General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Wolf of Sesame Street: Revealing the secret corruption inside PBS's news division
On December 18th, the Public Broadcasting Services flagship station WNET issued a press release announcing the launch of a new two-year news series entitled The Pension Peril. The series, promoting cuts to public employee pensions, is airing on hundreds of PBS outlets all over the nation. It has been presented as objective news on major PBS programs including the PBS News Hour.
However, neither the WNET press release nor the broadcasted segments explicitly disclosed who is financing the series. Pando has exclusively confirmed that The Pension Peril is secretly funded by former Enron trader John Arnold, a billionaire political powerbroker who is actively trying to shape the very pension policy that the series claims to be dispassionately covering.
In recent years, Arnold has been using massive contributions to politicians, Super PACs, ballot initiative efforts, think tanks and local front groups to finance a nationwide political campaign aimed at slashing public employees retirement benefits. His foundation which backs his efforts employs top Republican political operatives, including the former chief of staff to GOP House Majority Leader Dick Armey (TX). According to its own promotional materials, the Arnold Foundation is pushing lawmakers in states across the country to stop promising a (retirement) benefit to public employees.
Despite Arnolds pension-slashing activism and his foundations ties to partisan politics, Leila Walsh, a spokesperson for the Laura and John Arnold Foundation (LJAF), told Pando that PBS officials were not hesitant to work with them, even though PBSs own very clear rules prohibit such blatant conflicts. (note: the term PBS officials refers interchangeably to both PBS officials and officials from PBS flagship affiliate WNET who were acting on behalf of the entire PBS system).
http://pando.com/2014/02/12/the-wolf-of-sesame-street-revealing-the-secret-corruption-inside-pbss-news-division/
Armstead
(47,803 posts)hunter
(38,362 posts)... now we ourselves have got something more insidious.
Cha
(298,313 posts)now Russia but I do know that I never laughed at the Soviet Press. It's horrible for them and it's tragic for us, too.
We fight it every single day with the NET/Social Media-Tweeters United!
Cha
(298,313 posts)corporatemediawhore bandwagon.. would be the shortest list.
Thank you for Rachel, Chris Hayes, Steve Kornacki, LO'D, Rev Al, etc etc, Universe.. I don't have tv so I'm sure I'm missing a couple anyway.
thanks Redfairen
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)I always had a tinfoil hat theory that PBS was suing Downton Abbey to soften our opinion towards the 1%. This shows maybe my theroy wasn't so tin foil after all.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 14, 2014, 01:54 AM - Edit history (1)
class thing out of what seemed to be Victorian era nostalgia. A great deal of that was probably unpalatable in the UK's socialist democracy.
I thought later, but not during my youth, that their accent on the ruling class was conditioning. It engrained acceptance for that social structure, by portraying it as antique, somewhat romantic and colorful but for those who were not advantaged it was anything but.
They also made the middle ages, Greek and Roman empires look more natural and free, pure and philosophically. Just ignore the slaves that gave the leisure to come up with all that rot, never mind all of that stuff.
Combine that with some religous groups here and you have a class of people who adore royalty. It's not about equality but a stability built for the 1% at the expense of those whose lives were more chaotic and shorter due to being used for that stability. Accepting it, as a harsh fact of life is made to look bearable in more bucolic settings and all of that.
At least the English working class kept a consciousness that did empower them, despite their disadvantaged status, but now it's gone so far over the edge they've broken that pride.
PBS had a conservative bent with a genteel touch on the weekends that I watched as a kid. It was Buckley, and later McLaughlin and bunch (whatever). They were the pre-Fox news era and made the case that conservatives were intelligent, serious and worldly that we now know tas nothing but know nothing bullies.
And you know that they were always funded by the Koch brothers and foundations that turned out to be less of charity and more of tax evasion devices in the long run. The more public funding that PBS lost, the more independence it lost until now I have no idea what it's about.
I agree with you, that is to say.
Triana
(22,666 posts)I think we can safely say PBS isn't Public anymore. It's owned & controlled - like the rest of the media - by wealthy, private interests.
burrowowl
(17,664 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Just horrible.
alp227
(32,094 posts)The fact that programming can be politically bribed is why PUBLIC BROADCASTING NEEDS PUBLIC FUNDING so that it remains a PUBLIC service. Thanks, Newt Gingrich and the Contract with America!
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.