Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 03:00 PM Aug 2014

A beautiful op-ed in the new yorker about transactivists and trans exclusive radical feminists

written by transactivist Julia Serano.

it addresses some important issues including

1. including the mostly false dichotomy between feminists and transactivists

2. what is silencing vs protests

3. how reporters who are naive about the lives of lgbt people, further skew this narrative.

Give it a read, especially if you are one of those people who opine on radical feminists/transactivism on DU. I certainly found it fascinating

In our email exchanges, I mentioned to Goldberg that I had recently read what Sheila Jeffreys wrote about me in her book Gender Hurts: A Feminist Analysis of the Politics of Transgenderism and found it to be vile. Being that you don’t usually cover radical feminists in The New Yorker, you probably don’t know much about Jeffreys other than what Goldberg wrote about her (which frankly, made it sound like Jeffreys is the feminist version of Salman Rushdie circa 1990, being shuttled around from secret location to secret location). Well, I am very familiar with Jeffreys’s work, as we are diametrically opposed on many feminist issues. For instance, in her book Beauty and Misogyny, Jeffreys claims that women who are feminine are that way because they are suffering from a form of Stockholm syndrome, whereas I think feminists should take feminine gender expression seriously. We also differ greatly on our views about sexuality, transgender people, the direction that feminism should take, and other important issues. But you probably don’t care so much about those details. You’d probably rather focus on the “catfight” between radical feminists and transgender activists, wouldn’t you?


http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2014/08/05/op-ed-open-letter-new-yorker
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A beautiful op-ed in the new yorker about transactivists and trans exclusive radical feminists (Original Post) La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2014 OP
Well worth reading - very thoughtful and made me aware of a lot of things I hadn't been. el_bryanto Aug 2014 #1
... La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2014 #2
That New Yorker showed up in my mailbox a few days ago. I thought about posting the article. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2014 #3
k&r tammywammy Aug 2014 #4

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
1. Well worth reading - very thoughtful and made me aware of a lot of things I hadn't been.
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 03:20 PM
Aug 2014

Thanks for sharing.

Bryant

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
3. That New Yorker showed up in my mailbox a few days ago. I thought about posting the article.
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 03:45 PM
Aug 2014

I thought it was a fairly even-handed treatment of this arcane conflict.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A beautiful op-ed in the ...