Innocent Until Proven Guilty; Imminent Until Proven — Too Late!
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/02/12-3
Code Pink protesters disrupt the start of John Brennan's Senate confirmation hearing. (Image: Getty Images)
Those defending the language on imminence in the white paper released last week are right on one count: it is not new language. Below the fold, Ive excerpted the language on imminence from three different formulations on imminence Brennans speech at Harvard, the white paper, and Holders Northwestern speech to show the consistency (and also, with John Brennans September 16, 2011 speech, exactly two weeks to Anwar al-Awlaki notice that this was now US policy).
All three point to al Qaedas non-combatant structure to describe the need for a more flexible concept of imminence. Both the white paper and Holders speech discuss a window of opportunity, which I find to be one of the more provocative aspects of this definition. And while Holders speech appears to have been edited to make it pretty, it is almost precisely the ideas presented in the white paper on imminence. There is clear continuity between Brennans 2011 speech, the white paper, and Holders speech.
Which is why Im interested in the language Brennan used last week when responding to Angus Kings proposal for a FISA court for drone (and what should be targeted killing generally).
Its telling not because it introduces wholesale new ideas. But because it makes clear what is implicit but unstated in the three other formulations.