Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:00 AM Feb 2013

hillary 2016?

This thread was inspired in part by this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1251&pid=283518

Though we have seen many others.

Look, let me get this down straight off: Yes, if Hillary becomes the nominee in 2016, I will vote for her.

Now for a good many people, they will leave it at there and say "OK, when we get her up there, shut up and follow orders.", There will also be a hidden subtext of "like you should have done in 2008."

I will also admit that Hillary can be a juggernaut, especially with 8 years of being SoS, and Bill ready to do whatever it takes so he can die in his old White House, making it his house.

So, why does this talk of Hillary as anointed one annoy me?

Yes, it does rip open all the old wounds of the 2008 campaign, where people insulted me because I was young, and accused me of being a sexist because I preferred both Obama and Edwards over Hillary. People who I counted on as friends during the American dark ages (aka the reign of Bush Jr.) all of a sudden insulted me, and talked about how they would screw me over. Even Smirking Chimp, that old solace, offered no relief.

Of course, at the 11th hour, that favorite hour, Hillary threw her weight towards Obama, and I was grateful. However, I do not forget why I did not vote for her, namely because neither she nor her husband admit that the stuff they gave away has cost us, from NAFTA, to the telecommunications act, to killing Glass-Steagall.

Those three measures alone cost us.

Now,if she were to come out saying that she would undo ONE, merely ONE of those mistakes, and admit they were MISTAKES, I would be joining the Draft Hillary 2016 club.

And let us not forget that she is a war hawk. Israel has been yelling at us, demanding that war with Iran, as if we were servants that were too slow. Hillary seems too eager to follow that old recipe for a Woman to get respect, act more ruthless than a man, which means, like Meir and Thatcher, you need to start killing people, preferably of the brown variety that stand in the way of whatever you wish to take.

I could be wrong, and yes, I will support whoever runs. I am a true Yellow Dog democrat. But do not think that i will forget who moved this party sol;eft that our choices seem to be between Center Right and Galt's Gulch.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
hillary 2016? (Original Post) DonCoquixote Feb 2013 OP
that pretty well sums up the thought of Hillary 2016 should be frightening. Whisp Feb 2013 #1
Oh, so the Clinton's were in cahoots with the bush's.... cynatnite Feb 2013 #2
you don't find the sequence of events at all odd? Whisp Feb 2013 #35
Tinfoil hats are not my thing. n/t cynatnite Feb 2013 #56
I'm simply burned out on the Clintons and wish we could find someone else to run. BlueStater Feb 2013 #3
I've been saying the same also Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #34
Hillary isn't running. SheilaT Feb 2013 #4
Thank you. N/T BlueStater Feb 2013 #5
I am so tired of people who disparage the old dsc Feb 2013 #7
I do not care about age DonCoquixote Feb 2013 #8
"writes for a living at scrabble"??? Matariki Feb 2013 #9
it means that one comma can totally change the meaning of a sentence. Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #11
she played a person who writes for a living (news paper) and beat her at scrabble. dsc Feb 2013 #12
I'm quite pleased that your 97 year old grandmother can help you at bridge. SheilaT Feb 2013 #15
I meant she beats the aunt playing scrabble dsc Feb 2013 #16
Age is dependent on how young you act. Jennicut Feb 2013 #38
Bridge is an extremely challenging game to play well. It means she is sharp. stevenleser Feb 2013 #49
You forgot the Commodity Futures Modernization Act signed by Bill Clinton. antigop Feb 2013 #6
I think we should at the very least wait until after the 2014 elections to worry about it. Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #10
Good grief! HappyMe Feb 2013 #13
Yes! greatauntoftriplets Feb 2013 #30
Wow - this is hilarious. DURHAM D Feb 2013 #14
well, she did tend to try to take credit for Bill's 'good stuff' Whisp Feb 2013 #17
I have noticed that you never miss a chance to trash Hillary - DURHAM D Feb 2013 #20
I believe that voting for someone just because they are a woman Whisp Feb 2013 #22
My comment was not about voting. DURHAM D Feb 2013 #25
ah, the furiner is not allowed to speak! Whisp Feb 2013 #28
Hear, hear!!! Beacool Feb 2013 #31
I could wait for replies discussing the points I brought up Whisp Feb 2013 #32
Oh, please. Beacool Feb 2013 #36
so you believe that if one is not an American they have no say in US politics? Whisp Feb 2013 #39
Suit yourself. Beacool Feb 2013 #40
that country can go and do all kinds of shit to their neighbours Whisp Feb 2013 #43
no more neoliberals datasuspect Feb 2013 #18
Could we put off this discussion until November, 2014, please? MineralMan Feb 2013 #19
maybe you are right but it's the media that you should probably be sending your comments to Whisp Feb 2013 #24
I'm hoping Elizabeth Warren quickly amasses a solid record of both good legislation and TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #21
the two Davids. :) Whisp Feb 2013 #23
The Two Davids and/or Jim Messina, I should have said. TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #29
I hope I don't have to learn a new last name! NoOneMan Feb 2013 #26
No. No more 3rd Way, DLC, part-time Democrats. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #27
I see that the thought of a Hillary for president campaign has some of you in a tizzy. Beacool Feb 2013 #33
take for example Rendell - Hillary could jsut simply say: Ed, stfu, and he would. Whisp Feb 2013 #37
I know Rendell, he always speaks his mind. Beacool Feb 2013 #42
3. If she does decide to throw her hat in the ring, there will be a lot of us out there making sure DonCoquixote Feb 2013 #45
Suit yourself. Beacool Feb 2013 #47
was that before or after Hillary lost to Obama? DonCoquixote Feb 2013 #48
just checking if you are an American because Whisp Feb 2013 #41
Ooohhh, the drama....... Beacool Feb 2013 #44
I do consider the possibility of war pretty dramatic Whisp Feb 2013 #46
That's why you injected country of citizenship into this discussion? Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #52
no, that was told to me. that because I cannot vote Whisp Feb 2013 #53
Well, you citizenship is of no issue to me. An intelligent opinion is always welcome. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #54
You mean neighbour to neighbor Whisp Feb 2013 #50
Wrong country, but they look delicious. Beacool Feb 2013 #55
I find it hard to believe someone implied you were sexist for supporting Obama in 2008. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #51
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
1. that pretty well sums up the thought of Hillary 2016 should be frightening.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:15 AM
Feb 2013

let us not forget that Bill Clinton sanctioned Iraq for his whole presidency. Poppy Bush got in on Desert Storm, Bill weakened Iraq for 8 years, then Dim Son came in with his PNACer liar friends and finished the place off.

This was not disconnected. This was a plan. This is why Hillary voted for the war.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
2. Oh, so the Clinton's were in cahoots with the bush's....
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:18 AM
Feb 2013

all just so they could go to war in Iraq after 9/11?

Gotcha.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
3. I'm simply burned out on the Clintons and wish we could find someone else to run.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:22 AM
Feb 2013

The fact that we seemingly can't, in a country of 300 million people, is just pathetic.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
4. Hillary isn't running.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:51 AM
Feb 2013

She's said so more than once.

And even though I admire her and she did a fantastic job of Secretary of State, she's old and tired. And I mean old in not just her age -- although she'll turn 69 in 2016 and I honestly think being President is a job for a younger person -- but she's been out there long enough. She was considered The Annointed One in 2008, and oddly enough, that didn't do the trick.

I'm also incredibly frustrated by all these Hillary Is The One threads. I keep on pointing out that in 2004, no one, but no one, even thought Barack Obama would run four years later, let alone win. The conventional wisdom at that point was how his time would come in 2012 or 2016.

And I also point out that in 1991 it was obvious to the most casual observer that George H. W. Bush was riding so high because of the success of the Gulf War that all the other potential Democratic candidates at that point one by one dropped out of the race. Remind me again about his second term? Oh, wait. Some guy, a governor of some small state in the south decided to run.

We just have no way of knowing at this point what's going to happen over the next four (well, three anyway before the next campaign really heats up) years, and who will be a likely candidate at that point. Really. Honestly.

dsc

(52,161 posts)
7. I am so tired of people who disparage the old
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:18 AM
Feb 2013

My grandmother was able at 97 to be me at bridge and my aunt, who is a Phd and writes for a living at scrabble. 69 is hardly old.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
15. I'm quite pleased that your 97 year old grandmother can help you at bridge.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 01:49 PM
Feb 2013

Do think maybe there just a tiny little bit of difference between helping you at bridge and being President? Maybe just a little?

You didn't say how old your aunt is, but great that she has her PhD, however, while I'm not entirely sure exactly what you mean by "writes for a living at scrabble", I'm sure she's quite good at what she does. How many hours a day is she currently working? 10, 12, 16?

I'm 64 myself, so I know that 69 isn't all that old for many people, but everywhere I look there are people over the age of 50 who are in declining health, struggle to maintain a full-time job and so on. Yeah, the president always has access to much better health care than the vast majority of us, but the simple fact is 60 is NOT the new 40, 70 is NOT the new 50. There's a reality about the passage of time that needs to be acknowledged. Plus, quite frankly, my biggest gripe about Obama is how he has pulled in far too many from past administrations to serve in his. We need genuinely new blood and new ideas in running this country.

dsc

(52,161 posts)
16. I meant she beats the aunt playing scrabble
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 01:52 PM
Feb 2013

somehow I think you knew that but decided to be snippy instead. so frankly I refuse to give you anymore answers.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
38. Age is dependent on how young you act.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:26 PM
Feb 2013

My parents are quite youthful at 65 and get mistaken for younger but some of their friends seem old. McCain was an old 72, Biden seems to not be as old despite being 70. Hillary seemed very active until her health scare.
I would need to see the people running in debates and on the campaign trail to decide.
I'm in my 30's so pretty much everyone running is older then me. Paul Ryan was a Gen Xer like me and pretty abysmal. I worry more about ideas then age.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
6. You forgot the Commodity Futures Modernization Act signed by Bill Clinton.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:13 AM
Feb 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Futures_Modernization_Act_of_2000
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA) is United States federal legislation that officially ensured the deregulation of financial products known as over-the-counter derivatives. It was signed into law on December 21, 2000 by President Bill Clinton. It clarified the law so that most over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions between “sophisticated parties” would not be regulated as “futures” under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936 (CEA) or as “securities” under the federal securities laws. Instead, the major dealers of those products (banks and securities firms) would continue to have their dealings in OTC derivatives supervised by their federal regulators under general “safety and soundness” standards. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) desire to have “Functional regulation” of the market was also rejected. Instead, the CFTC would continue to do “entity-based supervision of OTC derivatives dealers.” [1] These derivatives, especially the credit default swap, would be at the heart of the financial crisis of 2008 and the subsequent 2008–2012 global recession.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
10. I think we should at the very least wait until after the 2014 elections to worry about it.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 04:53 AM
Feb 2013

This is like setting up the Christmas displays before the 4th of July.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
14. Wow - this is hilarious.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 11:25 AM
Feb 2013

That damn Hillary signed NAFTA, the telecommunications bill, and Glass Steagall. She should definitely NOT be President again.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
17. well, she did tend to try to take credit for Bill's 'good stuff'
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:04 PM
Feb 2013

but back away from unpopular stuff like NAFTA.

She picked and chose which would benefit her more and Bill will be back in the WH to influence policy way more than she influenced his.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
20. I have noticed that you never miss a chance to trash Hillary -
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:17 PM
Feb 2013

it seems to be your thing. I do find it odd given that you are supposed to be a feminist and even more interesting because you can't vote in our elections.

As regards NAFTA - during the primary Obama and Hillary both said that some things needed to be changed in the agreement. However, immediately after Obama made his comments he had Samantha Power contact members of your government to tell them he was "just kidding" and not to worry.



 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
22. I believe that voting for someone just because they are a woman
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:29 PM
Feb 2013

is like the history of voting for someone just because they were a white man. I've had quite enough of that.

It's the character that counts, or should. And, being a feminist of the kind you apparently don't approve , I won't be supporting anyone who voted for the phoney mass murder of Iraq or who continually has her people say how 'tough' she is - that is a red flag waving all over for aggression to prove something. The IWR vote was a terrible, terrible judgement and really should be considered very closely of one who is to be CiC.

Sorry if this is offensive to you.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
25. My comment was not about voting.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:35 PM
Feb 2013

It was about your gratuitous trashing. Proceed...

ETA: Well, it was about voting given the fact that you can't vote.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
32. I could wait for replies discussing the points I brought up
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:12 PM
Feb 2013

but that isn't going to happen - it's just too gosh darned uncomfortable.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
36. Oh, please.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:19 PM
Feb 2013

You assume that what you don't like is what others don't like too. You don't like Hillary, that's fine. You can't vote in the US, so why do you even care who will be the nominee in 2016?

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
39. so you believe that if one is not an American they have no say in US politics?
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:29 PM
Feb 2013

really now?

isn't that just too interesting.

Want me to take back what I said against Bush Jr?

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
40. Suit yourself.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:46 PM
Feb 2013

I just wouldn't be that worked up about candidates of a country I don't even live in.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
43. that country can go and do all kinds of shit to their neighbours
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:50 PM
Feb 2013

and alround the world and have over all it's history.

so yah, I feel I have a right to get a bit worked up about who is behind that wheel and what their intentions may be.

lordy.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
19. Could we put off this discussion until November, 2014, please?
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:10 PM
Feb 2013

We have a Congressional election coming up in 2014. Let's focus on one election at a time and start finding suitable candidates for the congressional districts and state where we live. Let's find Democrats who can win those elections and work to get them nominated.

We can hold off on fighting about who should run for President after that election. It's very likely that it may be someone we're not even mentioning right now. Four years is a long time.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
24. maybe you are right but it's the media that you should probably be sending your comments to
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:34 PM
Feb 2013

clintons surrogates are all over talking about her inevitability and that the office if hers if she just nods - and she's even more powerful than Cleopatra! omg lolz.

so sure, I am sick of this too - but tell the Rendells and other minions to stop with the silliness. If they want to start silly talk, there is no reason why opposition has to be silent about it.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
21. I'm hoping Elizabeth Warren quickly amasses a solid record of both good legislation and
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:24 PM
Feb 2013

votes, and good Senate floor speeches, and then gets in touch with the Two Davids about a national campaign strategy in late 2014.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
23. the two Davids. :)
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:32 PM
Feb 2013

yeh, I think Elizabeth is close enough to Obama's vision and integrity that her using the David's software could be very effective. I don't believe that can work for everyone, but for Warren, I do.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
29. The Two Davids and/or Jim Messina, I should have said.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 02:41 PM
Feb 2013

I always forget him, but he was a champ this last go-round. I think any of them could do for Warren what they did for Obama.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
33. I see that the thought of a Hillary for president campaign has some of you in a tizzy.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:16 PM
Feb 2013

1. It is not Hillary who is pushing it. The media is the one who keeps beating this to death.

2. Hillary probably doesn't know herself whether she wants to run again or not.

3. If she does decide to throw her hat in the ring, there will be a lot of us out there making sure that this time around she does get the nomination.

4. It's still a free country, vote for the candidate of your preference.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
37. take for example Rendell - Hillary could jsut simply say: Ed, stfu, and he would.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:24 PM
Feb 2013

she is allowing this to happen, don't for a minute think she has no control over her people and what they are supposed to say.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
42. I know Rendell, he always speaks his mind.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:49 PM
Feb 2013

As long as people are not claiming to represent her, she's not going to stop them from saying whatever they please. And no, she doesn't control Ed. He doesn't work for her.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
45. 3. If she does decide to throw her hat in the ring, there will be a lot of us out there making sure
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:57 PM
Feb 2013

that this time around she does get the nomination. "

Yes, and if the democrats have anyone to the left of her, we will vote for them.

And if she wins, some of us will give Hillary the same level of respect Arianna H and Jane H give Obama: golf claps at best, scorn at worst.

and if she does go to war with iran to make her friends in Tel Aviv happy, then all bets are off, including whether or not this nation will survive a war which will get the Russians and Chinese involved.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
47. Suit yourself.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 04:00 PM
Feb 2013

Unlike many of you in 2008, I don't believe in anybody being forced to vote for someone they don't like. Vote for the Republican, vote third party or stay home. Your life, your choice.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
48. was that before or after Hillary lost to Obama?
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 04:19 PM
Feb 2013

and you know damned well votign GOP or third party are the same thing...Like I said, if she wins the primary, I will vote for her, and then spend the next four years keeping her and Bill away from the right wing stuff they love so much.

Magic word, Primary.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
41. just checking if you are an American because
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 03:48 PM
Feb 2013

according to some here, if you are not American you have no business talking US politics or at least criticizing a Clinton!

Yes, here on DU there are people that don't want to discuss some very uncomfortable things when it comes to the Crowning of Hillary and her qualifications and her decisions in the past - but what they want to do is shut you up.

Maybe Skinner should go through the logs and just dirt nap all us furiners?

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
46. I do consider the possibility of war pretty dramatic
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 04:00 PM
Feb 2013

and trying to avoid it any way possible can bring up some drama, sure.

don't you?

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
53. no, that was told to me. that because I cannot vote
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 07:23 PM
Feb 2013

then I should shut up.

I think you missed something but I am happy to fill you in.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
54. Well, you citizenship is of no issue to me. An intelligent opinion is always welcome.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 07:39 PM
Feb 2013

So, state your business and tell the idiots to piss off.

Works for me.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
55. Wrong country, but they look delicious.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 11:16 PM
Feb 2013

I love margaritas.

Here's something Canadian.



A Crown Royal whiskey sour.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»hillary 2016?