General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you stand with the leader of the Democratic Party?
Or do you stand with Rand Paul?
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)and I can walk over Obama and Paul if I need to, because standing with does not mean I let them walk over me.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)At this point, I don't stand with either of them.
Ohio Joe
(21,756 posts)I love your wisdom Peggy
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)I'm just so damned pissed off these days!
Skittles
(153,160 posts)YO GIRL!!!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)an ass-kicking.
standard variety nitwittery
Aerows
(39,961 posts)A trio of foolishness, those "Wit" brothers.
Warpy
(111,257 posts)I'm especially pissed at all the false choices around here: either you want to turn Syria into a glass covered parking lot or you're a Randbot.
It's sickening.
It's also not working.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)or agin' us!
I thought we did away with that saying after Iraq.
RC
(25,592 posts)Except for the singers praising this, I don't see a lot of difference between this and the run up to Iraq.
Warpy
(111,257 posts)I tell people what's really going on and they don't seem to hear a world of it.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)tsuki
(11,994 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)destroy because that is the last option left, or realize that destruction and killing are both an evil unto themself.
I see destruction with more to come in this situation.
leftstreet
(36,108 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)& their advisers, and they use the same language & tactics as the worst RW zealots - like Sen. Paul. These people are not our friends.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)And as for Rand Paul? Fuck him.
I do not understand what the motivation is for the Administration. War with Syria is wrong.
prairierose
(2,145 posts)this is exactly what I think too. And I'm with you, I'm so pissed off about all of this I could scream or
But, mostly, I wanted to say thanks for saying what I was thinking and feeling.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)Now I need to step away from the computer.....
Aerows
(39,961 posts)it's stacking horseshit on a foundation of horseshit and trying to tell people they had better see it as sculpture and not notice the smell or they aren't loyal to the party.
Guess what? Ultimately, I am loyal to my country, and the party can go fuck itself if it doesn't have the USA's best interests at heart, which getting mixed up in Syria is most definitely not in our best interests.
Trailrider1951
(3,414 posts)times a million. Me, too, sweet heart
Aerows
(39,961 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)a bad freaking idea. I'm in that crowd, and could care less if Kerry and Obama don't join me there. It's a stupid idea for a number of reasons and that is why the American people don't want to get involved, either.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)which is a pile of shit, isn't impugning the honor of anyone. It impugns common sense why we would even contemplate getting involved in the first place.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)but he could leave office with a thoroughly soured base, and a discredited Democratic Party.
IMO, in the very near future there will be great demand for economic security, peace and leadership, and the Party as constituted is incapable of providing any of this.
Style is admirable, but increasingly short-lived -- even an encumbrance -- in these times.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)has gone corpoate, and WILL follow the doctrines and dictates of the national security state out of fear of it and ignorance of a better way.
We have one party which is aggressively -- and successfully -- pursuing an authoritarian state, and the other which is a flimsy bureaucracy-in-waiting, hoping the "other side" fucks up.
QC
(26,371 posts)You just **HAVE** to! {sob}
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and taking on a whole new Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan has more than a few people drawing a red line, and they have to step over it to get to the Pepto Bismal.
I'd have to have a historical lobotomy to support actions in Syria.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I don't care if Pol Pot is shrieking from his grave against intervention, I'd still be against intervention because it is a bad damned idea.
Because, baldly, no pun intended, I am staunchly against getting involved in this quagmire.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Ron Paul is irrelevant.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)I share your view and think you expressed it well.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)As if you absolutely MUST fall in line with one or the other.
At this point, Dylan's admonition "Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters" is my mantra.
blazeKing
(329 posts)I don't stand with warmongers or bigots.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)wandy
(3,539 posts)Funny, heard that one before.
Same answer.
Fuck You
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)bottles, cans, war propaganda...
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)share whatever fate a DU Jury might deliver to you with you. In solidarity!
wandy
(3,539 posts)Their are two things I don't ever want to hear again.
"You are either with us or against us"
"Watch what you say. Watch what you do."
Not anywhere, not from anyone.
The answer stands.
Although I support President Obama most of the time , that does not mean that my support is conscripted on every issue.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Your simplistic jingoism is as repulsive as was reagan's.
Autumn
(45,083 posts)or Rand Paul. If that's all you got, you got nothing. Oh and Fuck Rand Paul and the idiot who spawned him.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Or did he stand with Bernie Sanders?
quinnox
(20,600 posts)starts at 1:06 seconds.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)into a war unilaterally."
Marr
(20,317 posts)ellenrr
(3,864 posts)You stand ag. unilateral war,
and
you stand with Obama
BUT Obama is pursuing unilateral war.
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)I think he might be a different guy from President Obama.
Marr
(20,317 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)It's manipulative agit-prop.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)I stand with lamp!
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,501 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)I'll be having my Dutch apple a la mode.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)'Cause I kinda miss agreeing with you about stuff and I'm starting to think that's all you and i can shake hands on
Here's an answer; I don't stand with John McCain, Lindsey Graham, AEI, AIPAC, or any of the other neocon shitwhip warmonger facades pumping for this war.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)nice use of the language. I'm so borrowing "shitwhip" sometime
Skittles
(153,160 posts)yeah, it is that simple
sendero
(28,552 posts)... but there are a lot of simple people on this forum, a lot more than there used to be.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)20. Oh well that does it then.
If Rand Paul is against it I am for it...and if he were for it I would be against it....because I am just that petty and stupid, and caught up in the cult of personalities.
Following the cult leader is the only morality I need...he can tell us what is right and wrong and all we have to do is believe in him.
I don't know if this is necessary but...
Response to baldguy (Original post)
MFrohike This message was self-deleted by its author.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)commented on Syria?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)FreeState
(10,572 posts)Is this a GOP push poll?
dawg
(10,624 posts)On this one issue. On most other issues I would stand with the President.
But I don't follow blindly.
And I don't put "party" above what I believe to be right.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Where have I heard that before?
G_j
(40,367 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)his shitstain of a son too!
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)Why is it that once a week we get someone who decides it's time for a Loyalty Test? Why can't we stand with other Democrats? Democrats like Alan Grayson who is without a doubt a Democrat? Why must someone always come here and insist that any Democrats must line up behind someone who is doing something we don't like? Are we next going to be called upon to line up behind Filner of San Diego? Are all good Democrats going to have to line up and support Anthony Weiner?
I stand with Alan Grayson, Democratic Congressman of Florida. I stand with Hank Johnson, Democratic Congressman from Georgia. Both of who have spoken out against this action in Syria. I may stand with Elizabeth Warren, and I may stand with others, if they stand with principles and ideals I stand with.
markpkessinger
(8,396 posts). . . then one could just as easily pose this question to you:
Do you stand with the leader of the Democratic Party because you support, in principle, war in Syria, permanent tax cuts for the wealthy, a switch to a chained-CPI basis for calculating Social Security benefit increases, the killing of innocents with the use of drones, the assassination of a 16-year-old American kid because of the actions of his terrorist father with no due process whatsoever, an unprecedented war on whistleblowers, etc., or do you support him merely because he is the Democratic Party?
There, see how easy it is to play this sophomoric game of logical fallacies?
warrant46
(2,205 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)away from his own OP, given the paucity of his responses herein. (Think I've only seen one response.)
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)False dichotomy.
No one speaks for me.
I am not in lock-step with anyone.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that thinks intervening in Syria (read: go to war) is a bad idea. I don't give a shit if Satan came on the House floor and voted no. I'd vote with Satan.
Warpy
(111,257 posts)My stand is issue based, not hero worship based.
And this thinly veiled post calling the vast majority here at DU Randbots has been duly noted.
markpkessinger
(8,396 posts)Well said!
Marr
(20,317 posts)Nothing but loyalty to the boss. Ultimately, that's their only real motivation.
But don't say "authoritarian", because that's just so unfair.
Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)I certainly do not stand with that nut Rand Paul or his anti freedom allies on the far flung left.
I stand with Obama and the MODERATE Republicans who know he is Right to fight for freedom.
ocpagu
(1,954 posts)LMAO...
So moderate is a new word for war criminal?
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Post removed
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)[img][/img]
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I don't stand with any politician. I take my stand on issues, not parties or personalities or so-called leaders.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)And anyone else who says fuck OFF to the notion of intervening in Syria.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and CaliforniaPeggy, my dear cherokeeprogressive, and don't give a damn who knows it!
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Today I heard Nancy Pelosi quote her five year old grandson... I almost fell out of my truck. If you haven't heard it you HAVE to look it up. What she claims a five year old says about Syria is so beyond the pale it's gotta be heard to be believed. A five year old.
We are truly living in interesting times. There is even a DUer who claims the ONLY injury possible to ANY American if we attack Syria is a paper cut to be suffered filling out "after-action reports". Forget that Incirlik Air Base in Turkey is within range of hundreds of Syrian missiles.
Hey... tomorrow my kid starts testosterone therapy in advance of gender reassignment.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I remember us chatting about this and that you have struggled with doing the best you can as being supportive, and I'd say you are a pretty damn incredible parent.
I wish you both the very best .
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and your family, my friend
gate of the sun
(1,658 posts)and that means not attacking Syria. I haven't posted on here in years, only lurking but THIS is worth saying. I don't stand for the head of the Democratic party nor Rand Paul and I resent that kind of pigeon holing the situation.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Trailrider1951
(3,414 posts)I haven't seen one in ages.......
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)It's not always one or the other, you know.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)amazingly I sometimes put them on too, and what's more amazing is I make that decision totally independent of his decisions!
The either /or fallacy is the dumbest one in the logic book. Is that all you got?
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)What is this, some kind of loyalty oath? Should we follow like good little sheep to our own slaughter? Are you serious?
We have a president that many of us worked very hard to get elected. FACT. That president has chosen to allow the NSA to spy on us wholesale. FACT. That president has lied on national television about the spying. FACT. That president has pardoned Bush and his cronies for war crimes. FACT. That president is working on a secret pact, TPP, which will effectively hand this country over to the corporations.
FACT. That president is now poised to start a THIRD war when the people at home, the ones who pay for the war, cannot afford to feed or house themselves.
Paul doesn't have a thing to do with it. Are you ready to trust this president anymore, at this point?
I'm not.
David__77
(23,396 posts)...
MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)We lost 3,000 on 9/11 and another 5,000 troops before Obama took office. And now we are just going to switch sides and fight FOR Al Queda?
I don't even know what to fucking think anymore. It's mind boggling.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)My own son has just got back from that Afghan cluster fuck---
I did too little to stop that shit thanks to Roberts and his robed cabal
After my Viet Nam and my fathers WW2 and Korea, and my grandfathers WW 1 We are taking the next one OFF
David__77
(23,396 posts)...
warrant46
(2,205 posts)This upcoming proposed adventure is an exercise in madness.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Obama isn't Bush Jr, Jr - no matter how much the haters want to believe it.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)"Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." Mark Twain
Until you drop the logical fallacies, I'm done with you.
markpkessinger
(8,396 posts). . . I think the burden is on those who are making the case for intervention in Syria to convincingly make the case for how and why it is not like those other misadventures, What with the President now hinting at this as being part of a "broader strategy" for regime change in Syria, that case gets harder and harder to make.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Abe,Teddy, and Ike were good men and good presidents who loved and protected our country. Anybody you could be speaking of at present time, on either side of the aisle, works for lobbyists..........Period.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I hope you are enjoying your troll thread.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I hope to goodness it *IS* a troll.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I can't express it any other way.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)That's my two cents. Go buy a clue.
frylock
(34,825 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Dishonest framing is dishonest.
0rganism
(23,953 posts)Or is it Hobson's Choice?
Quite a dilemma you've got going there.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)and I don't need their opinions to make up my mind.
A very childish question to ask on a serious matter.
peace13
(11,076 posts)I can stand with that!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)I stand with a half dozen folks that post here on DU that articulate precisely what would immediately help our nation.
davekriss
(4,616 posts)Shame on you!
Courtesy Flush
(4,558 posts)I stand with Obama... the 2008 Obama, not the 2013 Obama.
So many to choose from.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)It would suck to lack such critical thinking skills. It seems he has been sentenced to live in a this or that, black or white world.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)what the fuck is with this obsession with Rand Paul? Does saying RAND PAUL somehow make your argument right? Rand Paul is fucking loser and has nothing to do with how I feel about Syria.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)and head in your ass all at once
good show!
frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)and their sycophants.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)The bar is just too damned high for me to compete.
Regards,
Third-Way Manny
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Oakenshield
(614 posts)This paulbot accusation garbage is really getting old.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I am and have always been a pacifist. I didn't stand with Lyndon Johnson in 1967 either.
markiv
(1,489 posts)with a sprinkle of 'fear of bogyman' tossed in
nice
on point
(2,506 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Al-Qaeda-linked Syria rebels target Christian village
U.S. Senate panel votes to give Obama authority to use military force against Syria
Al-Qaeda-linked rebels have launched an assault on a regime-held Christian village in the densely populated west of Syria and new clashes erupted near the capital, Damascus part of a brutal battle of attrition each side believes it can win despite more than two years of deadlock.
As the world focused on possible U.S. military action against Syria, rebels commandeered a mountaintop hotel in the village of Maaloula and shelled the community below Wednesday, said a nun, speaking by phone from a convent in the village. She spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/09/05/wrd-syria-us-rebel-attack.html
eridani
(51,907 posts)soundsgreat
(125 posts)Are you with us - or the terrorists?
a la izquierda
(11,794 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Its leaders are transitory.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)grattsl
(63 posts)I am a registered Democrat, and MOST of the time I stand with the Democratic Party, but not on EVERY issue. To support a party without thought would seem very Republican to me. Neither party will always be right, or always be wrong. Right now, our Democratic President is racing down the WRONG path. I do hope he changes course.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)I stand with Nobody, because Nobody deserves to have that much power!
And Nobody listens to my concerns!
And Nobody knows the trouble I've seen!
And Nobody can make an apple pie like good ol' Mom!
Vote for Nobody!
(Old Wavy Gravy joke...)
David Krout
(423 posts)Your question should be more specific. Are you attempting to paint those who agree with Rand Paul's view that war is Syria is bad as Rand Paul lovers in general terms?
Deep13
(39,154 posts)I stand with humanity.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)OccupyManny
(60 posts)He's a fantastic leader and a role model for children. I'm disappointed he didn't help much with our own " Arab Spring" at Occupy but I understand why. I hope Elizabeth Warren, my hero supports him.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)post intended to show the ridiculousness of the pro-Obama-at-all-costs position?
Marr
(20,317 posts)the Bushbots of yesterday. Actually, exactly like the Bushbots of yesterday.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)to post McCarthyesque crap like this. And you are right, it is exactly what we heard from Freepers in the Shrub years.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)I wish I had never voted at all in the last two elections. And I want my campaign contributions back. There, how's that?
djean111
(14,255 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)If this country can't afford social security, healthcare for all, food for its hungry children, living wage jobs for its workers, safe roads and bridges, etc, it sure as hell can't afford trillion dollar reckless military adventures in the ME!
I mean its worked so well in the past, right?
And hey WW3 would really bring in the bucks for the MIC eh?
I don't think one poor American kid caught up in the economic draft should have to die to enrich even further the damned oil companies and the bloody MIC!
I guess that makes me a bad democrat/progressive? WTFever LOL!
Oh and that racist prick Rand Paul can go piss up a rope!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Those other guys can go fuck themselves.
cali
(114,904 posts)etc, etc.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)that the U.S. should unilaterally bomb Syria. duh.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)but won't allow the President to take any action if they are used. Instead, you attack him if he even dares suggests any action at all.
The worst thing we can do about homicidal bullies like Assad is to ignore them & allow their atrocities to go unchallenged. Duh.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Bake
(21,977 posts)In blood, please.
What a bullshit OP. You're either fer us or agin us ...
Bake
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)Or do you stand with Rand Paul?
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)And for the record, I do NOT support Obama or any other Democrat who supports this warmongering bullshit. And fuck Rand Paul.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Jesus Christ on a Cracker.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)n/t
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)MindPilot
(12,693 posts)If it's war they're planning, I'm sitting this one out.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)I stand with Rand.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)think they are opposing him on this in their own, the country's, and ultimately his administration's best interests.
Just maybe, you know?
If we were to attack Syria, and it were to go sour, this administration would be deeply and forever tarnished.
People don't oppose the president for his moral position in this. They are looking at this pragmatically. There is widespread agreement that the use of chemical weapons is a war crime.
There are three basic parts of any tenable theory of just war:
1) The cause must be just,
2) Success must be obtainable, and by "success" it is meant that the cause of the war will be removed.
3) If you make war, you must wage it in such a way that you believe that you will succeed and that you will remove the cause.
Anybody who stops and thinks about the situation has to realize that 2 and 3 are the problems here, and would probably commit us to sending troops in if we are serious.
The reality of this thing is that since the military strategists don't think we can take out the chemical weapons without putting a lot of troops in this country, if we start a limited bombing campaign we may well be making this worse. If we weaken Assad and the rebellion gains, he may use them anyway. After all, he and his regime are going to be slaughtered if they lose. They're desperate.
If we go in and grab them, that removes one problem if we get them all (doubtful).
If we don't go in and the rebels win, then some highly unsavory people are going to get this stuff and who knows where it ends up?
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)I don't need a pol to think for me. In fact, it is supposed to be the other way around and these people are supposed to stand with us.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)it's been more effective than rogaine.
maybe you should try it as opposed to seeking a scalping like you recieved here