General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI find the phrase "slut shaming" offensive
If two people commit consensual adultery, both parties are wrong and other people have the right to call them out on it. Labeling it as "slut shaming" implies 2 things: The first thing it implies is that Monica behaved slutty and the second implication is that people are unfairly chastising her for acting slutty. Having sex doesn't make one a slut. Neither does having sex with a married man. Criticizing an adulterer is not slut shaming. It's calling out dishonest and hurtful behavior.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)You'll have time for nothing else. Monica is old news. Her 15 minutes was over 15 yrs ago. I see no reason to devote any gray matter to her or her affair with Bill Clinton. Just because something is on TV doesn't mean we need to worry about it.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I'm sorry that the whole thing has been resurrected.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming
fried eggs
(910 posts)that has no place in the Monica/Bill discussion. I really don't care about the Bill/Monica thing, but I saw the phrase "slut shaming" thrown around 1 too many times.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)no one else has the right to call them out on anything.
fried eggs
(910 posts)But I don't want to get too far off topic. The point I'm trying to make is that the phrase "slut shaming" implies that the woman in question is a slut.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)It still identifies a woman as a "slut".
I even just made a post using the expression, and it made me cringe. Now I just have to edit it. I don't want this expression I dislike so much becoming normal to me.
G_j
(40,367 posts)them of being a slut.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)fried eggs
(910 posts)it's used to describe
1) a man or woman who consistently has many different sex partners and/or
2) a man or woman who consistently and reliably has sex with any random person (or stranger) who asks for it and/or
3) allowing multiple men/boys to take turns having sex in one sitting
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)It's only acquired the connotations of promiscuity more recently; originally it came from "slattern".
"Farewell, rewards and fairies,
Good housewives now may say
For now foul sluts in dairies
May fair as well as they".
Warpy
(111,255 posts)are far worse.
The truth is that this is none of your business. Why not take the time you presently waste on thinking about a tacky affair with an overheated groupie and see to something that needs attention in your own life? My guess is that you're like the rest of us and there is plenty out there for you to do.
This fascination with the sexual hijinks of the rich and/or powerful is a distraction, anyway, from the far more pressing issues of the day, like increasing funding to alternative energy to decrease global warming and raising the minimum wage to the point people can live on it without food stamps and Medicaid.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)I, for one, don't want to know what goes on in the bedrooms of the rich, famous, and/or powerful. They're people, too, who have to brush their teeth, use the toilet, and put their pants on one leg at a time-just like the rest of us! And besides, I (and most others here) don't even know them on a personal level, fer crying out loud! Do we really think we are accomplishing anything productive by finding out what (or who, if you prefer) other people are doing in bed?
And agreed, there are so many more important issues. Far, far more important issues. Enough of this tabloid gossip; it's embarrassing.
Warpy
(111,255 posts)and people would use us as their confessional. I learned to smile and nod pleasantly when they'd start describing their kink and I kept thinking over and over that I really didn't want to know that much about them or anybody else.
That applies to the rich and/or powerful. I just really don't want to know.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)and I will stop using the phrase "slut shaming".
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Just sayin'.
Hekate
(90,674 posts)Apparently my qualifying my judgments regarding the Newt Gingrich/Ken Starr/Clinton/Lewinsky nightmare by calling both of the consenting adulterers "fools" was inadequate to cover for my having used the dreaded S-word regarding the female party. My post got hidden, which is nearly a first for me, but I had company in my cell as there were several other hidden posts in that particular thread as well.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)There's a specific definition.
Use it.
Know it.
Its not offensive. Its descriptive.