Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tsarnaev Brothers May Have Planned To Go To NYC After Boston Marathon Bombings (Original Post) dkf Apr 2013 OP
oh my. OKNancy Apr 2013 #1
Because it's always a courtesy to let your carjacking victim know where you are going jberryhill Apr 2013 #2
Yeah, I'm having a hard time believing some of the stuff from the car jacking. LeftofObama Apr 2013 #8
Apparently the carjacking victim told the cops immediately Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #9
It's the reporting that sucks jberryhill Apr 2013 #12
what exactly is the difference between these two sentences: onenote Apr 2013 #24
The headline says "NYC" jberryhill Apr 2013 #25
I travel between Boston and New York quite a bit and when I leave Boston onenote Apr 2013 #27
I'm not harassing or impugning the car jacking victim at all. LeftofObama Apr 2013 #14
The article in the OP says "New York" jberryhill Apr 2013 #10
Not me - it's got teenage dumbassery written all over it Taverner Apr 2013 #28
Now one is in New Jersey, the other one heading there. Xipe Totec Apr 2013 #3
Glad they caught him. hrmjustin Apr 2013 #4
Funny how before an event, the authorities know nothing - truedelphi Apr 2013 #5
It's the same reason why there are a lot of "history" courses and few "future" courses jberryhill Apr 2013 #13
I took a great course once on the History of the Future alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #18
Well I confess to being somewhat facetious in my original remark truedelphi Apr 2013 #22
Very professional, like their disguises TheCowsCameHome Apr 2013 #6
Or may not have... More unnamed sources, because, as we all know, unnamed sources have been so Mass Apr 2013 #7
But ya gotta admit - it's pretty easy for authorities to now truedelphi Apr 2013 #20
Yet they went down Arsenal St. in Watertown Warpy Apr 2013 #11
May have. Or may not have. Mariana Apr 2013 #15
And from there BeyondGeography Apr 2013 #16
Article says NY : not NYC. dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #17
There's little doubt that they were heading to Colonie alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #19
I'm sorry. liberalmuse Apr 2013 #21
Glenn Beck is always looking for more traffic to his sites snooper2 Apr 2013 #23
I think it's time to ban Mercedes-Benz (nt) bigwillq Apr 2013 #26
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. Because it's always a courtesy to let your carjacking victim know where you are going
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:02 PM
Apr 2013

That way, the owner can more easily retrieve the car when you are done with it.

Common carjacking courtesy that is.

LeftofObama

(4,243 posts)
8. Yeah, I'm having a hard time believing some of the stuff from the car jacking.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:08 PM
Apr 2013

First they tell the victim that they are indeed the bombers and now they tell the victim that they are going to NYC to apparently blow up more stuff.

It kind of reminds me of some of those old TV shows where the criminal ties you up and then lays out his plan in detail.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
9. Apparently the carjacking victim told the cops immediately
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:20 PM
Apr 2013

that they said they were the bombers. Therefore it's credible.

Also, they loaded up not just firearms but a lot of their homemade bombs. Therefore they seem to have intended to do something with them.

Let's not harass and impugn the poor carjacking victim. Pressure cooker bombs and those other IEDs are not the type of stuff you carry along with you if you are just trying to get out of Dodge.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
12. It's the reporting that sucks
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:24 PM
Apr 2013

Nobody has a beef with the carjacking victim.

The continued non-existent editing of news copy is the appalling thing here.

Let's take a basic fact - they said they were going to "New York". The article implies that means the city.

However, regardless of what they said, the notion that a carjacker will helpfully provide his/her destination, instead of saying they are going one place instead of another, requires a certain amount of non-thinking to take such a statement at face value.

Accurate reporting would be that "they said they were going to New York" instead of "they were planning to go to New York". There is a difference there.

onenote

(43,879 posts)
24. what exactly is the difference between these two sentences:
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 04:18 PM
Apr 2013

"they told him that they planned to head to New York" (the sentence in the story)

and

"they said they were going to New York" (the sentence you suggest would be more accurate).

Given that we don't know the exact words they spoke, either is possible. As for the plausibility of them telling the car owner what they were going to do next...well, I don't think there is a guidebook for what one is supposed to say or not say in these situations so, again, it doesn't strike me as particularly implausible that these guys would say anything and everything that came into their heads. Maybe just hearing the sound of their own voices was somehow reassuring to them. Maybe they're just stupid. Maybe. Maybe. Maybe.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
25. The headline says "NYC"
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 04:23 PM
Apr 2013

I wasn't suggesting a better quote, just simply typing without looking up.

Did they say "New York City" as implied by the headline, or did they say "New York" as stated in the article.

Again, with feeling, if someone says "New York" it does not necessarily imply "New York City". But someone put "NYC" in the headline, while the article says "New York".

But "may have planned to go to NYC" is different from "said they were going to New York"

On edit:

Look again at the two quotes I used, and your reproduction of them. "they were planning to go to New York" and "they said they were planning to go to New York" are also two different things.

onenote

(43,879 posts)
27. I travel between Boston and New York quite a bit and when I leave Boston
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 04:28 PM
Apr 2013

I usually just tell people I'm heading to New York and they get the drift that I mean New York City. If I was going to Albany, I'd say "Im going to Albany" or "I'm going upstate". I'd never say I'm going to New York since that wouldn't tell anyone anything useful.

LeftofObama

(4,243 posts)
14. I'm not harassing or impugning the car jacking victim at all.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:31 PM
Apr 2013

I feel horrible for what happened to the victim! I'm just talking about the reporting. They have all but implied that the bombing suspects twirled the edges of their mustache while they laid out their dastardly plan.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
10. The article in the OP says "New York"
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:20 PM
Apr 2013

Which, the last time I checked, was an entire state, and not just a particular city in it. That's why they selected their motto "The Entire State" to avoid confusion.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
5. Funny how before an event, the authorities know nothing -
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:06 PM
Apr 2013

But immediately after an event they are suddenly omniscient. What would explain that? (Off to scratch my head for a while.)

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
18. I took a great course once on the History of the Future
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:42 PM
Apr 2013

Basically a history of how the concept of the "future" has operated in human thought (i.e., our concept of "the future" has a fairly recent provenance).

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
22. Well I confess to being somewhat facetious in my original remark
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 04:01 PM
Apr 2013

And then there are reports like this one, which lead to even bigger questions, don't they?

Mass

(27,315 posts)
7. Or may not have... More unnamed sources, because, as we all know, unnamed sources have been so
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:07 PM
Apr 2013

reliable last week.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
20. But ya gotta admit - it's pretty easy for authorities to now
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:19 PM
Apr 2013

Mind meld all heinous activities the dead man had been planning.

Meanwhile Sibel Edmond lets the world know that getting the USA into Syria and having that nation become our client state is very important to keep the balance of world's energy firmly in the USA domination side of things.

Warpy

(112,767 posts)
11. Yet they went down Arsenal St. in Watertown
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:20 PM
Apr 2013

instead of popping over onto the Mass. Pike.

Makes no sense. But then again, very little of this stuff makes any sense.

Mariana

(14,913 posts)
15. May have. Or may not have.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:33 PM
Apr 2013

C'mon, jackasses in the media, just shut the fuck up until you actually KNOW something. Stop publishing all these fucking rumours and hearsay from unnamed people who probably know jack shit. May have. Give me a break.

liberalmuse

(18,832 posts)
21. I'm sorry.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:34 PM
Apr 2013

My bullshit meter is pinging big time with some of the details in the carjacking story. I'm sure I'll be banned from DU for even questioning the "official" storyline, but c'mon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tsarnaev Brothers May Hav...