General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStates Are Running Out Of Excuses To Refuse To Expand Medicaid
By Tara Culp-Ressler
Accepting Obamacares optional Medicaid expansion could be a better financial deal for states than initially predicted, according to new data from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
Expanding Medicaid to extend health coverage to additional low-income Americans will cost about a third of what the CBO projected earlier this year, according to the agencys updated estimates of Obamacares financial impact. Back in early February, the CBO estimated that state spending on Medicaid and CHIP would be $70 billion higher over the next decade because of the expansion. Now, that figure has been revised down to $46 billion.
Ultimately, states will only need to spend about 1.6 percent more on their public health insurance programs than they would have spent in the absence of health reform. And thats before the potential long-term savings from Medicaid expansion like the benefits of providing increased mental health treatment to low-income people are factored in.
Health reforms Medicaid expansion, which many opponents wrongly claim will cripple state budgets, is an even better deal for states than previously thought, Edwin Park, the vice president for health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the independent research group that first flagged the revision, noted.
The CBO revised its figure down because the agency predicts that most of the people signing up for Medicaid will be newly eligible under expansion, and the federal government will pick up the cost of their enrollment. States have been worried about what health policy experts call the woodwork effect essentially, as Obamacare enrollment raises peoples awareness about their health options, people who could have signed up for Medicaid before health reform took effect will come out of the woodwork and enroll. States have to pick up a larger portion of the cost for those people. But CBO officials now expect the woodwork effect to be smaller than initially projected, which means states costs will also be smaller.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/04/25/3430824/states-excuses-medicaid-expansion/
Gothmog
(145,176 posts)There is a group pushing the theme that Texas left me out to try to get the people being punished by Texas motivated to vote.
TlalocW
(15,381 posts)They love federal money as much as anyone else, and it would make them look good to save their states money, but on the flip side, helping poor people makes them dry heave or worse, and remember, the president is STILL Black...
TlalocW
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"They love federal money as much as anyone else, and it would make them look good to save their states money, but on the flip side, helping poor people makes them dry heave or worse, and remember, the president is STILL Black... "
...for why they want people to die.
GOPer Squirms On Obamacare: 'I'm Not Saying It Hasn't Worked For Some People'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024869985
ladjf
(17,320 posts)of the denial of the Medicaid expansion.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)by Joan McCarter
Nice message, Arkansas Democrats!
That's Democrats reminding voters, particularly women, that Republican Tom Cotton, who is running for Senate, wants to take their insurance away from them by repealing Obamacare. And, so far, he hasn't put forward for how those 155,567 people, who have coverage through the state's private option Medicaid expansion, will get replacement coverage.
That's a pretty good message for motivating women, and anyone who cares about people having health care, to get to the polls in November.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/24/1294360/-Arkansas-Democrats-use-Medicaid-expansion-to-rally-women
IDemo
(16,926 posts)I don't see this resulting in a "come to Jesus" moment anytime soon for my governor or in any other neon red state.