Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStopRush Has Destroyed Limbaugh's Business For Good? PREMATURE
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/spocko/55448/the-magic-and-beauty-of-hiding-behind-front-groupsThe Magic and Beauty Of Hiding Behind Front Groups
Front groups like the Heritage Foundation, Freedom Works and Americans For Prosperity can deflect connection and responsibility from individuals, corporations or brands who love a "no regulations ever" message, but can't be seen supporting a sick and twisted host or his comments.
<...>
If you, as the person driving a message, find that activists have developed and harnessed a customer facing advertiser alert programs that challenges their brand, you work to remove those sponsors identities from the equation. Then you give them the option of funding you via the 'cut out' front group, like the Chamber of Commerce does.
<...>
The consumer facing advertisers were (and some still are) a weak link in the game. They could be convinced to move away from Limbaugh. However dark money doesn't care about what anyone thinks. They can "lose" money for decades on an influential narrative shaper, because they ARE getting an ROI. The advertisers could measure their short term ROI with new sales. But the front groups don't have those short horizon metrics.
They are earning the money that they beg for every year from donors by pointing to their cultural impact. They have:
Reinforced that climate change is a hoax.
Positioned government health care as a terrible thing.
Supported a version of capitalism with no constants, no taxes and no regulation as "Uniquely American"
Given their customer facing donors cover from irate employees, shareholders and potential customers who would be appalled at their real views
And that's the beauty of front groups. They can do the bidding of the worst impulses of individuals and corporations. They often don't have to disclose where the money came from or where it goes. The kind of popular pressure that would work on a person, corporation or brand, is diffused. A company can say, "We aren't commenting on that person. We don't sponsor them on the air." And if they are asked if they sponsor various front groups? "That's confidential."
Front groups like the Heritage Foundation, Freedom Works and Americans For Prosperity can deflect connection and responsibility from individuals, corporations or brands who love a "no regulations ever" message, but can't be seen supporting a sick and twisted host or his comments.
<...>
If you, as the person driving a message, find that activists have developed and harnessed a customer facing advertiser alert programs that challenges their brand, you work to remove those sponsors identities from the equation. Then you give them the option of funding you via the 'cut out' front group, like the Chamber of Commerce does.
<...>
The consumer facing advertisers were (and some still are) a weak link in the game. They could be convinced to move away from Limbaugh. However dark money doesn't care about what anyone thinks. They can "lose" money for decades on an influential narrative shaper, because they ARE getting an ROI. The advertisers could measure their short term ROI with new sales. But the front groups don't have those short horizon metrics.
They are earning the money that they beg for every year from donors by pointing to their cultural impact. They have:
Reinforced that climate change is a hoax.
Positioned government health care as a terrible thing.
Supported a version of capitalism with no constants, no taxes and no regulation as "Uniquely American"
Given their customer facing donors cover from irate employees, shareholders and potential customers who would be appalled at their real views
And that's the beauty of front groups. They can do the bidding of the worst impulses of individuals and corporations. They often don't have to disclose where the money came from or where it goes. The kind of popular pressure that would work on a person, corporation or brand, is diffused. A company can say, "We aren't commenting on that person. We don't sponsor them on the air." And if they are asked if they sponsor various front groups? "That's confidential."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 747 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
StopRush Has Destroyed Limbaugh's Business For Good? PREMATURE (Original Post)
HomerRamone
Apr 2014
OP
Faux pas
(14,672 posts)1. Rachel did a piece on this the other night.
An eye opener for sure.
Zooj
(11 posts)2. Limbaugh has lost a lot of advertising
Major advertisers have left. Only some little ones remain.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)3. I think the point of the OP is even without advertisers
There are people who would subsidize him on the air. To bloviate and blather, maybe by overpaying for ads on another clear channel program or is it liberty media.