Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 11:10 AM Jul 2013

Quebec Disaster Spurs Rail-Versus-Pipelines Debate on Oil

By Jeremy van Loon and Gerrit De Vynck - Jul 8, 2013

A train disaster that killed five people in Quebec promises to touch off debate over the safety of shipping crude oil by rail or pipelines such as TransCanada Corp. (TRP)’s Keystone XL.

--clip
“People think rail is costless until something like this happens,” said John Stephenson, fund manager with First Asset Investment Management Inc., said from Toronto, where he helps manage C$2.70 billion ($2.65 billion). “This is another data point that shows how much costlier and riskier rail is compared to pipelines and will probably move Canada closer to having an energy strategy.”

The July 6 accident forced the evacuation of 2,000 near the town of Lac-Megantic as Montreal, Maine & Atlantic moved oil to Irving Oil Corp.’s Saint John refinery in New Brunswick. The cargo was part of Canadian producers’ growing use of rail amid tight pipeline capacity.

“It’s been a real shame that a lot of the public and especially the activists have pushed the public to sway so much from pipelines which are likely much, much safer over time,” said Arthur Salzer, chief executive officer of Northland Wealth Management, which oversees C$225 million. “It is going to be something that’s going to weigh on the public’s mind.”

more...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-07/quebec-disaster-spurs-rail-versus-pipelines-debate-on-oil.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quebec Disaster Spurs Rail-Versus-Pipelines Debate on Oil (Original Post) Purveyor Jul 2013 OP
How convenient. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #1
Interesting. That was my first thought, too. PDJane Jul 2013 #2
and what happens when a pipeline blows up? gopiscrap Jul 2013 #3
I don't know the history of pipelines explosions but I would be surprised if there was one in the Purveyor Jul 2013 #4

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
2. Interesting. That was my first thought, too.
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 11:33 AM
Jul 2013

Especially when one of those comments came from an unspecified agent of the government.

I would point out, however, that the water table tends to be polluted either way, and the companies that run the pipelines are resisting updates and state of the art leak trackers.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
4. I don't know the history of pipelines explosions but I would be surprised if there was one in the
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 01:12 PM
Jul 2013

last 25 years on the scale of this Quebec disaster.

I'm all but certain there have been more 'tragic' incidents involving chemical hauling trains than pipelines.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Quebec Disaster Spurs Rai...