General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT goes balls out after young Sandidnista sympatizer de Blasio. Lhota says he has no soul
The scruffy young man who arrived in Nicaragua in 1988 stood out.
Bill de Blasio, then 26, went to Nicaragua to help distribute food and medicine in the middle of a war between left and right. But he returned with something else entirely: a vision of the possibilities of an unfettered leftist government.
As he seeks to become the next mayor of New York City, Mr. de Blasio, the citys public advocate, has spoken only occasionally about his time as a fresh-faced idealist who opposed foreign wars, missile defense systems and apartheid in the late 1980s and early 1990s. References to his early activism have been omitted from his campaign Web site.
But a review of hundreds of pages of records and more than two dozen interviews suggest his time as a young activist was more influential in shaping his ideology than previously known, and far more political than typical humanitarian work.
Mr. de Blasio, who studied Latin American politics at Columbia and was conversational in Spanish, grew to be an admirer of Nicaraguas ruling Sandinista party, thrusting himself into one of the most polarizing issues in American politics at the time. The Reagan administration denounced the Sandinistas as tyrannical and Communist, while their liberal backers argued that after years of dictatorship, they were building a free society with broad access to education, land and health care.
<snip>
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/23/nyregion/a-mayoral-hopeful-now-de-blasio-was-once-a-young-leftist.html?ref=nyregion&pagewanted=all&_r=0
Joe Lhota Suggests Bill de Blasio Has No Soul
Republican mayoral candidate Joe Lhota pounced on his rival Bill de Blasio today, suggesting his opponent had no soul during an endorsement event with Staten Island Borough President Jim Molinaro.
Youre either for it or against it, said Mr. Lhota in response to a question about comments made earlier today by Mr. de Blasio regarding a court-appointed monitor for the police department.
In a radio interview this morning, Mr. de Blasio said he believed the monitorwhich was ordered as part of Judge Shira Sheindlins stop-and-frisk rulingwas a temporary reality, arguing that once the city had a new police commissioner and new local oversight in place, the monitor would no longer be necessary. But Mr. Lhota slammed the comments as pure hypocrisy, given Mr. de Blasios previous push for added oversight.
Youre gonna flip-flop like that all in one conversation, it talks about someone who has no soul, Mr. Lhota charged.
<snip>
http://politicker.com/2013/09/joe-lhota-suggests-bill-de-blasio-has-no-soul/
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)In 1983, fresh out of New York University, he petitioned a Manhattan judge to formally change his name to Warren de Blasio-Wilhelm, according to legal records.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/election/de-blasio-names-de-blasio-article-1.1463591
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)rurallib
(62,411 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Get police working right and there won't be a need for a judicial monitor.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)A spokesman for Joe Lhota tells the New York Post Friday the candidate doesn't think shutting down subway service for lost cats is appropriate. But he said Lhota believes it wouldn't be the mayor's decision in any case.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Lawlbringer
(550 posts)Hardly close.
Both guys are hardcore windbags, moreso than the average pol. What's ironic is that John Catsimatidis (who ran against Lhota in the Republican Primaries) is the candidate for the Liberal party. There are no strong/visible third party contenders in this year's race, so it's gonna be a huge mess.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)reading about the ties that de Blasio has with the Clinton's leaves much to speculate. Hopefully he'll be at least a small improvement of the present aristocrat.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)but I guess that's just me.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)see as a threat to their order