General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho was right when America needed them to be right? Who opposed DOMA in the 1996 debate?
At the time, 342 voted in favor of the law and 67 opposed it in the House of Representatives. And in the Senate, 85 voted in favor it, 14 opposed.... Here are some of the lawmakers who had the political courage to say no to DOMA when it first came up in Congress:Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.): I rise in strong opposition to this ill-named Defense of Marriage Act and I do so on the basis of conscience, Constitution and constituency.
Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii): I understand some of the people who are sponsoring this bill are on their second or third marriages. I wonder which one they are defending.
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.): Whether senators are for or against same-sex marriage, there are ample reasons to vote against this bill because it represents an unconstitutional exercise of congressional power.
Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.): I recognize that my views are likely to be in the minority as well as unpopular, but this isnt the first time Ive come to the well to stand up for what I believe in, and it wont be the last.
Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.): Let us not take part in this assault on lesbian and gay Americans and their families.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.): Discrimination is discrimination, and it is wrong.
Rep. Lynn Rivers (D-Mich.): I rise in opposition to this bill and I oppose it with both my head and my heart.
Sen. Charles Robb (D-Va.): I feel very strongly that this legislation is fundamentally wrong, and feeling as I do it would not be true to my conscience or my oath of office if I fail to speak out against it.
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif): To me, this is ugly politics. To me, it is about dividing us instead of bringing us together. To me, it is about scapegoating. To me, it is a diversion from what we should be doing.
Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.): These couples are not hurting us with their actions, in fact they may be helping us by showing us that love can indeed conquer prejudice and hatred.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.): The arguments against gay and lesbian marriage are essentially the same argument that we used to hear against black-white marriages.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.): This bill isnt conservative. Its Big Brother to the core. My judgment is this is a subject that the federal government ought not stick its nose into.
Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.): Why do you want to destroy the love they hold in their hearts? Why do you want to crush their hopes, their dreams, their unions, their aspirations? We are talking about human beings, people like you.
Rep. Steve Gunderson (R-Wis.): Why shouldnt my partner of 13 years be entitled to the same health insurance and survivors benefits that individuals around here, my colleagues with second and third wives are able to give to them?
Rep. Patsy Mink (D-Hawaii): It seems to be quite apparent that our court system is going to yield a decision which will validate same-sex marriage.
Rep. Gerry Studds (D-Mass.): We are going to prevail, Mr. Chairman. And were going to prevail just as every other component of the Civil Rights movement in this country has prevailed.
Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun (D-Ill.): I hope that every person on this floor who is going to look at and vote on this bill considers for a moment what the judgment of history might be if 50 years from now their grandchildren look at their debates and look at their words in support of this mean-spirited legislation, and consider the judgment that will be cast upon them then.
http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/03/28/speaking-out-who-opposed-doma-during-1996-debate/
It's a lot easier to support marriage equality today than it was back then. These forward-thinking people deserve praise for their political courage.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)This must be the first negative thing I've heard about Wellstone's voting record.
Still a good hit-to-miss ratio, comparing to what we have today.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)vote on their record.
Someone who's good 99.9% of the time isn't bad.
Our nation would be so much better with even 10 Wellstones in there.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Plus, humans make mistakes, which gives them a chance to learn and evolve. I'd rather have humans representing me than some sort of infallible beings.
10 Wellstones in Washington would have saved us from allot of the stuff that we are dealing with now.
dsc
(52,187 posts)both of whom did this while representing states that aren't known for being gay rights bastions. Most of the rest of that list represent places that are far more gay friendly than the average place, those two didn't.
cali
(114,904 posts)Pat Leahy, alas, vote for it. Like Wellstone, he's said it was his worst vote.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)pnwmom
(109,031 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.