General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsR Maddow is getting into a new theory on the why of CC's retribution against Ft Lee, NJ
something about Christie not reappointing Justice John Wallace
.
in 2010
.. Dems were outraged...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:14 PM - Edit history (1)
edit to add- and suspicious-
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:15 PM - Edit history (1)
the leader of the Senate Dems. (edit to add- she voted against two C Christie nominees early on!!)
I didn't get her name, but she is Rachel's next guest.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Ilsa
(61,698 posts)Many thanks for starting this thread. I started another thread to direct to yours.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)when she pointed out that the emails about "traffic" were so brief and cryptic that they prove there was prior planning. GOOD POINT!!
calimary
(81,466 posts)to be applied here. Clearly something had been dreamed up and discussed beforehand. All Bridget Kelly's "time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee" email was for, evidently, was to unleash the hounds. Sounds as though the hounds were already lined up and ready to go, and their handlers were just waiting for the word to be given. REALLY good point when you think about it.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Everything was already in place and all that was needed was the command to implement (this email exchange). Also note that these conversations were conducted on private email accounts (gmail.com & Yahoo.com) rather than office email (.gov). That too speaks volumes.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)of the scenarios involved. Of course they would have organized it earlier but had standing orders of radio/phone silence which were violated by the email. It really makes them look culpable and makes me chuckle.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)the lesson we have desperately tried to warn them about, 'you cannot trust a Right Winger like Cristie whose RECORD on issues SHOULD have been enough to stop any Democrat, let alone over fifty of them, from even THINKING of endorsing them.
He manipulated them to an embarrasssing degree and watching it as it happened was cringe inducing to democrats who tried to stop the love fest of Cristie and were told to stfu.
Bi-partisanship! Compromise! I hope this ends any fantasy that some democrats appeared to have that they could EVER trust a right winger like Cristie. He used them, all those Dems who rushed to endorse him, and then, as anyone with a brain cell functioning knew he would, he stabbed in the back. It is painful to watch OUR party continuing to 'trust' these people. Seriously painful.
House of Roberts
(5,182 posts)Those endorsements were coerced, extorted via the threat of other forms of political payback.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)if you are correct, how depressing that our party is so vulnerable to threats when the other party doesn't appear to worry about them.
I'm not seeing how 'they were afraid not to' helps the image Democrats. On the contrary. I know there was the claim that Dems were fearful of retaliation. if anything, THAT ALONE should have generated so much ANGER at Cristie that Dems should have united to EXPOSE him. I mean I expected dirty tricks from Cristie too. So what? Are we as a part so weak that rather than STAND UP against this kind of bullying, we cave and endorse the very people even Politicians are afraid of?
Sorry, but that is no excuse for the overwhelming number of heartfelt endorsements Cristie received from Democrats. I was shameful frankly and many of us said so at the time.
But ONE Democrat refused to be intimidates, and because of his refusal to be intimidated, the whole phony bi-partisan BS has been exposed. Demonstrating that standing UP to bullies is the RIGHT thing to do.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)malaise
(269,157 posts)His blow up the day before when he withdrew the ReTHUG judge (one of his staff's wife) because the Senate Dems were going to make them pay for Wallace.
This is too good.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)They were punishing the district represented by Weinberg, the Senate Dem Leader!
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Ilsa
(61,698 posts)This is the trail to shift out, to follow, not the Mayor's endorsement.
GreatCaesarsGhost
(8,585 posts)Christie must have given the go ahead. He was pissed the day before.
avebury
(10,952 posts)Spazito
(50,453 posts)It makes much more sense than the retaliation toward the Mayor, that one had me puzzled, such a major action against someone who wasn't even asked to endorse Christie.
stg81
(351 posts)Spazito
(50,453 posts)that was part of what puzzled me about the reason being put forth re retaliation toward this particular Mayor. I figured there had to be something more, something more substantive than a lack of endorsement being the cause of the major action taken by Christie/his inner circle.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)Or whomever about this theory. She nailed it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)be appointed next week. That will be interesting!!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)prove there was prior planning/ discussion on the specific actions that were to be taken. Very good point!!
and says she did vote against two of Christie's judicial nominees early on
..
ProSense
(116,464 posts)A couple of Democratic members of the New Jersey state legislature were not entirely satisfied with Gov. Chris Christie's claims Thursday at a press conference that he did not know that members of his staff ordered lane closures on the George Washington Bridge last year.
"This is beyond the pale," Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg (D) told the Newark Star-Ledger. "He has not asked a question in four months? He suddenly found out this was a big deal? Where was he four months ago?"
Assemblyman John Wisniewski (D), who led the assembly's investigation into the lane closures, was skeptical that members of Christie's staff came up with the plan to cause traffic issues in Fort Lee all by themselves.
" T)his in an administration that keeps a tight rein," he told the Star-Ledger. "It strains credibility that Bridget Kelly would concoct this plan all by herself."
- more -
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/new-jersey-democrats-not-satisfied-christie-answers
Cha
(297,655 posts)Except morning joe?
Love this.. Assemblyman John Wisniewski (D)
thanks ProSense
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)-snip-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/37th_Legislative_District_%28New_Jersey%29
-snip-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loretta_Weinberg
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)"had sincere productive and candid conversation"
Hmmm.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)saying we hear, it's about you?" No one at PA is responding for days then suspected it could be about me"
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and that Ft Lee is too liberal and too successful that Repugs liked slapping them down..
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Marshal Biggs: This is hinky, this guy's a college graduate, he went to medical school, he's not gonna come through all the security, go to the county lockup, to find someone his one people say does not exist. Hinky.
Deputy Marshal Samuel Gerard: Well, what does that mean Biggs, 'hinky'?
Marshal Biggs: I don't know. Strange.
Marshal Henry: Weird.
Deputy Marshal Samuel Gerard: Well, why don't you say strange or weird? I mean hinky, that has no meaning.
Marshal Biggs: Well, we say hinky.
Deputy Marshal Samuel Gerard: I don't want you guys using words around me that have no meaning. I'm taking the stairs and walking.
bench scientist
(1,107 posts)ChangeUp106
(549 posts)So was it about both? I'll have to watch the replay of her show later. What time is it? 11 or midnight?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)when they ran through a list of other communities w/ Dem Mayoral endorsements, they did get a lot of northern towns in surrounding areas. I was kind of surprised to see that.
ChangeUp106
(549 posts)from what I hear.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)as he did across the state. he was trying to "run up the clock" and admitted it.
Spazito
(50,453 posts)and not in the context of him specifically being the reason for the retaliation. When one puts Rachel's theory in play, the mention of the Mayor gives me a different take on why he is mentioned.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Gothmog
(145,554 posts)This theory makes sense
ffr
(22,671 posts)louslobbs
(3,238 posts)Lou
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)April 14, 2011
Chris Christie urges reporters to 'take the bat' to 76-year-old widow (Weinberg)
Here: http://crooksandliars.com/david/chris-christie-urges-reporters-take-bat-76-y
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Thanks!
renate
(13,776 posts)How has he gotten away with talking like that for so long? It's HORRIFYING. He doesn't just sound like a bully, he sounds dangerous. It'd be one thing to be offended (although wasn't she entitled to her pension as well as to her paycheck as a legislator? I mean, why shouldn't she be?) but to have violent thoughts...
freshwest
(53,661 posts)about Obama like he was a dog and then was not treated the same way in return. CC runs the gamut of biting and bulllying everyone he can, then goes with his tail between his legs.
This is who he truly is. He recieved help for his people from a man with a real belief in public service. But CC serves no one but his masters and self. The difference in the character of the two men is clear as glass.
The Republicans should be ashamed to have offered him a place in their party, but they are as bad as he is.
valerief
(53,235 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Cha
(297,655 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Chris Hayes is adorable. In his adoration.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)I recorded it for later to listen closer.
Cha
(297,655 posts)spanone
(135,873 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)Rilgin
(787 posts)This theory makes a lot more sense than retaliation against the mayor of Ft. Lee. Her new theory ands some other facts put out by the mayor of FT. Lee also somewhat explains why the GW Bridge was used. Ft. Lee just redeveloped including 2 new towers. Loss of bridge lanes would seriously impact Ft. Lee and this redevelopment. That was the threat and causing traffic problems was just making the threat clear.
What the Christie administration might have planned was shutting the lanes down for a few days, postulating they could design a traffic study to recommend permanent removal. After causing the traffic, they the pressure the democrats with a threat that you could make it permanent. In other words after the fact you go to the representative from Bergen County (Loretta Weinberg) who leads the Senate Democrats to say how do you like the first taste of what we can do.
The actual problem with understanding any of the political motivation theories in connection with the mayor is that the mayor does not say he was he was threatened or coerced for his endorsement and does not know any other reason he could be targeted. The mayor even didn't remember being approached for the endorsement.
However, politics with the bridge could make sense if directed at he Senate Democratic leader because you could damage her district a little first, then make it clear that it will continue or that you might try to yank lanes from her district in the future if she doesn't cooperate with what you want. This threat of traffic works great in connection with the major development work in those New Jersey districts.
The actual approach to the Senate Democratic leader was never made because the local traffic reporters started to investigate and the scandal began. At that point it would have been clear that the last thing you would want to do is threaten the democratic leader and connect the dots for everyone as to the motive for the shutdown of the lanes.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Cha
(297,655 posts)now I can go right to this link.
Deja Vu
concreteblue
(626 posts)I have been trying to watch the Maddow show for an hour...It says "loading video" and the peacock tail spins, but no vid....I have refreshed the page several times.....D.O.S. by CC fans?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Eight minute excerpt here: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/maddow-nj-bridge-scandal-was-political-revenge-but-maybe-not-for-the-reason-you-think%E2%80%A6/
Sorry to hear that the MSNBC isn't working for you (the videos at MSNBC.com are still working for me).
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)trying to get the bare bones of it. I appreciate you fleshing it out for us!
bananas
(27,509 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)dansolo
(5,376 posts)After watching Rachel's show last night, I believe she is really on to something. But I don't think she went far enough. Cristie's explanation for pulling her renomination was allegedly to protect her good name. But I wonder if his real concern was that their questioning of her could involve dealings with her husband, and ultimately Christie's office. Who is her husband, and what is his role in the Christie administration?
ananda
(28,876 posts)I'm sure Christie has a lot more to hide.
Delphinus
(11,840 posts)has a lot more to hide - and in some ways I'm grateful one dear friend of mine didn't win because I wonder how much of her soul she would have had to sell.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)unc70
(6,119 posts)I think they feared the Dems would start digging with subpeonas into issues involving the judge's husband, and thus into the Governor's office.
Dorian Gray
(13,499 posts)I have been a little ignorant about Chris Christie, especially since I grew up in NJ. Since I live in NYC now, I don't pay close attention to NJ politics anymore. Of course, I've been aware of him, but I've been a little ignorant of the ins and outs. But this story is horrible. The corruption in NJ politics is so frustrating, and I feel for all my family and friends who still live there. Frustrating to say the least.
hatrack
(59,592 posts)nt
Puglover
(16,380 posts)reportage took my breath away. She is an absolute treasure.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Excellent work from Team Maddow.
Please proceed
(59 posts)to punish and/or reward those that either supported or not supported Christy. Both theories, the pay back to the Mayor of Fort Lee and The payback for the Supreme Court slight, both indicate the Christy administrations zeal to teach lessons to those within his State. Couldn't it be possible that Federal assets other than the GWB, such as Federal monies, could have been misused by this administration for political purposes?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)(on Maddow) a huge redevelopment deal going on there (a generally blue area) that their might be some - I think he used the word "jealously" over. I immediately thought, they didn't get the cut they wanted out of that gold mine.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You KNOW Christie is screwed because on every news site, you don't see them rebutting the accusations against him. It's all "but...but...but...Obama!! Benghazi!!"
They know he's done, but they don't want him to take the GOP down with him, so that's all they have to rally the troops. It's rather hilarious.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)retribution against Ft. Lee. And I am glad the CT posse decided to let this go. It's a good example that not all CT needs to be trashed.
Bravo for Ms. Maddow and thanks for posting.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)They apparently hated Weinberg, but had no love for the mayor either. (if it was a more bipartisan area they might have held back?) And trying to make it look like this was local politicians (all Dems) fault, I think it was just an attempt to ruin Dems in general there. Other fairly prosperous areas to the west of Ft Lee have gotten redder, and I think they were hoping they could make a dent there too. Christie did do much better there than his first time. I have to wonder how many voters believed this was the fault of local government in November and got disgusted. God know the Replicans get over by trashing services and blaming "big gov" all the time.