White House: Assad regime does not deserve to rule Syria

[tabatha]

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 21, 2011
Statement by the Press Secretary on Syria

The United States continues to believe that the only way to bring about the change that the Syrian people deserve is for Bashar al-Assad to leave power. The words of the Assad regime have no credibility when they continue to be followed by outrageous and deplorable actions. Only two days following the Assad regime’s decision to sign the Arab League initiative, they have already flagrantly violated their commitment to end violence and withdraw security forces from residential areas. The United States is deeply disturbed by credible reports that the Assad regime continues to indiscriminately kill scores of civilians and army defectors, while destroying homes and shops and arresting protesters without due process. While Syrian security forces have also taken casualties, the overwhelming majority of the violence and loss of life in Syria stems from the actions of the Assad regime, and we call on all parties to put an end to violence.

Time and again, the Assad regime has demonstrated that it does not deserve to rule Syria. It’s time for this suffering and killing to stop. It’s time for the immediate and full implementation of all terms of the Arab League agreement, including the full withdrawal of security forces, the release of political prisoners, and unfettered access by monitors and international media to all parts of Syria. It’s time for the Syrian people to have the universal rights that they deserve. The Assad regime is already facing growing isolation and sanctions that are choking off its resources. We urge Syria’s few remaining supporters in the international community to warn Damascus that if the Arab League initiative is once again not fully implemented, the international
community will take additional steps to pressure the Assad regime to stop its crackdown. Bashar al-Assad should have no doubt that the world is watching, and neither the international community nor the Syrian people accept his legitimacy.

http://columlynch.tumblr.com/post/14566502846/white-house-assad-regime-does-not-deserve-to-rule

[atreides1]

1. Haven't we heard this song before

Only the last time it was Libya, and before that it was Egypt...Egypt is still ruled by the military, and the "allies" in Libya are coming close to fighting each other.

Is it now US policy to bring unstability to the Middle East?

[tabatha]

2. Revolutions and democracies are messy.

South Africa still has problems, and seems to be going backwards under Zuma (see press and visa restrictions).

The military in Egypt - there will be a second revolution to get rid of them.

The Libyans, for the most part are far happier now - but they have to sort out local issues that they could not under Gaddafi. It may take a second revolution, but people there are listening.

Just as the US has its issues, with competing factions, all democracies will have that. Except that after 200+ years, the US dissent is mostly non-violent. For new democracies, that may not be the case.

And a poster on AJE wrote this about Germany:

"Shortly after reunification Germany experienced a breakdown of law and order. The Rostock-Lichtenhagen pogrom triggered a number of arson attacks on accommodations and homes for asylum seekers. This spread like wildfire. Citizens not professionally involved in politics gathered in round table discussions discussing ways to restore a sense of security."

If you think that after a revolution, things will be perfect - then that is a huge fallacy. Wherever there are people, there is dissent. The difference is whether it can be expressed openly. For years, the people in the Arab world remained silent. Now they are noisily demanding their rights. It is messy. But it is participation.

See for more background:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100252474
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100252245