Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJim Cramer of CNBC insists that Elizabeth Warren takedown ‘had NO impact’
Jim Cramer of CNBC insists that Elizabeth Warren takedown had NO impactJim Cramer of financial news network CNBC, the man who famously urged investors to buy Bear Stearns stock a week before the company collapsed, has set his sights on Sen. Elizabeth Warren. According to Talking Points Memo, Cramer took to Twitter Wednesday and insisted that Warrens appearance on the network last week had NO impact on peoples perception of the Glass-Steagall Act or Warrens quest (aided by Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain) to break up the big banks before they can crash the economy again.
On Squawk Box, Warren appeared to effortlessly bat aside the two anchors pro-bank talking points, saying that once Glass-Steagall was implemented in the 1930s, the U.S. had a long period 50 years of relative financial stability. For each point the anchors brought up, Warren was ready with a calm, reasoned reply. In the words of Esquire blogger Charles Pierce, The next thing they knew, they were sprawled on the canvas, and somebody was waving ammonia capsules under their noses, and Mills Lane [The famous boxing announcer and referee-Ed.] was standing above them, waving his arms.
Naturally, this didnt sit well with Cramer, who, on Wednesday, tweeted:
There is some weird strain of thought that CNBC got beaten by Senator Warren. I like the senator but she had NO impact. Sorry..
Jim Cramer (@jimcramer) July 17, 2013
Cramers financial advice to viewers over time has been so bad and his camera presence so unremittingly manic and shrill that The Daily Show dedicated an entire segment to his and the networks terrible track record in 2009. Then, the show did another segment a week later, in which Daily Show host Jon Stewart ripped Cramer in particular for giving people terrible financial advice that could end up bankrupting them.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/17/jim-cramer-of-cnbc-insists-that-elizabeth-warren-takedown-had-no-impact/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 937 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jim Cramer of CNBC insists that Elizabeth Warren takedown ‘had NO impact’ (Original Post)
ErikJ
Jul 2013
OP
onehandle
(51,122 posts)1. Perhaps he should go fuck himself?
Perhaps?
indepat
(20,899 posts)2. I look at Cramer as a farcical Leninist who blows smoke up the asses of those
willing to watch him.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)3. he obviously didnt see the tape
Laelth
(32,017 posts)4. k&r for Elizabeth Warren. n/t
-Laelth
ceonupe
(597 posts)5. I don't like it but he's telling the truth
The horse left the barn long ago and no matter how much I like what some of E. warren presents I'm not to naive to think its really possible on the next 50 years short of a complete economic collapse the forces a rethinking of our bank and investing systems