Ten Years After Powell’s U.N. Speech, Old Hands are Ready for More Blood
http://www.nationofchange.org/ten-years-after-powell-s-un-speech-old-hands-are-ready-more-blood-1360074910
Fast forward to the current era. What are Richard Cohen and Jim Hoagland writing -- about Iran?
On February 6, 2012, exactly nine years after proclaiming that only a fool could doubt Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, Cohens column declared flatly: The ultimate remedy is Iranian regime change. Four months ago, Cohen wrapped up a column by observing there is still time for Iran to back down before President Obamas red line -- no nuclear weapon -- is crossed. This is a war whose time has not yet come. Not yet.
Hoagland -- a decade after telling readers they should put their trust in Colin Powells convincing and detailed X-ray of Iraqs secret weapons -- is now making clear that his patience with Iran is wearing thin. Until recently, Hoagland wrote five weeks ago, I had been relatively comfortable with Obamas assertions that there is time to reach a peaceful resolution with Iran. Hoaglands column went on to say that military strikes on Iran threaten disastrous political and economic consequences for the world, so diplomatic efforts should try to avert the need for such strikes -- before they become necessary.
So goes the dominant spectrum of opinionating and policymaking for war, from eagerness to reluctance. Propaganda lead-ups to warfare are as varied as wars themselves; and yet every style of such propaganda relies on deception, and every war is unspeakable horror.
After jumping onto ghastly bandwagons for one war after another, the nations media establishment is available to do it again. So is the current U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. So is the new secretary of state. Theyre old hands, dripping with blood. They have not had enough