not having ID to purchase tobacco products jberryhill Aug 2014 #83
where is the video? n/t Enrique Aug 2014 #55
here Go Vols Aug 2014 #92
Is there a link to it somewhere? arcane1 Aug 2014 #64
Even if, still not worthy of a death sentence. NuclearDem Aug 2014 #50
that man does not even look like that child Mike Brown notadmblnd Aug 2014 #58
Its already confirmed through Brown's friend that it was him. JJChambers Aug 2014 #61
anyone got a link to friends claim? uponit7771 Aug 2014 #66
And he kept a razor in his pocket to shave with immediately after? notadmblnd Aug 2014 #69
It's just really disappointing. Mojo Electro Aug 2014 #63
Maybe next time.... JJChambers Aug 2014 #70
If it's a white guy next time Mojo Electro Aug 2014 #84
We will see soon enough. JJChambers Aug 2014 #85
As much as this sucks Mojo Electro Aug 2014 #88
Well, nobody shot Winona Ryder for shoplifting jberryhill Aug 2014 #90
"what's to say he was beating the policeman who shot him?" jberryhill Aug 2014 #78
The police officer could fake injuries after-the-fact. JJChambers Aug 2014 #79
The officer would fake injuries on Brown's body? jberryhill Aug 2014 #82
Is it possible to hit someone and not sustain an injury? JJChambers Aug 2014 #86
This is your OP: jberryhill Aug 2014 #89
This thread makes me sick, too many people who are looking for an excuse to write this one off TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #87
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
46. Meanwhile, he was wearing different clothes.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:28 PM
Aug 2014

Store footage shows different clothes than he was murdered in.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
72. Please don't misunderstand...
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:50 PM
Aug 2014

I believe that Michael Brown was murdered and I sincerely doubt that he had anything to do with 'stolen cigars.' I'm firmly on Michael Brown's side and that of his family and the people of Ferguson.

I don't know about facial hair. I haven't looked at the images from that perspective. My comment was about the clothing in the video as compared to the crime scene photo. They look to be the same to me. His shorts are down to his thighs in the crime scene photo and they appear to be 'sagging' in the store video. The color and style of shirt, shorts and shoes appear to be the same.

TYY

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
75. I could not tell from the shoes
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:53 PM
Aug 2014

In the pics posted in the thread the shoes are those ugly slider sandals that a lot of guys wear. In the picture of him lying dead on the pavement, I can't make out the shoes clearly.

SaltyBro

(198 posts)
2. That is not even a real assault on the clerk.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:02 AM
Aug 2014

We all did stupid stuff when we were younger, we didn't get shot for it.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
5. Those pictures absolutely show a real assault
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:13 AM
Aug 2014

It indicates that we may not have an accurate description of Michael Brown as a gentle giant as Rev. Sharpton described him.

There isn't enough evidence to say yet where the fault lies. A full inquiry may not result in the expected result of the cop being a racist murdered as many assume.

You say everybody does stupid things as a kid. What it one of his stupid things was trying to treat the cop like the pictures indicated he treated the store clerk? The person in these photos shows a willingness to shove people around.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
6. 1. It is an assault; looks like battery, too. 2. Crimes aren't mere "stupid stuff." 3. The murdered
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:15 AM
Aug 2014

needs no lame-arse "defenses" such as yours.

 

JJChambers

(1,115 posts)
8. I agree. We are not doing ourselves any favors by trying to minimize or cover up Brown's violence.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:25 AM
Aug 2014

It really is immaterial to whether or not the shooting was justified.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
9. Did he deserve to be shot and killed?
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:27 AM
Aug 2014

That's the question. Restrain him, take him to court, let him face justice. Dying for a petty crime is not "justice."

hamsterjill

(15,243 posts)
16. No! Let me stop you right there.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:33 AM
Aug 2014

This is definitely an assault. It is NOT okay to walk into a store and bully or harm a store clerk.

Let's not even go there. It is NOT okay to grab someone by their clothes and push them around. It is NOT okay to pass that type of behavior off as "stupid stuff" that younger people do.

 

phil89

(1,043 posts)
40. Not a real assault?
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:17 PM
Aug 2014

You're really not helping. Would you think that was on to do to someone in your family?? Unbelievable

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. Unfortunately, this plays into 'reasonable doubt' in most people's minds.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:05 AM
Aug 2014

It doesn't excuse what happened but without solid visual evidence of one sort or another...this is all messed up.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"
[/center][/font][hr]

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
7. And that's it exactly
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:16 AM
Aug 2014

Most people will go to their default opinions - i.e. "This proves that Brown was guilty." or "This just shows how corrupt and desperate the police are." I don't know - it seems like there are a lot of issues around how this police department handled this case and their relationship with the community they are supposed to be protecting. That's not in doubt even if Brown's guilt/innocence is.

Bryant

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
11. Or even "It's too complicated. I don't want to think about it."
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:28 AM
Aug 2014

Cameras on all public servants. The vast majority do their jobs but we need more accountability.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"
[/center][/font][hr]

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
12. Well actually that very succinctly expresses my opinion
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:31 AM
Aug 2014

It is complicated

I don't want to think about it

But being a good citizen means you have to think about complicated things you don't want to think about sometimes. Even more so for a public official.

Bryant

hamsterjill

(15,243 posts)
19. I agree.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:36 AM
Aug 2014

I see that very thing happening here on DU this morning.

Wouldn't it be a unique situation if minds were not made up until the investigation - a REAL investigation - was conducted and completed.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
26. 'reasonable doubt' about killing someone while the person is down on the ground after being shot?
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:50 AM
Aug 2014
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
51. Unless there is video, people will follow their preconceptions.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:34 PM
Aug 2014

There are witnesses but their credibility can be called into question.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
10. I was looking at this picture and compared it to the picture of him laying down.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:28 AM
Aug 2014

There is no way that the two are the same person, if they are basing it by clothes.

The color of the pants alone, as well as the shoes are completely different.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
15. The guy in the "assault" picture? It sure doesn't look like it.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:33 AM
Aug 2014

From the Red Cap, to the shoes, to the length and color of the "shorts/pants". It just does not look the same to me.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
21. We'll agree to disagree, since I just don't see it.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:39 AM
Aug 2014
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/michael-brown/#prettyPhoto
Which has the photo.
The shoes are different, the pants are completely different and a much lighter color.
No "Red" baseball cap either.
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
22. Baseball caps are easily ditched.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:41 AM
Aug 2014

Could have come off when he was trying to get away from the murdering cop, too.

Pants are identical, just a bit lower on his body than in the store.

Sandals are precisely identical. In fact, I'd call it unique. There's no way there would be two people with such identical footwear in photos taken within 30 minutes of each other.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
25. Too much of a stretch, and no, sandals are not unique. They don't even really look alike to me.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:49 AM
Aug 2014

The pants, are definitely different, the one in the store is far far darker.

Regardless, I think we both agree that even if he was the person in the store (which I don't think should matter, and I still don't think he is(I may yet be proven wrong)), this does not excuse or diminish the liability of the police officer, or how wrong this is.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
30. I do realize that as well. It just doesn't look the same to me.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:01 PM
Aug 2014

Either way, I can't go with 100% certainty.

Ms. Toad

(34,423 posts)
37. Look at the bottom left crime photo
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:07 PM
Aug 2014

with the dark underwear peeking out - and then look at the death photo, where the pants have fallen down further. You can also count the white bands in the sandals - there are 5 in both the death photo and the crime scene.

You're fooling yourself if you don't see a striking similarity.

Ms. Toad

(34,423 posts)
91. Johnson admitted it through his attorney.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 05:03 PM
Aug 2014
FERGUSON, Mo. (AP) - The friend who was with Michael Brown when he was shot and killed by a police officer near St. Louis over the weekend is reportedly confirming that he and Brown had taken part in the theft of cigars from a convenience store that day.

That word comes from the attorney for Dorian Johnson, speaking to MSNBC. Police in Ferguson had earlier announced that Brown was suspected of taking cigars from the convenience store in what was described as a "strong-arm robbery."


http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/local/2014/08/15/attorney-dorian-johnson-michael-brown-robbery/14118769/
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
62. It's brighter outside than in the store
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:43 PM
Aug 2014

Cheap surveillance cameras don't have a lot of dynamic range, and the scene in the store is backlit.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
65. I took that also in to account. I am not saying that it isn't possible that it is him, just that I
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:47 PM
Aug 2014

Don't think it is.

There is always that possibility, which is why I may be wrong, but it just doesn't look the same to me.
Even when you consider the light of the store.

What I do want to see is more on the upper left hand corner, which gives the time and date of the cameras.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
73. Ultimately, it does not matter one way or the other
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:52 PM
Aug 2014

Because the officer at the scene was not detaining him on suspicion of the robbery in the first place.

The point is that even if it was him, the use of deadly force was not justified.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
80. Yeah, I think everyone agrees with that.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 01:03 PM
Aug 2014

I just dislike this character assasination when it isn't even proven.

Ms. Toad

(34,423 posts)
41. One of my questions - which I haven't seen answered anywhere -
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:25 PM
Aug 2014

is whether the officer had seen the robbery scene photos - or had heard a description of the pair.

Shooting him was inexcusable, and from everything I have heard the officer should be relieved of duty and charged with some form of murder/manslaughter.

But if the police officer had reason to believe (because he had seen the photos, had heard the descriptions, or possibly even recognized the individuals) that he was encountering two individuals who had (at a minimum) just assaulted a store owner, the heat of the initial interaction over jaywalking is at least more understandable.

Ms. Toad

(34,423 posts)
28. Looks very much the same to me.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:57 AM
Aug 2014

Tan pants, falling somewhere between knee and ankle, shoes with alternating light and dark stripes, a white/light color shirt.

Are you perhaps confusing the color of his dark underwear (very visible in the death photo) with the color of his pants? (Not to mention that the dark underwear from the death scene is also peeking out above his shorts in the bottom left photo from the robbery scene.

We don't have to weave unbelievable tales about how it might be someone else, or it was, but it was just "dumb stuff" - not assault/battery/robbery. Even if absolutely true, none of those justify the police killing - any more than being a prostitute would justify rape.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
71. "Even if absolutely true"
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:50 PM
Aug 2014

Correct. It does not seem that the officer was detaining him for that incident in the first place.

Ms. Toad

(34,423 posts)
77. I haven't seen anything one way or another -
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:55 PM
Aug 2014

about whether the officer who shot him was aware of his alleged involvement in the robbery. If he was, it would shed some light on what appeared to be a major overreaction to jaywalking.

It doesn't justify shooting - but an officer who believed he was encountering someone who was encountering someone he believed to have just robbed a store in an altercation which included a physical interaction has more reason to be wary than someone chasing kids out of the street.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
13. This is what will let a cop get away with executing a man over cigars in the streets.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:31 AM
Aug 2014

Cop got to be judge and jury and handed down a sentence of immediate execution while the kid had his hands in the air.

hamsterjill

(15,243 posts)
20. No, he shouldn't have been shot for taking a pack of Sweeter Sweets.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:38 AM
Aug 2014

But he shouldn't be stealing things from a convenience store either, or assaulting a store clerk. That applies to whomever is depicted in the still photos, whether it be Michael Brown or someone who looks like Michael Brown.

Response to JJChambers (Reply #23)

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
35. Let's be Honest
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:05 PM
Aug 2014

The Cop will get off for murder,and nothing will happen to him Inless justice department pursures civil rights violations charges.

If Michael Brown's friend did tell FBI he did take the cigars I am inclinded to believe him although he denyed it was strong armed robbery.

I don't care if he sold cigars or not.This doesn't justify murder or the reaction by Police to protests.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
39. These pictures are not very good. What was Brown wearing when he was killed? Do they match
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:10 PM
Aug 2014

the picture because he did not have time to go home and change? Did he have anything on him that he had stolen in this robbery? There has to be more proof that a picture of a big black man pushing a clerk around. Is the person he was walking with in these pictures any where?

And even if it is him the policeman still has no right to play judge, jury and executioner.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
43. But the guy who shot Brown had not seen those images
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:25 PM
Aug 2014

He had received a radio call.

There is no way he could be confident he was stopping the right guy

 

JJChambers

(1,115 posts)
45. Well I don't know about that
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:27 PM
Aug 2014

A clothing and physical description (Brown was 6'4, 300 lbs), and the proximity to the crime scene, direction of travel, etc, could all have added up to the officer having plenty of reason to stop and identify Brown. Brown's reaction to that legal stop is what remains disputed.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
48. OK, go into a Missouri town
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:32 PM
Aug 2014

on a hot day, and have a look round to see how many people match or are close to the type of generic description used in such police broadcasts.

 

JJChambers

(1,115 posts)
49. It was the same guy. Its hard to argue that the officer didn't have a reason to stop him.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:33 PM
Aug 2014

He had just committed a robbery.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
54. GET F'n EVIDENCE
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:38 PM
Aug 2014

Not just spout the party line.

You have no evidence whatsoever it was the same person. All you have 4 grainy images of someone wearing similar clothes to Brown and the Officer who shot him did not even have those.

 

JJChambers

(1,115 posts)
57. It's confirmed, man.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:40 PM
Aug 2014

Same height, weight, clothing, and his friend (the witness to the shooting, Mr. Johnson, who was also involved in the robbery, confirmed it was him as well to the FBI).

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
67. No, I said evidence not an argument from authority
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:47 PM
Aug 2014

And again the officer who shot HAD NOT SEEN THE VIDEO.

A man was executed and the best excuse that the police can come up with is that the shots were fired on the suspicion that he might have been involved in a robbery.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
44. WATCH THE WHOLE VIDEO
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:26 PM
Aug 2014

These are cherry-picked stills. The young man tried to leave the store and was rudely accosted by the clerk. I for one can't blame him for pushing back.

 

phil89

(1,043 posts)
53. Yeah I don't think the clerk
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:38 PM
Aug 2014

Was in the wrong there. Just a smaller guy getting pushed around for rightly trying to defend his store.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
59. Mr. Brown was guilty of "shopping while Black"
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:42 PM
Aug 2014

He couldn't even leave the store without being accused of something and accosted. If anyone should be charged with anything, its the clerk.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
68. Not when he actually stole something
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:49 PM
Aug 2014

The clerk didnt stop him for being black he stopped him for stealing merchandise.

Response to Travis_0004 (Reply #68)

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
83. Or for not having ID to purchase tobacco products
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 01:13 PM
Aug 2014

If he was attempting to purchase tobacco products and did not have ID, that could also lead to a confrontation of some kind.
 

JJChambers

(1,115 posts)
61. Its already confirmed through Brown's friend that it was him.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:42 PM
Aug 2014

The clothing and height and weight match.

The reason it doesn't look like the pictures we have seen of Brown, who was an adult, not a child, is because the pictures released are from when he was younger.

Mojo Electro

(362 posts)
63. It's just really disappointing.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:44 PM
Aug 2014

It really seemed this time like we would finally make some progress on the police state in America. People were waking up, and were outraged.

That will probably all go out the window now, while all the boot lickers say "SEE???"

It really, really sucks.

Mojo Electro

(362 posts)
88. As much as this sucks
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 03:15 PM
Aug 2014

It's still possible that this office will be held accountable.

I still hold out hope that what happened with Al Jazeera will reap consequences.

Bit this was our best shot.

Sad.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
78. "what's to say he was beating the policeman who shot him?"
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:57 PM
Aug 2014

That's not a difficult question to eventually resolve on the basis of forensic evidence.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
82. The officer would fake injuries on Brown's body?
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 01:06 PM
Aug 2014

So if the autopsy evidence shows, for example, wounds on Brown's knuckles, you would say that the police officer faked them?

I think one of the witnesses would have noticed the police officer getting out of the car to fake wounds on Brown's hands, don't you?

When you punch someone, you bruise your knuckles. The edema is going to progress.

If you punch someone, and shortly thereafter your circulatory system stops, the wound to your knuckles is pretty much going to establish the time interval between when you punched someone and when your circulatory system stopped.

In other words, the condition of the wound you would have on your hand from punching someone yesterday, versus punching them a minute ago, are different.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
89. This is your OP:
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 03:51 PM
Aug 2014

"what's to say he was beating the policeman who shot him? Just the policeman's word?"

Answers to those questions are:

1. If an examination of Mr. Brown's body indicated fresh offensive wounds, it would be evidence of him having recently hit someone.

2. If an examination of Mr. Brown's body indicated absence of offensive wounds, one would have to ask a medical examiner whether that meant he did not hit someone.

I am not a medical examiner. Finding "something" may be indicative of "something". Finding "nothing" may or may not be indicative of "something" or "nothing".

Your question was directed to whether there could be any evidence of him "beating the policeman". Yes, there can be evidence of having beat someone, and how long ago one may have beat someone.

It is also important to understand what the word "evidence" means, as distinguished from what the word "proof" means, since people tend to confuse the use of those two words.

As to "Is it possible to hit someone and not sustain an injury?" I have no earthly idea. Many things are "possible". As a proposition, I would believe, absent further education on the point, that if one person was to hit another person without a weapon in a manner sufficient to inflict injury, then it seems likely one would have a corresponding injury of some kind.

Physics doesn't care if you slam your face into my fist, or whether I slam my fist into your face. Either way, it is a collision between bones wrapped in skin.

Various kinds of physical confrontations are reconstructed or rendered more or less likely from physical evidence all of the time, and some wounds can be characterized as defensive (such as stab wounds on the palms of a person trying to avoid being stabbed) or offensive (such as bruising to the knuckles of someone who has punched someone else).

It may also be that the evidence is indeterminate. If your skin is found under my fingernails, I may have been trying to restrain you, or I may have been trying to scratch you.

TheKentuckian

(25,106 posts)
87. This thread makes me sick, too many people who are looking for an excuse to write this one off
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 02:54 PM
Aug 2014

Another "good kill" because if a black kid isn't immaculate, if there is any possible room to take any imaginable reach at a theory to back a cop then it is taken like a fucking highway.

Any "boxes in the garage" will do, if your black and your transformation to "thug" will be complete.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Even if Brown did commit ...