General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGreta Van Susteren Criticizes Fellow Fox Newser Cal Thomas' Ugly Attack On Rachel Maddow
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201202100011Greta Van Susteren Criticizes Fellow Fox Newser Cal Thomas' Ugly Attack On Rachel Maddow
February 10, 2012 2:06 pm ET by Terry Krepel
Video @ link~
During his appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Thursday, Cal Thomas cracked that MSNBC host Rachel Maddow "is the best argument in favor of her parents using contraception. I would be all for that. And all of the rest of the crowd at MSNBC, too, for that matter" (h/t Think Progress).
Maddow responded to Thomas' comment on her show Thursday night: "Mr. Fox News person speaking there, I am sorry that you feel that way about me, that you wish I had never been born. Personally, I'm glad that you were born. Otherwise, how would Republicans get the special Fox News bat signal that it's time to be outraged now, about what used to be Republicans' own policy idea?"
In addition to being a syndicated columnist, Thomas is a regular panelist on Fox News' "media criticism" show, Fox News Watch. In 2012, he has appeared on the January 14, January 28, and February 4 editions of the weekly show.
Thomas' comment was so offensive that at least one of his Fox News co-workers has called for him to apologize. On her Gretawire blog, Fox News host Greta Van Susteren wrote: "Cal Thomas needs to pick up the phone and make a personal call to Rachel Maddow. Then he needs to publicly apologize."
Does Van Susteren's criticism portend Fox News itself sanctioning Thomas for his ugly remarks about Maddow? We shall see.
Thrill
(19,178 posts).
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)if they represented my company, agency etc..
Quantess
(27,630 posts)He should be embarrassed if he has any sort of self-awareness of how crass, how graceless, it makes him look.
Especially saying that to someone with such a classy, graceful character as Rachel Maddow.
spanone
(135,831 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)......but in a really cool way.
renie408
(9,854 posts)It's like they haven't figured out that whatever they do, whatever they say, it is going to be all over everywhere in fifteen minutes these days. Do they really think that because the comments were made at CPAC, that a broader audience isn't going to hear about them?
Spazito
(50,332 posts)I certainly agree with her here. Even further, Mr. Thomas should be stricken off the list of contributors to Fox but I doubt that will happen, they may even give him greater prominence as seem to be their obscene habit.
nbolick
(16 posts)malaise
(268,986 posts)Stanford, Oxford, Rhodes Scholar, PhD and best host of them all.
Fuck Fox!!!
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)The only time a RWer apologizes is to get out of criminal prosecution or to avoid civil litigation.
Issuing a sincere apology would make them look like they were in the wrong and their ego just
can't handle something like that. Thus anything that remotely sounds like an aoplogy just drips
with insincerity because it was done out of expediency.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)you know they've sunk pretty low when even their own peers at that shitty station are offended
babylonsister
(171,065 posts)Graybeard
(6,996 posts)Told Rachel she could make it public on her show. I don't know if he intends to apologize on the air.
Redstate Bluegirl
(213 posts)I wouldn't be surprised.