Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 05:39 PM Jan 2014

It was Bridget Kelly ("They are the children of Buono voters.")

It was Bridget Kelly

Josh Marshall

There's been a mystery about just who David Wildstein was texting with in those now infamous texts where he says "I feel badly about the kids ... I guess" and the mystery person replies "They are the children of Buono voters." Well, it was Bridget Kelly.

Ryan Lizza I believe incontrovertibly proves that here.



Ryan Lizza @RyanLizza
Follow
Here's the evidence for Bridget Kelly being the person on the other end of these infamous Wildstein texts:
4:00 PM - 11 Jan 2014

14 Retweets 6 favorites

What remains unclear to me is this: just how did a seemingly real time screen capture end up in this document dump? Unless I'm not thinking this through properly (a real possibility) there's no way that image, with battery and connectivity meters showing, comes into being unless you screen cap it at the time or soon after it happens. Since it identifies Kelly as the counter-texter, the phone is clearly Wildstein's and also certainly he made the screen cap. But why?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/bridget-kelly-was-the-texter

WTF? This is bizarre!

Edited title to reflect Kelly's comment.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It was Bridget Kelly ("They are the children of Buono voters.") (Original Post) ProSense Jan 2014 OP
Wildstein madea screenprint of the texts bcuz he wanted to cover his ass! TheDebbieDee Jan 2014 #1
that was my initial thought, too. CTyankee Jan 2014 #13
sorry I didn't see you post warrior1 Jan 2014 #2
Almost like Wildstein was provoking responses to capture for evidence. He might not just be TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #3
It sure looks like Wildstein was covering his rear end early on in this scandal... Spazito Jan 2014 #4
These were likely among ProSense Jan 2014 #6
Yes, no doubt and it seems some were given to send a message to those... Spazito Jan 2014 #7
Or maybe he just want's to retire on Koch brother's $$$$ Walk away Jan 2014 #11
He's already been thrown under the bus and run over multiple times by Christie... Spazito Jan 2014 #12
I hope you are right...I'm counting on many months of everyone... Walk away Jan 2014 #14
With the new investigative committee which can expand their area of investigation... Spazito Jan 2014 #15
For some reason in all the crap I've been reading the last Cha Jan 2014 #5
I'm hoping she will lawyer up, request and receive immunity, and spill all the beans. Tx4obama Jan 2014 #8
That comment isn't going to help her, for sure. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #9
Oops. It wasn't her that said they felt sorry, it was the guy. I retract my previous comment :) Tx4obama Jan 2014 #10
edit from TPM lasttrip Jan 2014 #16
I was just going to add that when I saw your post. pacalo Jan 2014 #17
This is when shoes start dropping. lindysalsagal Jan 2014 #18
 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
1. Wildstein madea screenprint of the texts bcuz he wanted to cover his ass!
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jan 2014

Wildstein is and was savvy enough to know that he needed to have some proof in order to deflect accusations that might start flying once the shit hit the fan. He knew this shit was going to blow up some day.

CTyankee

(63,911 posts)
13. that was my initial thought, too.
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 05:34 PM
Jan 2014

Pretty stupid of Kelly, doncha think?

As my parents used to say, "you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas."

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
3. Almost like Wildstein was provoking responses to capture for evidence. He might not just be
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 05:55 PM
Jan 2014

covering his own ass, but was revealing much more.

Spazito

(50,326 posts)
4. It sure looks like Wildstein was covering his rear end early on in this scandal...
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 06:00 PM
Jan 2014

One of the hosts on MSNBC who knows him said that when he included the document re Christie meeting with someone at the Port Authority shortly before the lane closures he was sending a message that the meeting was connected with the scandal. The host said Wildstein is no friend of Christie in this and the above screen capture in the OP is further proof of that, imo.

Spazito

(50,326 posts)
7. Yes, no doubt and it seems some were given to send a message to those...
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 06:28 PM
Jan 2014

on the investigative committee how 'close' Christie is tied to this. Mr. Wildstein isn't going down alone if he can help it, imo.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
11. Or maybe he just want's to retire on Koch brother's $$$$
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 03:22 PM
Jan 2014

and he's letting them know if they want to save Christie's 2016 hopes they have to pay him off big time.

Spazito

(50,326 posts)
12. He's already been thrown under the bus and run over multiple times by Christie...
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 05:30 PM
Jan 2014

I think he is more likely to want payback for that and, with suitable inducement ie immunity, he will fill in the 'blanks' for the investigative committee. Having worked with and for Christie, he knows full well there is no loyalty, there is only retribution to be found.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
14. I hope you are right...I'm counting on many months of everyone...
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 11:40 PM
Jan 2014

ripping Christie to shreds. But mostly watching the press turn on him!

Spazito

(50,326 posts)
15. With the new investigative committee which can expand their area of investigation...
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 11:58 PM
Jan 2014

beyond what the transportation committee could do it's going to get very interesting, imo. Add to that the 'ad scam' investigation and a possible federal investigation, Christie is in for many, many sleepless nights not just one or two.

Cha

(297,180 posts)
5. For some reason in all the crap I've been reading the last
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 06:07 PM
Jan 2014

few days.. I thought it was her.

But, a "screen cap"?!

lasttrip

(1,013 posts)
16. edit from TPM
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 07:31 PM
Jan 2014

Ed.Note: Two corrections on this post. It is Bridget Kelly. But I got out of order who said what. It's Kelly who says she feels badly about the kids and Wildstein who says they're kids of Buono voters. Second, readers point out that iPhones hold their text history pretty much indefinitely. So Wildstein could have made this capture weeks later, perhaps even to comply with the subpoena that started this whole ball rolling.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
17. I was just going to add that when I saw your post.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 08:26 PM
Jan 2014

Ed.Note: Two corrections on this post. It is Bridget Kelly. But I got out of order who said what. It's Kelly who says she feels badly about the kids and Wildstein who says they're kids of Buono voters. Second, readers point out that iPhones hold their text history pretty much indefinitely. So Wildstein could have made this capture weeks later, perhaps even to comply with the subpoena that started this whole ball rolling.

lindysalsagal

(20,679 posts)
18. This is when shoes start dropping.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 09:36 PM
Jan 2014

Not unlike a college dorm fiasco: Each person will feel like it's time to drop a few bread crumbs for their own personal reasons. Then the puzzle begins to take shape,and outsiders like us add our own interpretations.
This is almost the best part: Unwrapping the presents and wondering which one will blow up.

Of course we all know it was the guvnuh. Who will be his Judas, and why, and when?

I was too young for Watergate, but not this time.....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It was Bridget Kelly (&qu...