Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 11:08 PM Mar 2012

Polygamy, child brides and providing birth control. It's all the same.

Everyone understands that even if it's church doctrine, marrying off and raping 12 and 14 year olds is not acceptable in the eyes of the law. Having 17 wives all on welfare because one hubby cannot provide enough food, is not only morally but even legally dishonest. They are prosecutable in the eyes of the law.

When a law requires that every woman be given the opportunity to obtain insurance coverge for birth control is being touted as a government slam again religion, how is this law any different than the government trampling all over a church's doctrine by prosecuting men who have multiple wives and child brides?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Polygamy, child brides and providing birth control. It's all the same. (Original Post) Sheepshank Mar 2012 OP
Probably should have posted this question on a Freep type site Sheepshank Mar 2012 #1
I saw the post as arguing *against* all these things eShirl Mar 2012 #3
This does not represent the public or official policy of the LDS church. Polygamy dimbear Mar 2012 #2
Do you mean FDLS? Sheepshank Mar 2012 #5
No, I mean LDS. As in Mitt Romney type LDS. dimbear Mar 2012 #6
so who said I was talking about LDS? Sheepshank Mar 2012 #7
Absolutely, they (FLDS) are a repulsive group. The worst. I'm just amplifying and broadening dimbear Mar 2012 #8
Quakers object to war taxes quaker bill Mar 2012 #4

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
2. This does not represent the public or official policy of the LDS church. Polygamy
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 01:28 AM
Mar 2012

as an ideal is now reserved for a future more perfect time, a time when the LDS church has more political power. While it is of course true that the highest rungs of salvation are reserved to men who are plurally married, such plural marriages cannot be sanctioned openly at this time.

Also, it would be more convenient not to discuss this publicly. TIA.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
7. so who said I was talking about LDS?
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 11:39 AM
Mar 2012

trampling all over the freedoms of a religion would also apply to FLDS...no?

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
8. Absolutely, they (FLDS) are a repulsive group. The worst. I'm just amplifying and broadening
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 10:26 PM
Mar 2012

your good work. People don't know much about the Mormons, because the Mormons don't want to be known about.

That's why bishop Romney never talks about his faith. Unfortunately for him, the secrets have gotten out.

I know I don't sound very liberal, going on about the Mormons as I do, but it's personal.

The LDS church right now in 2012 finds nothing wrong with polygamy. They can't because it's the backbone of their history. They do find it illegal, and because it's illegal it's banned. IIRC, it will get you excommunicated. But it's still the spiritual ideal. Is it any wonder Mormons practice polygamy under the table?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Polygamy, child brides an...