Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 08:26 PM Jul 2014

The Typical Household, Now Worth a Third Less

Economic inequality in the United States has been receiving a lot of attention. But it’s not merely an issue of the rich getting richer. The typical American household has been getting poorer, too.

The inflation-adjusted net worth for the typical household was $87,992 in 2003. Ten years later, it was only $56,335, or a 36 percent decline, according to a study financed by the Russell Sage Foundation. Those are the figures for a household at the median point in the wealth distribution — the level at which there are an equal number of households whose worth is higher and lower. But during the same period, the net worth of wealthy households increased substantially.

The Russell Sage study also examined net worth at the 95th percentile. (For households at that level, 94 percent of the population had less wealth and 4 percent had more.) It found that for this well-do-do slice of the population, household net worth increased 14 percent over the same 10 years. Other research, by economists like Edward Wolff at New York University, has shown even greater gains in wealth for the richest 1 percent of households.

For households at the median level of net worth, much of the damage has occurred since the start of the last recession in 2007. Until then, net worth had been rising for the typical household, although at a slower pace than for households in higher wealth brackets. But much of the gain for many typical households came from the rising value of their homes. Exclude that housing wealth and the picture is worse: Median net worth began to decline even earlier.

more

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/27/business/the-typical-household-now-worth-a-third-less.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Typical Household, Now Worth a Third Less (Original Post) n2doc Jul 2014 OP
Is that a bad thing, really? MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #1
But the bottom of the rung families got their bush tax cuts! BillZBubb Jul 2014 #2
Which is weird, considering these are the wealthiest times in history. Octafish Jul 2014 #3
How sad it it that I'd be happy with just a third less at this point. progressoid Jul 2014 #4
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
1. Is that a bad thing, really?
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 08:48 PM
Jul 2014

We think it's great, 'cos *we* got all that money.

Game over, losers.

Regards,

America's Bankers

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
2. But the bottom of the rung families got their bush tax cuts!
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 08:52 PM
Jul 2014

That surely made up for the loss of net worth!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
3. Which is weird, considering these are the wealthiest times in history.
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 09:32 PM
Jul 2014

So. Where did the money go from the middle class?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Typical Household, No...