General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHappyMe
(20,277 posts)I preferred Beckham's commercial.
Scientology had a commercial too.
Auggie
(31,262 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts).
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts).
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)The verb form of 'ignorance', is ignore; nevertheless, many people persist in
looking at 'science'... as if it were a' buffet'... where one can pick and choose!
SCIENCE IS NOT A BUFFET!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)Sole possessors of truth and logic.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)From the comments section of the link in the OP:
17 hours ago
This was originally a Scientology commercial that aired in the Super Bowl last year. I noticed that it was clearly a commercial for atheism and Scientology was trying to steal our shit, so I re-edited it for my channel. Youtube swiftly banned it, so thought I'd try again this year.
It cost 8 million to run and is CLEARLY a commercial for atheism, regardless of who ran it.
Here's the original.
Dusty is quite the representative for atheism. The thief says "Scientology was trying to steal our shit".
snooper2
(30,151 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)why does atheism need or want a commercial?
cordelia
(2,174 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)like a religious thing?
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)It's more of a Youtube commercial.
brooklynite
(95,157 posts)Nice ad, but calling it a "Super Bowl ad" is misleading.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.