General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRaw milk sales spike despite CDC's warnings of risk associated with bird flu
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/raw-milk-sales-spike-despite-cdcs-warnings-of-risk-associated-with-bird-fluSales of raw milk appear to be on the rise, despite years of warnings about the health risks of drinking the unpasteurized products and an outbreak of bird flu in dairy cows.
Since March 25, when the bird flu virus was confirmed in U.S. cattle for the first time, weekly sales of raw cows milk have ticked up 21% to as much as 65% compared with the same periods a year ago, according to the market research firm NielsenIQ.
That runs counter to advice from the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which calls raw milk one of the riskiest foods people can consume.
Raw milk can be contaminated with harmful germs that can make you very sick, the CDC says on its website.
As of Monday, at least 42 herds in nine states are known to have cows infected with the virus known as type A H5N1, federal officials said.
*snip*
a kennedy
(29,956 posts)Im sure they are.
we can do it
(12,241 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,454 posts)People just buy into stuff that everything was great before we had all these advancements in science. They weren't. People got sick from drinking milk on the regular before pasteurization with terrible and sometimes deadly diseases like listeriosis, typhoid fever, tuberculosis, diphtheria and brucellosis.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,187 posts)Response to 50 Shades Of Blue (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
lynintenn
(660 posts)We drink almond or flaxseed milk.
Passages
(286 posts)baffled by the raw milk they sell in their refrigerated section.
republianmushroom
(14,264 posts)Remember horse wormer for covid, in-lieu of covid vaccine ?
usonian
(10,159 posts)One of the wackiest headlines I have seen lately.
https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-05-12/raw-milk-enthusiasts-uncowed-by-bird-flu-risk-in-dairy
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,252 posts)Always love a clever headline
Didn't LA Times have a "Cut off Pecker" headline a couple weeks ago?
haele
(12,731 posts)- immune. I'm thinking it's a 1 in 4 chance of making them dead. At the end of March, it was running basically a 56% mortality rate among humans who reported becoming sick with it - around 254, according to the CDC. As more people report the illness, mortality rate may go down as COVID eventually did but still -56%. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
My sister-in-law law raises chickens, mini- and micro-cows as a side hobby business on 5 acres in Texas; she's keeping an wary eye on their small herd. My brother says their main herd of eight are all goofy and lovable, pretty much pets rather than livestock, and bird flu in the herd would be devastating in more ways than just an economic one.
Haele
orange jar
(139 posts)TikTok, Facebook, Twitter, and pretty much every social media platform has these right wing influencers that promote dangerous, misinformed "naturalist" diets. Raw meat, unpasteurized milk, raw honey, etc
are all being promoted by these influencers as safer and healthier. Some of you may have heard of a guy known as the "Liver King" as an example.
These influencers also tend to be right wing conspiracists who believe the government is trying to intentionally keep us "unhealthy" for control purposes. Unfortunately, a ton of "normal" people get caught up in these diets and become radicalized through them.
NickB79
(19,326 posts)He was exposed a few months ago.
Amazing how much muscle mass a $12,000/month steroid habit can build.
Personally, I think all of these "naturalist" influencers are frauds. There's no way in hell they fully believe that shit, but they're great at fooling the gullible and grifting for their money.
They are dangerous people.
Javaman
(62,582 posts)I get mine from a daily that provides milk to Blue Bell ice cream. They are inspected weekly by the health dept.
I have nothing at all against pasteurization, I do have a beef against homogenization
If I could find milk here in Austin that was pasteurized but not homogenized, I would get it in a heart beat
ProfessorGAC
(65,736 posts)Not understanding your dislike of homogenized milk.
It's still 3-3.5% butterfat, just like non-homogenized whole milk.
It's just that the particles are so finely divided that the natural emulsification from casein & whey, plus some monglycerides (present in nature) can occur.
But, all the fat, proteins, lactose, & calcium salts are still there.
It's done continuously in sealed piping, so nothing can go away.
Javaman
(62,582 posts)There is no reason to homogenize milk other thank to screw the consumer. They was instituted to control crème content nothing more. Until you have tasted un homogenized milk, you will never know what you are missing.
ProfessorGAC
(65,736 posts)My dad was a milkman all the way back to the glass bottle days. There is no form of milk I haven't had.
The milk without homogenization has the exact same butter fat content as homogenized whole milk.
The butterfat content is controlled by the cow's metabolism, not a dairy.
The cream removed from 2%, 1% or skim milk is used to boost whole milk to half & half or packaged as heavy cream. (Loght cream is 2 parts heavy cream to 1 part whole milk.(
I've seen the process with my own eyes; many times.
Homogenization was not developed to screw the consumer. That's silliness.
SarahD
(1,441 posts)I helped him deliver on weekends. Most of his little old lady customers demanded unhomogenized milk because they skimmed the cream and added it to their coffee. They squealed like stuck pigs if they thought I was being careless. "Young lady! You be careful not to shake that milk!" Homogenized milk was developed in response to complaints about having to shake the milk all the time because most people, unlike the little old ladies, didn't like the cream floating on top.
Javaman
(62,582 posts)homemakers would reject and not buy low cream content milk. They would be able to determine this via the cream level in the glass bottled milk. Homogenization eliminates that.
I have been around long enough to remember getting bottled milk and my mom rejecting some deliveries and telling the milkman that the cream content was too low.
Also this is not purely just from my point of view, check out the book Milk: the 10,000 year history by Mark Kurlansky or the story of milk by Johan Ditlev Frederiksen
SarahD
(1,441 posts)There is a slight, tiny taste difference because the fat globules are not broken up. Milk straight from the bulk tank tastes better because it has more butter fat, not because it is un-homo. My cousins pasteurize their own milk because they milk 800 head and there is too much chance of a problem. I think they gave up pasteurizing at home and just get ordinary milk.from the creamery. They go there twice a day and milk is super cheap because they are co-op members.
Celerity
(44,136 posts)Gammaldags mjölk aka lantmjölk
old fashioned milk aka country milk
it is what we (wifey and I) drink
Mopar151
(10,029 posts)Unless the cow is a close personal friend....... The farmer needs to be supportive of that relationship.
LonePirate
(13,473 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,310 posts)All kinds of fly larvae, parasites, feces from all kinds of animals from mice to foxes and squirrels and whatever flies overhead. Poor and unsanitary food handling also needs to be factored into this equation. You should see how unsanitary many farms are. To make matters worse, most of those who buy raw milk get them from farms that don't treat their animals with antibiotics, or do so and allow them back in after a few weeks offline to allow the meds to subside. Antibiotic treated animals should not be used for milk production while in their system, but some farms don't treat their animals at all, and if you see those farms, some of their animals are deathly looking with mange, botfly and other infections like bovine respiratory disease, pink eye, etc.
Go ahead, drink raw milk from those animals. Most of them don't look like the drawings on those cartons or pictures that are floating around the internet.
NickB79
(19,326 posts)A 50% kill rate is right up there with Ebola.
Voltaire2
(13,511 posts)I would not be surprised if there are quite a few anti-science reactionaries glugging it raw just because its a bad idea.
lindysalsagal
(20,887 posts)Might as well be flat-earthers.
Archae
(46,409 posts)"Raw milk" providers don't have to purchase and maintain pasteurization equipment, and "raw milk" is usually double or even triple the price of store milk.
So the "raw milk" pushers are laughing all the way to the bank.
tanyev
(42,799 posts)Dang. Ive been trying to find some clowns with the new Covid strain for entertainment, but thats been slim pickings so far.
ismnotwasm
(42,051 posts)Lots of TikToks debunking that too, but the damage has been done.
brewens
(13,771 posts)but might pay off in the long run.
Progressive dog
(6,941 posts)I haven't had it in years and can't understand why anyone would choose it over safe, less expensive, and better tasting milk.
tblue37
(65,666 posts)incorrect medical beliefs like the anti-vaxers do.