General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHelp Me Here - Would The CIA Carry Out Torture On Their Own Or Did They Have Orders/Permission......
to carry out torture (enhanced interrogation)? It seems to me that they would have had to have permission and that permission would have had to had come from BushCo.
Could this report and the Presidents comments the other day on torture be moving this in a direction that points the finger at BushCo?
TxVietVet
(1,905 posts)then throw the blame all over bu$h/cheney. It's going that way now. Obama put a stop to it because it was illegal the world over.
moondust
(19,977 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Yoo
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)the answer you are asking, is to conduct a thorough investigation, take this massive crime to a court of law, with witnesses and accused where the public can see for themselves just who was the final arbiter of these crimes. My guess is it will all lead back to Cheney and his 'secret government'.
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #5)
jwirr This message was self-deleted by its author.
shraby
(21,946 posts)Solly Mack
(90,763 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)and adamantly insisted it was not. They claimed it was "enhanced interrogation."
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Did they have such orders under Bush? Definitively.
Yes and yes.
edgineered
(2,101 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)My thought is there have always been individuals in the CIA who committed torture. However, it probably wasn't an official institutional policy until BushCo. My guess is Cheney ordered it, John Yoo crafted the" legal " justification. I think all parties concerned know their legal defense is extremely thin... and I think they cut a deal with Obama. Thats the only reason I can see for Obama covering for them (blocking the investigation, etc.)
global1
(25,242 posts)Seems to me the fact that he spoke about it in his press conference the other day is a way to get this all re-introduced back in the public eye and then let people like us make a big deal about it so that they have to deal with it in the open and ultimately come to the conclusion that this was authorized by BushCo; it was a war crime and that they have to be prosecuted for their crimes.
Obama's cover then is - I tried to keep you guys (BushCo) out of it - but the American People have spoken - and I have to deal with it now.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)... came from orders at the top, the very top. If Brennan wasn't carrying out Obama's orders, he'd have been fired.
The recent "admission" is merely a friday pm news dump, trying to get ahead of the story and put his spin out there.
global1
(25,242 posts)I'm going to watch and see how this plays out now and how the Senate treats this. I think it is time for the American People to become incensed about this and demand some action be taken. I'm thinking that if this happens it would no doubt lead to BushCo and there would be no way to prevent Obama from moving on them. He'd be obligated to as the President to take some action.
After all in his comments the other day - he admitted that it was wrong. This is just my humble opinion.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)based in the intelligence community, that answers to no one--not Congress, not the president, not the American people.
On edit: I also think the Cheney/Bush administration was all-in with the worst elements of the rogue agencies, and that they loosened any restraints that might have remained on such operations.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)against orders, why aren't they on trial?
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)that came out of the Cheney's office. The CIA were far from alone in torturing. It became common among military interrogators.
Torture has occurred in the past. The difference is that it was officially sanctioned by the White House under Bush, but of course they did not admit it was torture. They called it "enhanced interrogation."
bemildred
(90,061 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)they have their own agendas