Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court lets stand lower court ruling against law that would have defunded Planned Parenthood
Supreme Court lets stand lower court ruling against law that would have defunded Planned Parenthood
by Meteor Blades
Another victory Monday in the battle over funding for Planned Parenthood brought cheers from the organization and its backers. The Supreme Court chose not to review a district court ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Betlach upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The decision means a permanent end to a 2012 Arizona law that sought to prevent women covered by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) and other state-assisted healthcare programs from using organizations or physicians that provide abortions to obtain birth control, cancer screening, treatment for sexually transmitted diseases and the like. The district and appeals courts ruled that the state law violated the federal Medicaid Act, which protects women's healthcare decisions. As is customary, the Supreme Court made no comment about why it chose not to review the case.
Jim Nintzel at the Tucson Weekly writes about the ultimate defeat of the Orwellian-named Whole Womans Healthcare Funding Prioritization Act:
Federal law forbids states from discriminating against qualified providers of such services. The Arizona law disqualified Planned Parenthood on the grounds that its services include abortion.
Eight federal courts have now ruled in the past three years that states cannot exclude organizations from providing preventive healthcare services to women. The Supreme Court declined to take up another of those rulingsin Indianalast May. Of Monday's decision:
There was recently another defeat for Arizona's forced-birthers. As of last week, Planned Parenthood is again providing medication abortions at its facility in Flagstaff. Because of a 2011 state law, nurse practitioners were excluded from providing medication abortions. Only physicians could do so. Consequently, Planned Parenthood stopped providing the abortions at several of its locations, forcing northern Arizona women seeking abortions to make what for some was a long trip to Phoenix or Tucson.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/24/1280071/-Supreme-Court-declines-to-review-ruling-overturning-Arizona-s-law-that-defunded-Planned-Parenthood
by Meteor Blades
Another victory Monday in the battle over funding for Planned Parenthood brought cheers from the organization and its backers. The Supreme Court chose not to review a district court ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Betlach upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The decision means a permanent end to a 2012 Arizona law that sought to prevent women covered by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) and other state-assisted healthcare programs from using organizations or physicians that provide abortions to obtain birth control, cancer screening, treatment for sexually transmitted diseases and the like. The district and appeals courts ruled that the state law violated the federal Medicaid Act, which protects women's healthcare decisions. As is customary, the Supreme Court made no comment about why it chose not to review the case.
Jim Nintzel at the Tucson Weekly writes about the ultimate defeat of the Orwellian-named Whole Womans Healthcare Funding Prioritization Act:
Planned Parenthood Arizona President and CEO Bryan Howard called the Supreme Court's decision "a victory for Arizona women and their families."
The men and women of this state have the right to see the health care provider they deem is best for them," Howard said in a prepared statement. "Thousands of low-income women rely on Planned Parenthood for breast and cervical cancer screenings, birth control, and other basic health care. Politics should never interfere with a womans access to vital services."
Federal law forbids states from discriminating against qualified providers of such services. The Arizona law disqualified Planned Parenthood on the grounds that its services include abortion.
Eight federal courts have now ruled in the past three years that states cannot exclude organizations from providing preventive healthcare services to women. The Supreme Court declined to take up another of those rulingsin Indianalast May. Of Monday's decision:
Let this be a lesson to politicians across the country: These dangerous and unconstitutional laws wont be tolerated by the courts or the voters, Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, said in a statement. Over and over again, courts have clearly said that states cant block people from getting preventive health care at Planned Parenthood.
There was recently another defeat for Arizona's forced-birthers. As of last week, Planned Parenthood is again providing medication abortions at its facility in Flagstaff. Because of a 2011 state law, nurse practitioners were excluded from providing medication abortions. Only physicians could do so. Consequently, Planned Parenthood stopped providing the abortions at several of its locations, forcing northern Arizona women seeking abortions to make what for some was a long trip to Phoenix or Tucson.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/24/1280071/-Supreme-Court-declines-to-review-ruling-overturning-Arizona-s-law-that-defunded-Planned-Parenthood
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1701 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (38)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court lets stand lower court ruling against law that would have defunded Planned Parenthood (Original Post)
ProSense
Feb 2014
OP
Imagine that. Some things are even too bat-azz crazy for these conservative justices.
politicaljunkie41910
Feb 2014
#3
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)1. K&R
Great news.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)2. This is great news. I hope this is the end
of the attacks on PP,but I won't hold my breath.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)3. Imagine that. Some things are even too bat-azz crazy for these conservative justices.
But unfortunately, another day, another bat-azz crazy filing I'm sure, somewhere in the heartland of rightwingnut Amerika.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)4. Great news!
We can use each and every victory!
justhanginon
(3,290 posts)5. They think they are on a mission
so it will probably never end. These SOBs always seem to be able to come up with money and lawyers to file another lawsuit. The war on womens rights continues ad nauseum!
riqster
(13,986 posts)6. A rare piece of good news from the Roberts Court. K & R.
merrily
(45,251 posts)7. Surprised and pleased.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)8. Kick! n/t