Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 05:26 PM Jul 2013

Jim Cramer of CNBC insists that Elizabeth Warren takedown ‘had NO impact’

Jim Cramer of CNBC insists that Elizabeth Warren takedown ‘had NO impact’

Jim Cramer of financial news network CNBC, the man who famously urged investors to buy Bear Stearns stock a week before the company collapsed, has set his sights on Sen. Elizabeth Warren. According to Talking Points Memo, Cramer took to Twitter Wednesday and insisted that Warren’s appearance on the network last week “had NO impact” on people’s perception of the Glass-Steagall Act or Warren’s quest (aided by Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain) to break up the big banks before they can crash the economy again.

On “Squawk Box,” Warren appeared to effortlessly bat aside the two anchors’ pro-bank talking points, saying that once Glass-Steagall was implemented in the 1930s, the U.S. had a long period — 50 years — of relative financial stability. For each point the anchors brought up, Warren was ready with a calm, reasoned reply. In the words of Esquire blogger Charles Pierce, “The next thing they knew, they were sprawled on the canvas, and somebody was waving ammonia capsules under their noses, and Mills Lane [The famous boxing announcer and referee-Ed.] was standing above them, waving his arms.”

Naturally, this didn’t sit well with Cramer, who, on Wednesday, tweeted:

There is some weird strain of thought that CNBC got beaten by Senator Warren. I like the senator but she had NO impact. Sorry..
— Jim Cramer (@jimcramer) July 17, 2013


Cramer’s financial advice to viewers over time has been so bad — and his camera presence so unremittingly manic and shrill — that “The Daily Show” dedicated an entire segment to his and the network’s terrible track record in 2009. Then, the show did another segment a week later, in which “Daily Show” host Jon Stewart ripped Cramer in particular for giving people terrible financial advice that could end up bankrupting them.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/17/jim-cramer-of-cnbc-insists-that-elizabeth-warren-takedown-had-no-impact/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jim Cramer of CNBC insists that Elizabeth Warren takedown ‘had NO impact’ (Original Post) ErikJ Jul 2013 OP
Perhaps he should go fuck himself? onehandle Jul 2013 #1
I look at Cramer as a farcical Leninist who blows smoke up the asses of those indepat Jul 2013 #2
he obviously didnt see the tape leftyohiolib Jul 2013 #3
k&r for Elizabeth Warren. n/t Laelth Jul 2013 #4
I don't like it but he's telling the truth ceonupe Jul 2013 #5

indepat

(20,899 posts)
2. I look at Cramer as a farcical Leninist who blows smoke up the asses of those
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 05:43 PM
Jul 2013

willing to watch him.

 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
5. I don't like it but he's telling the truth
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 05:53 PM
Jul 2013

The horse left the barn long ago and no matter how much I like what some of E. warren presents I'm not to naive to think its really possible on the next 50 years short of a complete economic collapse the forces a rethinking of our bank and investing systems

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jim Cramer of CNBC insist...