General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe left's swift boating of John Kerry is disgusting, moronic and offensive
It shows me, when you rip away the layers, the left ain't no different than the right in attacking and vilifying someone based on absurdities never uttered.
Frankly, when you get down to it, John Kerry is far more a hero, in every measure of the word, than Edward Snowden - who has consistently lied and ran away from responsibility. Kerry owned his words, returned home and stood his ground - despite the threats from the right, and even his government run by one of the most corrupt, and untrustworthy presidents in American history.
Comrade Eddie isn't even worthy of cleaning John Kerry's boots.
DU really is turning into a site run by the extremes - people who vilify the cult of personality of Obama supporters and yet blindly back the much more dangerous cult of personality of Glenn Greenwald and Comrade Eddie. Scary stuff.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)They're the right pretending to be the left.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)There is no equivalence first off. This is a horrible analogy. No lefties swiftboated Kerry. Is this post trying to be sarcastic? Snowden is most definitely getting swiftboated. I personally don't know the people doing it so I can't say if they are righties pretending to be lefties or establishment lefties so entrenched in supporting the establishment because it has a lefty figurehead that they will not see through the lies.
Response to billhicks76 (Reply #86)
Post removed
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)My mind ability to reason occupy a space where sanity and facts reside.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,315 posts)Will you start using 'liberal' in the same way too?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,315 posts)I wish the wave meant you were leaving DU, never to come back again. You pollute this site:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3173564
You waved when you wrote that too. You seem to use it as a middle finger.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Otavalo Ecuador. So your post means a lot to me. Thanks.
Of course San Francisco de Quito (which was the first city declared to be a National World Heritage Site in 1978 by UNESCO) and Cuenca not to mention the Galapagos can hold a candle to the yummy awesomeness that is North Carolina.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)actually Libertarian at its core? Please explain further - my brain apparently isn't big enough to comprehend that.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)Winner of Asinine Comment of the Day.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...posts at DU.
My mother always said I should avert my eyes from someone making an embarrassing spectacle of themselves, but I can't help myself.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)It's amazing what gets posted here but I'm all for the free flow of ideas. Comments like this just expose oneself true beliefs as unworthy of deep discussion.
Occupy = Libertarian?? When did ALL the left ever support anything, and why would we want to? Dems are the party of individuals not sheeple - in general. Left swiftboating Kerry? So are you calling the Bushies lefties now? LOL
dbonds
(4,793 posts)Have to read the signs.
merrily
(45,251 posts)times, as have words like center right and conservadem. (I've often engaged in the second type of comment.) And, in my observation, today's Democratic Party is center right, for the most part, although I think I have been detecting some change since 2010.
I am not sure if a counterpart of the division in the real world, or if that is a message board phenomenon. If it is like that in the real world, the party may need to stop worrying about building bridges to Republicans and the 1% and start worrying about building bridges within the party. Or maybe they think they can just wait until "the hippies" cease being active in the Party?
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)They also don't even bother to give a reason why he should leave - other than they don't like him.
I suggest that they instead read Obama'a West Point speech -- and read Kerry's University of PA speech on fighting non state terrorism. One thing that is clear is there are echoes of Kerry's call to work with other countries and his constant push that intelligence and international law enforcement should be used rather than invading countries. (I love Obama's use of an old saying -- saying of a military - that just because you have the best hammer, does not mean everything is a nail.) Seems to me that Obama and Kerry are on the same page on foreign policy and national security.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,315 posts)You don't make your case that someone will receive a fair trial by using your privileged position as Secretary of State to call him a 'traitor'. It's prejudicing any trial you'd like to give him.
I called Bush 'dim' for doing the same thing, and it's dim of Kerry to do it too: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=146968&mesg_id=149001
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)and I think it's offensive that those who point that out are called right-wingers for opposing programs that were put in place or enhanced by Bush, just because it's now Obama at the helm.
Leme
(1,092 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)mocked on this board as recently as yesterday. It's probably hard to advocate for the presumption of innocence and use death drones on the same day.
War Horse
(931 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)From what I gather from his round of publicity interviews, he has been pushing this idea; and it appears in his book.
I assume he shared it with Obama when he was his Secretary of Defense. Probably Hillary and others, too.
hlthe2b
(102,266 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Democratic Underground - Read the comments
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023064050
Obama branded a war criminal in the Irish Parliament - read the comments on this one too.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023067394
The Dems are starting to wake up and smell the coffee.
We should join forces.
Don't mention Ron Paul on DU you will get eviscerated (they are still brainwashed over that).
Just mention his policies - the ordinary Dems love lots of them.
Anti bankster
Anti war
Anti Corporatism
etc. etc.
http://www.dailypaul.com/290123/one-rule-for-the-rich-and-one-rule-for-the-rest-banksters-snowden-nsa
Take a look on Democratic Underground
They have the gov't paid trolls out, trying to limit the outrage & rebellion on there.
If that is the reaction of hard core Dems to the news stories on the NSA, I want to stoke up some more of it.
Lots of traffic on DU.
It's the most popular Dem internet site, except for Huffy Po - where everything meaningful gets censored.
http://www.dailypaul.com/288556/clapper-and-feinstein-get-caught-lying-big-time#comment-3103138
So the theory isn't as far fetched as you'd like to pretend.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)wink wink. Too bad my posts never have or will support your innuendo. Which means any such innuendo is pulled straight from one's ass.
merrily
(45,251 posts)What happens now? Will you be putting Manny in message board jail? Or is having a different view from yours a capital offense?
BootinUp
(47,144 posts)onecaliberal
(32,856 posts)After what little boots and Darth did without even a sign from the right makes this all the more disgusting.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
merrily
(45,251 posts)It would have made perfect sense in 1984. Trouble is, some here don't see it as at all dystopian.
Orwell is in his grave, unable to decide if he is horrified or vindicated or amused.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)We aren't stupid.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Some may be simplistic dupes, but the most vocal one are transparently shills for Rand Paul & the radical libertarian RW.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)and love to create much havoc and much hatred.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)While Kerry is not a John Adams or a Thomas Jefferson, he is a hell of lot closer than Ed Snowden.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)armed with a thumb drive full of the news that tyranny is coming.
Or some such bullshit.
Sid
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)waiting for someone to tell us which one of these true heroes fled the country to Russia, by way of China.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)photographic evidence:
sendero
(28,552 posts)... why should anyone worry about it?
Autumn
(45,082 posts)YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)...being kind.
Autumn
(45,082 posts)YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)...
Number23
(24,544 posts)YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)...agree on many things. Probably more than we disagree about.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)I gave $200 in October 04 to John Kerry's Legal fund that was created so he could challenge election results.
Ohio was fixed - it was obvious. But Kerry gave up without a fight - without a whimper. Never even asked to have the provisional ballots checked out. Just gave up.
I was ashamed to have backed him. I was one of the top 10 posters on his Campaign blog that year - and spent countless hours pounding on doors for him - and was a campaign worker in my township Pittsburgh on that rainy Election day, remember driving in the rain for hours delivering meals to the lawyers we had stationed at every polling site - and got totally drunk as I watched Ohio be stolen right in front of our eyes at the official Kerry election night party in Station Square.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)during the final days of the Kerry campaign. I walked and drove three precincts in one day to try to get Kerry elected. So I am a huge Kerry fan but his remarks about Snowden were downright wrong. The government should not be collecting so much of our personal information. Sorry that the government's foreign surveillance was lost in the foray, but, hey, a government that snoops on its own innocent, law-abiding people cannot be trusted with that much information about anyone.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)Disagree on feelings about Kerry himself but that is neither here nor there.
His calling out of Snowden was wrongwrongwrong. Truth needs to shine out no matter the source. Darkness and secrecy are the bane of freedom and truth.
treestar
(82,383 posts)What's the point if it is as corrupt as Comrade Eddie's defenders say? He cannot possibly get a fair trial here, the courts are so screwed up and corrupt and unfair. Thus Kerry wouldn't have gotten a fair shot either.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)And your denigration of Edward Snowden sounds like the talking point of the day. Try again.
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)And you know it...
I will never understand thar still Alive nasty need to bash Kerry for almost every actions he makes....and especially when it comes the ten years old rancor of 2004. ..
Sad the way how msm washed your brains
Autumn
(45,082 posts)Hekate
(90,681 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)for years even after '04, despite what happened.
Now I see a pattern - just like all the Democrats in power, they get more upset when the left 'attacks' them than when the right does.
Curiouser and curiouser.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)
russspeakeasy This message was self-deleted by its author.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)4now
(1,596 posts)this is what the far left does best.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)The almost left? The right playing like they are left? reagan loving democrats who love the middle and hate what the party used to stand for?
Response to 4now (Reply #10)
HangOnKids This message was self-deleted by its author.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)...when you use weasel phrases like 'Comrade Eddie' to make your point, you've made me very VERY suspicious of the information and opinion you bring to light. The same is true if someone were instead to post good things about Snowden and then refer to SoS Kerry as 'Imperial John' (I just made that up, so if someone is using that it is purely coincidence!).
IMO, it doesn't take a 'brave man' to return home and 'stand' for something knowing that it means the end of your life. That's what I call a stupid man. Even if courts and history show his actions to be perfectly reasonable (and only in a joke of a justice system would they not), he would still go to prison for life. So all else aside, and regardless of his intentions, I think the call to return home is pretty lame.
erronis
(15,242 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Oh wait, we tried that. Damn!! All that work and they stole the election right out from under us/him. The DU is called the underground because we didn't like that the establishment D's above ground, LIHOP.
Autumn
(45,082 posts)acceptance of policies (enacted by bush, for the most part) that we don't agree with we are disgusting, moronic and offensive ? Fuck that shit. I'm as much a Democrat as you or anyone else and certainly more so than Kerry. You don't like DU ? You have plenty of other choices, no one is forced to come here or post here.
Rex
(65,616 posts)railing against someone that says 'both parties are the same'.
I wish these people would be consistent in their narrative.
Autumn
(45,082 posts)I save my outrage for politicians and their miserable failed policies, not my fellow Democrats.
Rex
(65,616 posts)that was then played off as sarcasm. Yeah you are right...this is so predictable, they need a new line and a new outrage.
Autumn
(45,082 posts)YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)...and consistent supporter of Elizabeth Warren?
Autumn
(45,082 posts)last man to die for a mistake? It helped me deal with the loss of my Brother.
Since he has become SOS he has really begun to support the government line. Maybe when you become a career politician your view on right and wrong changes. My view of him has changed over time. My question is, How do you ask a man to face life in prison for bringing a conversation to the American people on the violation of their constitutional rights?
Instead he says He should do what many people who have taken issue with their own government do, which is challenge it, speak out, engage in an act of civil disobedience,"
Yeah that will work with the new procedures the government has adopted.
merrily
(45,251 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Listen to Obama. On various occasions, he has referred both to "my friends on the right" and "my friends on the left." And, in both cases, it is clear he is referring to people with whom he does not share a political philosophy.
It's all about the center right now, baby! Everyone else is a pretender.
Move right, joyfully, and with gratitude to your leaders and fellow center right voters, or understand that you are not a "real" Democrat. Except, of course, during election season, when you are expected to donate, volunteer and vote Democratic. (They don't actually need volunteers as much as they used to, but it builds esprit de corps and adds to the illusion of populism, thus helping to GOTV.) Come Wednesday morning, though, it's thank you ma'am and back to business and usual, emphasis on business.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)It's that a small number of people who CLAIM to represent the left are in fact doing more to hurt Democrats and the vast majority of the left, and helping the right.
Rex
(65,616 posts)then who exactly are these people hurting? Other people on this board? Sorry, not buying it. I see people pretend that this site is anti-Obama and spend all day harping on it in GD...how are they helping the party again, I must have missed that memo.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)They are a tiny fraction of the liberal base (and an even smaller fraction of the party as a whole), but they're loud.
Thankfully they don't have that much influence in the real world either.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Ability to tolerate peaceful dissent is a characteristic of the left. Feeling threatened by peaceful dissent is a characteristic of the right.
And DU is a political message board. Is a post here, rebutted or not, really a threat to the USG, with all its resources?
I'm sure they'd much rather have us venting here than demonstrating in public view, or more.
merrily
(45,251 posts)If the left is really the right, then the left is not part of the "real" Democratic Party. At best, we are considered an extreme, the Democratic equivalent of the Tea Party. Not mainstream Democrats. Not "real" Democrats. (Unless or until we talk voting third party, but that's another issue. We are expected to be Democratic at the polls and reviled everywhere else.)
The bit about the two parties not being anything alike is a skoosh more difficult, but also easy, if you remember that it's all about appealing to the base on the base's cultural issues. Things like war vs. peace, authoritiarianism vs. the Bill of Rights and so on--those differences are barely discernible anymore, to be sure.
Republicans are frankly corporatist and also either members of the extreme religious right or frankly pandering to the extreme religious right. Hence, anti-choice and anti-feminist and downright bizarre about members of the GLBT community. On the other hand, Democrats court corporatists while giving lip service to "the middle class," "the poor" all but disappearing from the public speaking). And they are vastly superior on cultural issues, no bout adoubt that whatsoever.
So,, basically, you have your candidd corporatists, who are culturally fire and brimstone, straight from the 18th century pulpit, and your kinder, gentler and more covert corporatists.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)crew. They pule and rail about how bad DU is and how it doesn't represent Democrats. The posters all suck and are RW moles pretending to be left. Ad nauseam.
There is a perfectly nice website out that that one of our PPRed members runs. Democrats4progress or something like that.
It has the exacting standards that they say they crave and yet the place is a ghost town.
I dunno, if I hated a place as much as some of these folks I certainly would not marinate in it's horribleness.
Weird mindset.
Autumn
(45,082 posts)There are quite a few members and you are right, the members there are the ones who rail against anyone here who does not walk in lockstep with them. They have a nice real time chat room but I never see any comments there, unless you have to have a certain amount of posts to join in the conversation. It seems nice there you would think the place would be buzzing. They adore Nance and complain she was driven off from here, she posts there and the times I looked only a few people from there comment and the ones here who are members don't have anything to say. I don't get it, makes no sense to me at all.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)If driven off means she had less then 100 percent breathless adoration for her scoldy tomes.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)busterbrown
(8,515 posts)I blame a lot of this shit on Kerry!!!
When these guys first called him out.. He should have immediately got on a plane to Texas and told these guys to meet him face to face where they could repeat the lies as men.. I actually believe he should of taken a fucking swing at one of them for fucking with his Service Honors..Probably would have won him the election!!!..
karynnj
(59,503 posts)I can understand that there is a large group of people who respect or admire Snowden and think that the crimes he committed in leaking classified material were done out of patriotism.
I can understand a difference of opinion. There are people - who politely, without attacking Kerry, argued that Snowden acted for good reasons.
It is sickening how quickly people who consider themselves progressives forget the liberal, progressive record that Kerry has that spans over 3 decades. Snowden, on the other hand, appears to be a libertarian and not all that well informed.
The fact is that NOTHING Kerry said - other than "man up" -- is anything other than what anyone in government would say in this situation. Snowden is a fugitive and he has proudly admitted to leaking classified information - the crime he is accused of. Given Kerry's position, he CAN NOT take a position that this is ok or that there should be some kind of deal.
I also do trust Kerry when he says that Snowden has harmed the US - not just because he is honest, but because I read article and article on meetings that Kerry or Obama had - all over the world - where within a paragraph or two, it was mentioned that they had to deal with the anger people expressed due to things Snowden leaked. (Some were not even US documents - Could this impact what they are willing to share going forward?)
frylock
(34,825 posts)really?!
Response to frylock (Reply #39)
Post removed
frylock
(34,825 posts)run along now.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)So he must be smart or something!
karynnj
(59,503 posts)both Europe and Latin America where relations were impaired by the leaks.
Now, I KNOW that people will speak of Maduro and his verbal attacks on the US. However, what many did not see was that one thing that Kerry did early on (I am sure with Obama's knowledge and approval) was to reach out to LA speaking of a new relationship - saying the Monroe Doctrine was not their policy. Everyone knows that the Monroe Doctrine was the root of most of the US intervention all over Central America and South America. (You might remember the right went insane - a good sign that this was good and significant.) Before this could lead to any improvement in relations, the US was hit with the leaks. Things done long before Obama suddenly created outrage from Brazil to Venezuela .
If you knew Kerry's history, Kerry himself should have had more credit than most Americans - as it is known that he investigated and spoke against what was done in our name in support of the Contras. I may be totally off base, but it may be that those leaks destroyed a major opportunity to change US foreign policy in Latin America in a way that would greatly improve relations. As it is, those revelations amplified the already very deep distrust.
In Europe, there is the contrast between the first few months of Kerry in Europe - with leaders who have known and trusted him for decades and the less enthusiastic meeting afterward. (It could be media descriptions but that is what I saw in articles.) Another difference was that the public in many countries was delighted that he spoke at least some of their language. ( His French was good enough that one ad hoc meeting between the Iranian FM, the French one and Kerry was conducted in French as they scrambled to get a final deal. )
I am not saying anything was permanent - though it is troubling that Merkel and Obama still have a pretty cold relationship. However, the Ukrainian crisis does illustrate that the bilateral and group relationships are still very functional.
Where I will agree with you is Russia - there it is our - and their policies. No matter how professional or how friendly our SoS and their FM are - and they get along better than any other pair in the last decade - they are diametrically opposed to what the other wants done at this point.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)excessively broad surveillance program by our NSA. I suspect the programs simply got out of hand like mold growing in a dark, wet environment -- because they were secret and hidden and no one noticed them until they started creeping up on the carpet. But I do like Kerry. And I hope that Obama's speech about not trying to resolve every small conflict with military power will become reality. I credit Kerry for inspiring that speech to a great extent.
Peace is so important now. We have serious problems to deal with. One of course is the loss of privacy, the personal space we each need to restore our sanity, that has come with the new technology we have. Another is saving our environment. Another is sharing the bounty of the earth in a world in which much of the work we used to do with our hands is done by robots and other machines.
We have a lot to do. We cannot afford to throw explosives at all our problems. That is what Rodgers did -- throw explosives at his sexual frustrations. We can't do that. And Kerry knows that better than anyone. I disagree with his comments about Snowden. They seemed to come from a place of personal frustration rather than from understanding. But overall, Kerry is doing a great job. We need more like him.
YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)G_j
(40,367 posts)"swiftboating" is making shit up.
randys1
(16,286 posts)I wasnt crazy about Snowden when I heard he was a Ron Paul supporter, but when it comes to something as important as this stuff I cont care who the messenger is.
I am also not blaming Obama for what was in place and on a roll a long time ago...
Demeter
(85,373 posts)So, Ignore. Hasta la vista, baby.
merrily
(45,251 posts)those who posts abound in unintentional irony?
You can't just buy unintentional irony in a store, you know.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)So people are making up fake facts about him here? Can you show me some of those posts of out-and-out lies?
Because that's what "swift-boating" means, remember?
progressoid
(49,990 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)progressoid
(49,990 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)poor, poor John Kerry. swiftboated yet again. Maybe this time John will "man up" against the liberals, like he failed to do against conservatives in 2004.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)people need to "educate up".
frylock
(34,825 posts)so I can only assume that those who use the phrase are conservatives, and likely always have been conservatives.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)over the "Comrade Eddie" remark.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)On national TV? On something sure to be re-broadcast over and over? How do you get an open-minded jury after that?
"Potential jurors will ignore the remarks of the Secretary of State of the United States of America."
Sure to work.
I wonder what would happen if the Reagan Democrats on here put just half their energy into fighting the actual right, instead of slandering the left......
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Brilliant.
merrily
(45,251 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Comrade Eddie at least had the strength of character to sacrifice for what he believed in.
John Kerry couldn't even muster the courage to vote against the Iraq War.
If he wasn't from the Forbes family, no one would have ever heard of John Kerry. And then maybe we would have had a candidate capable of beating Shrub.
Lost what respect I had left for Kerry after his pathetic blundering gave us 4 more years of Chimpy.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Response to Jamaal510 (Reply #70)
HangOnKids This message was self-deleted by its author.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)No public official cares what we say. Doesn't mean it isn't true.
Bet he doesn't sleep easily though
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)Or maybe it was Nov 3rd...resting while his law team geared up for the challenge...wait - there was no challenge...
JI7
(89,249 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)The RW has proven that is a successful method.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)?
imthevicar
(811 posts)He gets what he deserves!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)toby jo
(1,269 posts)I don't know, but I'm guessing he thought that was one fine pass.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)"When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security."
- John Kerry
Then hundreds of thousands of people died, and the slaughter continues today.
Most Congressional Democrats voted against going to war; Kerry voted the other way. Pick one:
1. Kerry made the right choice
2. Kerry made the wrong choice because he's not very bright
3. Kerry made the wrong choice because he is corrupt
If there's another reasonable possibility, I'd appreciate being educated on what it is.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Several whistleblowers before Snowden blew loud and clear, warning Americans that something wrong was being done to us, but we didn't get it. We ignored them because they didn't present documents showing us what was happening and we thought our country and our leaders were better than they apparently are.
So Snowden came along. He brought documents. He sacrificed himself.
The NSA could have trimmed their programs to a reasonable amount of spying when the quieter whistleblowers first spoke up. But instead they turned their wrath on the whistleblowers and made their lives miserable.
Honesty does not pay at the NSA.
That's the lesson.
The personalities of Glenn Greenwald and Edward Snowden are what they are. Edward Snowden seems to me to be a rather shy, quiet nerd. Glenn Greenwald is a lawyer -- almost by definition an in-your-face fighter however quiet he may choose to be about it.
Kerry is one of my favorite people, but he is part of the establishment that was so full of itself and so blind as to the rights of the American people as to collect the records of our phone calls, e-mails, etc. for, if the NSA so wished, perhaps perpetuity, saving them for future reference by any bully or dictator or hacker who wanted access to them.
The government can be wrong. It can be right. It can be evil. It can be goodness itself. It depends on who controls it. And as long as the NSA is collecting our metadata, we may think we are in control but we aren't.
I forgive Kerry for his statements about Snowden because I know that he is in a system that he dare not offend. The information about foreign matters that we were getting from our excessive surveillance system was probably helpful to secretaries of state. They had foreknowledge of what their friends and foes were up to. Had the system moderated and controlled its greed for private information, had it respected the right to privacy of law-abiding American citizens, it could have collected the information it needs for centuries without being stopped.
But somehow, no one, not even Kerry, the Viet Nam hero, had the courage to ask whether maybe the collection of almost all American metadata and some personal correspondence just might violate the spirit if not the letter of the Fourth Amendment and whether it might meet with the wrath of the better informed American citizens.
I've been in jobs in which I was too intimidated to speak up. Not speaking up always ends badly. Why? Because when you don't speak up, you store up your feelings of resentment that things aren't fair. If you are in a job in which you don't dare blow the whistle when it needs to be blown, don't dare express an opinion, see if you can find another job. Non-profits are hiring. Good luck.
That applies to you, John Kerry. You are still my hero.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)blue neen
(12,319 posts)Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)I campaigned for John Kerry.
But I was shocked and sickened when he tin-soldiered onto the stage at the convention and did that little boy salute and spouted his "ready for duty" schtick. I knew then that he wasn't going to make it, that he was the victim of the advisor class. That would be the same advisor class that keeps "advising" Obama.
And if you aren't one of "the left", why are you on DU?
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Hard to believe that Comrade Eddie inspires this much devotion. It's Obama Derangement Syndrome, USA Derangement, and now being enraged at Kerry for merely stating an opinion? Deranged.
Looks like anyone who "disrespects" their hero Snowden is doomed to be thrown under the bus. I guess it's OK do bash the president on a daily basis, but don't you dare say a bad word about Snowden and Greenwald. Wonder who will be next on their list to throw under the bus?
merrily
(45,251 posts)It's only about whether you agree? No, that can't be right, either because you called out people who "seem to" want lockstep and seem unable to tolerate disagreement.
Not about insulting one group of DU'ers. Not about the difference between posting insults on the same thread vs starting a separate call out thread. Not about disagreement with your vview. I wonder what it possibly could be then?
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Good post.
K/R
merrily
(45,251 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)I have been too busy responding to attempts by others to smear Snowden and Greenwald.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Snowden and Greenwald are decoys. Whether posters support Snowden and/or Greenwald or attack them, the real battle is won. The real target, the USG, is protected either way.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)I don't particularly like Greenwald, and I haven't figured out Snowden, but I despise the smear campaign against them. I suppose that I do contribute to the deflection from the real issue by engaging those who stoop to smearing them.
TACFIRE13
(9 posts)With all we've learned about rendition, indefinite detention, Guantanamo, drone-clipping civilians, who would be brain damaged enough to trust the Bush/Obama legal system?
If he had spilled the beans he'd have had an "accident."
If Snowden had owned a big bank he would have been ignored and maybe even given taxpayer money.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)It's getting really old.
perdita9
(1,144 posts)I don't know what Snowden is yet. From his interviews, 'raging narcissist' describes him best
corkhead
(6,119 posts)of your assertion "Comrade" Drunken Irishman
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Go ahead and post a Snowden lie that you can prove. I'm tired of people claiming Snowden is a liar when Snowden hasn't been caught telling a single lie thus far. Snowden haters have been caught it lots of lies. NSA itself has been caught in lies. Snowden has not.
Let me know if you have what it takes to make this interesting.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)You are asking for truth? Not happening, too busy stomping his boots.
marble falls
(57,081 posts)DU makes me smarter every time I log on. I see things here usually first. I stay away from rooms I know that will angry for no better purpose. But definitely, Kerry is being mope slapped for no good reason, again.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)I thought "swift boating" meant lying about someone's (specifically John Kerry's) past record and then using that to bring him down in the present.
Is that what you're seeing on the left and on DU?
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
KG
(28,751 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)What's Mr. Kerry's position on James Clapper who lied to congress about the extent of NSA spying?
Can higher level government employees be considered traitors and face prosecution?
840high
(17,196 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)took on war criminals, bankers, and companies that wreck the environment how the left keeps harping on when they keep enforcing the rule of law like they promised they would.
What's that you say? They never actually did any of that stuff and only attack people that don't have the money or power to fight back while people that do walk away with no consequences? Y'all have a very different definition of "hero" than I do.
But by all means, prove me wrong by pointing out a group with money and power this administration or anyone representing them has attacked with half the viciousness they turn on whistleblowers. And by "attacked" I don't mean sternly worded speech followed by giving them mostly what they want.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)"people say that Kerry's past heroism was good and real but that doesn't excuse his current yellowness, so he can't really be yellow, it's just another example of how great he is"
if Snowden becomes SoS for 2040 and calls someone who exposed galloping illegalities that made Orwell look cute we'd lay into him too
but you wouldn't, so you think we wouldn't
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)arikara
(5,562 posts)other than being used in this case to stir things up?
No wonder people get turned off by this place.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)TPP, the left that wants to save our water supplies from big oil fracking. The left that worries about of Constitutional rights as the Big Brother NSA/CIA/FBI stomp all over them. The left that believes that the loss of habeas corpus is important. The left that supports whistle-blowers, protestors, investigative journalists, and outspoken Congress-people. And because you and your "Group" are a long way away (to the right, no less) from those stands, I can easily see how you think the left is extreme. You guys would have thought that our founders were extremists.
To me the extremists are those that think calling Snowden and Greenwald names, like in jr. high, is the most important issue here.
"Comrade Eddie". Really?
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)There are most certainly people on the left that are extreme just as there are on the right, to deny that is to deny reality. You know damn good and well that's what he was getting at. You don't need to make shit up to argue a point.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)as opposed to just disparaging him and his comments?
The Swift-boaters LIED about him.
As best as I can tell, it is a false metaphor for this situation.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Good post, DI.
Sid
Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)such odious fuck to Defense. Even assuming warts the size of Everest, Kerry is easily one of Obama's very best appointments.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Corruption Inc
(1,568 posts)Some people huh?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)without a drone assassination program and a kill list.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)mattclearing
(10,091 posts)Translates directly to, "Please do not take me seriously."
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Tommymac
(7,263 posts)neither is John Kerry.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Tommymac
(7,263 posts)I sacrificed a year of my activist life working to get him elected ...then he showed his true colors. Bitter? Damn right I am. 21st century Kerry is nothing more than a bought and paid for pol. Methinks the 70's Kerry would agree.
And by the way - I am a member of the Democratic Party's left Liberal Progressive wing and damn proud of it. No wishy-washy centrist here.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)The rest of what you said is cliché nonsense that gets said about any politician that pisses you off. I can't take that shit seriously.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)All it does is advertise that the person saying it is someone who likes to engage in the ugliest Rovian rhetoric.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Does not mean what you think it does.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)A) Accepted responsibility for their wrongdoing and treacherous betrayal of the American people, or...
B) Ran away from it?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...a decade now.
Lets be honest about this shit. Until the courts or Congress take action, the folks at the NSA are doing their jobs and aren't breaking any laws to do so.
Logical
(22,457 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I'm just saying, post 9/11, a few overreaching laws and a few Supreme court cases with shitty outcomes and we have a situation where this whole thing has so far been deemed legit by every authority in government. I'm not saying they are right, but I'm saying that's how it is and thus, operating under those parameters, you can't say that NSA employees are themselves being treacherous or criminal.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Because I'd basically be repeating the same thing.
merrily
(45,251 posts)not breaking the law the only standard by which you want to judge the conduct of your government?
Kinda hard to break the statutory law when you also get to write the statutes.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Some on DU are defenders of the system. Some are defenders of the party. Some are defenders of human rights and civil liberties.
I don't understand why it is so hard for other to understand this. It really is so simple. I also don't understand why DUers take criticisms, or even insults, of Kerry, Obama or any other politician personally. They are politicians! For fucks sake, the people should be criticizing their every move. We should be holding them under a microscope and w should feel free to insult them if that is what we want to do. That is part of our democratic process. Those of you who take such criticisms personally should step away from political discussions. Because, ultimately, what is said here on DU doesn't matter. DU is a clean well lit bar to complain and argue politics. When you take it personally, or make it personal, you lose.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Response to Whisp (Reply #167)
Post removed
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)The media used to hold politicians feet to the fire at least a little.. Now they all get a free pass! Of course people are going to scrutinize them, no one else is.. A university study just came out and found the US is turning into an oligarchy... So the land of the free and beacon of Democracy you want Snowden man up and return to is an Oligarchy? Why isn't the media "manning up" and asking real questions? Why aren't the Democrats "manning up" and demanding justice when it comes to Wall Street?
These people leave office and get fat off of the very corporations who pay for their elections and retire millionaires. We've placed them in an elite position of trust. Time to stop idolizing them and remind them who they're working for.
Logical
(22,457 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)I think a lot of folks took you seriously.
JEB
(4,748 posts)and do something to bring the runaway spying under control. That should be of greater concern than punishing those that revealed the spying.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)There are hundreds of things that he could do from the position he is in - given, of course, Obama's approval. What he has done is to increase the idea of diplomacy first. As a Senator in 2007 and 2008, he was against the FISA bill and was one of the people who joined Dodd in speaking out on the original bill.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It's a right-wing culture mag cofounded by Gavin McInnes, currently of Takimag, yes that Takimag. So when it puts up articles like this one recently posted here:
https://news.vice.com/article/john-kerrys-moronic-and-dangerous-snowden-comments
I think it's fair to call it the RWNJ's swiftboating of Kerry, basically the same RWNJs who did it last time.
Leme
(1,092 posts)is a great threat nationally and internationally. John Kerry may think this internet collecting is fine or necessary, but I do not believe this has been thought out as for consequences farther than the next election or next security breach.
Unrepentant Fenian
(1,078 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)EndlessMaze
(46 posts)On KPFK in Los Angeles please check Background Briefing. I like Mr. Masters because he always looking to figure out the truth wherever is goes. He's spent a large amount of time reviewing this. Archives at ianmasters.com .
merrily
(45,251 posts)I admire your capacity for hope.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)and I love how he called out Gary Null and the other nutjobs at kpfk
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)The left is right, but the people defending right wing policy makers are left. Natch.
merrily
(45,251 posts)While most think Orwell was prescient, I think the joke's on him. He wrote 1984 to shame Russia for allegedly being so very different from the West, in terms of "Big Brother watching you," Newspeak, etc. I wonder, if he could come back, would he be horrified, or would he, too, join the "It's all good, as long as my guy is (or my guys are) doing it" club, too?
cali
(114,904 posts)but I've always thought he was a pompous windbag and a gigantic hypocrite. He's an opportunist and nothing but.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Not long on insight, but that would be only a hindrance when your goal is insulting your fellow DUers.
Hateful, that's the ticket!
nikto
(3,284 posts)Are awesome to the max.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Uhh... not trying to be rude here but where the HELL have you been for the last 5 years, DI? This place is Leftist Nihilist Central and has been forever.
Home of the "America should burn/Repubs should take over so that it can be rebuilt" "liberal"
The shit all over Dems, give Repubs a pass "liberal"
The "black folks and women should be quiet because their issues divide us" "liberal"
The "everyone who agrees with us is wise/noble/good and everyone who disagrees is evil, but we don't march in lock step" "liberal"
The savaging of John Kerry will just fall in line behind the savaging of every other Democrat these people hate with an undying fever while howling to the moon how they are the Democratic Party's base. It would be funny if it wasn't so fucking deranged.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)since we are reading a different site.
And that word you keep using, leftist, you really have no clue what it means.
Number23
(24,544 posts)at two completely different realities.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)since I see attacks on a mythical left every day and twice on Sunday... and they are left standing.
Number23
(24,544 posts)in GD. And judging by the characteristics I've already detailed, "left" is the last thing I would call them.
frylock
(34,825 posts)oh. my. stars.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)If that doesn't sum it up I don't know what does. And you also earned a response from the person who epitomizes that dynamic the most.
But don't get too excited, I'm sure you are now on "Iggy" for daring to offer a different point of view.
Number23
(24,544 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Kerry is not a traitor, Snowden can not even light a candle in Kerry's world. If the US never sees Snowden back on our soil then it will be Snowden's loss.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)when he returned home and denounced that friggin war. I can't help but think "young" Kerry would agree with Daniel Ellsberg's comments about "old" Kerry calling Snowden a coward and a traitor.
"As for Kerry saying that -- I'd say a man that I once admired, that was a long time ago -- the statement that he made on [MSNBC] that Edward Snowden is a coward, a traitor, and he betrayed his country is one of the most despicable statements I have heard from a politician or anyone else who I can remember. It is very much to his discredit and I think very much the less of him."
-Daniel Ellsberg
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Then Ellsberg and Snowden has totally betrayed the USA. Their despicable actions against the USA should ever be forgiven.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Where does Ellsberg say anything about Kerry betraying his country for coming back from Vietnam?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)And Ellsberg wants to call Kerry a traitor and coward. No, Ellsberg needs to look at his deeds.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)He didn't say anything negative about Kerry service in Vietnam. What "deeds" are you referring to?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)And a lot of it is the same old recycled shit the GOP used in 2004 - and which was lambasted & debunked at the time here on DU.
More proof that it's not The Left who's behind Snowden & Greenwald.
mikekohr
(2,312 posts)They are not alike however. One is a group of craven, contemptable liars the other, well meaning over zealous idealogues. I'll tolerate the latter and condemn the former.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I know of no one at DU who advocates for the confiscation of Private Property
and organizing the Workers into collectives and communes.
So WHERE is this "Far Left".
Are you pointing at traditional, mainstream, center FDR/LBJ Democrats who believe that the Democratic party should represent the interests of the Working Class and Organized LABOR?
Is THAT who you are calling the "Far Left"?
Javaman
(62,530 posts)what's this all about now?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)really? You can't find something else to judge him on but need to use that to criticize him?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)'cause you've sure rustled some jimmes with this thread.
Sid
rep the dems
(1,689 posts)Raising a glass to you, Drunken Irishman
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I loved him when he was a fiery Patriot who spoke out against an illegal war and undemocratic government practices.
But something happened to him, and now he serves as a Mouth Piece
for those who start illegal wars and abuse their authority.
So sad.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Betray our country. Kerry fought for liberties and freedom, one of those freedoms was to have freedom of speech. He has the right to his opinion. There is not any proof Kerry has delivered information he stolen. Has Snowden received a medal? BTW, Ellsberg also called the Vietnam War unjust.
BrainMann1
(460 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)That is what America needs today - people with the courage to stand in solidarity with our leaders who love us and care about us and against those who are always complaining.
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)A lot of post here are filled of 2004 rw FAUXNews recyclef garbage stuff against JK. AND YOU VOTED FOR HIM BACK THEN...
will you one day try to understand him.... you czrtainly know every pol while in administration has not the free speech he had in previous tenure
And for all that skull and bones nonscanda
Kerry was fir years a lone hero in Congrès while investigating Iran Contra and BCCI. he risked hiq career and even got death treats.... is that a corporate acring?????
Mind yourselves folk. Please