Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 02:52 PM Feb 2014

Filthy Rich But SECRETLY TERRIFIED: Inside the One Percent’s SORE-LOSER Backlash


Why are the super-rich whining so much? They rigged the game for themselves, but are terrified of being discovered




Pompous weasels................





What explains the toxic mélange of entitlement and shame that’s driving the raging One Percent sore-winner backlash? From Tom Perkins comparing the ultra-rich to Jews during “Kristallnacht,” to tycoon and newspaper-destroyer Sam Zell insisting “the top 1 percent work harder,” to investment banker Wilbur Ross proclaiming that “the 1 percent is being picked on for political reasons,” there’s an epidemic of plutocrat self-pity afoot. Just last week ex-CEO Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack told the media to “stop beating up on” CEOs Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein after they got obscene raises from JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. The sore winner backlash is odd timing. There’s no longer any real movement to hike taxes on their income or their wealth, both of which are at all time highs. President Obama has said an increase in tax rates is “off the table.” There’s no more discussion of the “Buffett Rule,” named for the Berkshire-Hathaway oracle who famously suggested his secretary should no longer pay higher rates than her boss.


Almost nobody talks about ending the “carried interest” loophole that lets hedge fund managers pay a shamefully low rate on much of what should be considered income; instead there’s a “boom in trusts passing carried interest to heirs,” the Wall Street Journal reports. Yes, they’ve figured out a way to pass that unfair advantage onto their heirs through new estate-tax dodges. Sadly, Occupy Wall Street has fizzled, so they can even enjoy Zuccotti Park unaccosted. So why all the whining now? I read Kevin Roose’s buzzy “I crashed a secret Wall Street society” piece Monday morning looking for insight. You should read it if you haven’t. It’s a fun hate-read. You’ll come away thinking, if you don’t already, that a lot of these people are monsters.


Apparently the secret fraternity Kappa Beta Phi gathers the titans of Wall Street at the St. Regis once a year for a gala that celebrates their wealth and power and mocks the rest of us. New inductees to the fraternity are charged with putting on a variety show to entertain the long-tenured. The evening features all the standard bad behavior common to male societies, from sports teams to military units to the boys of the Bohemian Grove. Cross dressing? Check. After cocktail hour, the new inductees – all of whom were required to dress in leotards and gold-sequined skirts, with costume wigs – began their variety-show acts.


Misogyny and homophobia? Check.

The jokes ranged from unfunny and sexist
(Q: “What’s the biggest difference between Hillary Clinton and a catfish?” A: “One has whiskers and stinks, and the other is a fish”)
to unfunny and homophobic
(Q: “What’s the biggest difference between Barney Frank and a Fenway Frank?” A: “Barney Frank comes in different-size buns”).

Mocking the loser-outsiders, who paradoxically make their great wealth possible? Check.

One of the last skits of the night was a self-congratulatory parody of ABBA’s “Dancing Queen,” called “Bailout King.”



When Roose was discovered, he was ejected from the ballroom, and the story wound up in his new book, “Young Money,” a portrait of eight entry-level Wall Street traders, which came out today. The Kappa Beta Phi story was excerpted in New York magazine. What the excerpt captured was the insularity and paranoia of plutocrats who band together to protect themselves from mostly imagined social approbation and self-doubt. As Paul Krugman has argued, they aren’t like the titans of yore who made things; they “push money around and get rich by skimming some off the top as it sloshes by.” They’ve gotten insanely wealthy mainly by rigging the rules of the game to privilege the world of finance, and it’s no wonder they’re worried the rest of us will some day figure that out.





cont'


http://www.salon.com/2014/02/18/filthy_rich_but_secretly_terrified_inside_the_one_percents_sore_winner_backlash/
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Filthy Rich But SECRETLY TERRIFIED: Inside the One Percent’s SORE-LOSER Backlash (Original Post) Segami Feb 2014 OP
Link? WilliamPitt Feb 2014 #1
Oops! Segami Feb 2014 #2
they are sociopaths...they cannot "feel" the pain of other humans... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #3
Even better question, why is there a picture of Donald Trump mixed in? Rex Feb 2014 #4
You're not sure about Mitt being in the 1%?! reformist2 Feb 2014 #5
Have no idea, do you? Rex Feb 2014 #7
Sounds like you don't know what the top 1% includes. reformist2 Feb 2014 #8
Okay so you have nothing constructive to add. Rex Feb 2014 #9
Please Google what it takes to be in the top 1% - you'll learn something! reformist2 Feb 2014 #10
I already know all about the 1%, but thanks for the small waste of time! Rex Feb 2014 #12
Back in the 70's libodem Feb 2014 #6
Let me just say this: Brigid Feb 2014 #11
"...The New York Times' code of ethics states if you are asked,... Segami Feb 2014 #13
I'm ready to storm the barricades... JNelson6563 Feb 2014 #14
Why are the super-rich whining so much? Blus4u Feb 2014 #15
A link to the original story eggplant Feb 2014 #16
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
3. they are sociopaths...they cannot "feel" the pain of other humans...
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 02:56 PM
Feb 2014

they simply cannot relate....they believe they are born "better" than everyone else...

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. Even better question, why is there a picture of Donald Trump mixed in?
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 02:57 PM
Feb 2014

Unless you think they need a mascot, in which case I agree. Trump is hardly close to the 1% mark. Not so sure about Mitt either.

libodem

(19,288 posts)
6. Back in the 70's
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 03:05 PM
Feb 2014

My dad tried to teach me what was so hazardous about passing down massive amounts of unearned wealth . It made sense but this type of a scenario makes it so much more abundantly clear. Death tax my ass. The inheritance tax should be high enough not to create megalomaniac psychopaths forming a plutocracy. It will be the death of Democracy, if we don't get a grip.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
11. Let me just say this:
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 03:17 PM
Feb 2014

There were a couple of scenes in "The Dark Knight Rises" that had me snickering quietly to myself.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
13. "...The New York Times' code of ethics states if you are asked,...
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 04:13 PM
Feb 2014
...you have to identify yourself as a reporter. So I didn't say much to anyone, and no one asked who I was until very late in the dinner when I took my camera out to take a picture. The guy next to me sort of grabbed me and said, "There are no pictures allowed in here—and by the way, who are you?" And I had to tell him. It was like a bomb had gone off in the room! Everyone stopped what they were doing. They saw their careers sort of vanishing before their eyes. Then a few of the members took me out into the hall and started trying to trade favors and say, "Well, if you don't report on this or you take it easy on us, we'll become good sources for you in the future. We'll pick up the phone when you call." They actually thought that would work.



http://www.motherjones.com/media/2014/02/interview-young-money-kevin-roose-crashes-exclusive-wall-street-fraternity

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
14. I'm ready to storm the barricades...
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 04:30 PM
Feb 2014

Now, how many comfortable 99%s would join? Probably not many.

Julie

Blus4u

(608 posts)
15. Why are the super-rich whining so much?
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 04:31 PM
Feb 2014

Could it be that they hear the 2 minute warning sounding on their rigged game.....
and know that retribution is coming?

It is getting harder and harder for them to hide behind the shrinking Republican Party and they know that the rest of us are on to the con of the Cruz's, Paul's, et al.

The wealth disparity continues to gain more circulation among the populace and is mentioned more and more in the national media.

I'm just sayin'

Peace

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Filthy Rich But SECRETLY ...