General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProgressives seek to neutralize AIPAC's spending threats
The promise of an onslaught of spending from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee has loomed over Democratic primaries for months but it hasnt yet materialized.
Progressives critical of Israel, however, think they can exploit even the threat of AIPACs involvement in their races, in yet another sign of the schism among Democrats over the escalating Israel-Hamas war.
Their digital ads warn of the groups influence and seek to energize small-dollar donors. Advocacy groups supporting them have formed an anti-AIPAC coalition to coordinate a defense against the expected influx of cash. Progressive incumbents have sought assistance from their leadership, demanding unified party support to block challenges.
Its an effort to neutralize AIPAC, which has vowed to drop $100 million this cycle to support pro-Israel candidates, including ousting progressives, in part, for their support for Palestinians amid the war. And there are some signs it may be working. Days after Irans attack on Israel, the deep-pocketed lobby group still has yet to turn on the spigots in primaries against some prominent progressives, like Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), the first member of the liberal Squad to face a primary this year.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/17/democrats-aipac-election-spending-00152616
betsuni
(25,601 posts)How are voters bribed to vote for certain Democrats over others by PACs? Nobody has explained that yet.
lapucelle
(18,307 posts)The real story is that the alarmist "evil AIPAC" narrative appears to be falling flat on its face. This has nothing to do with AIPAC having been neutralized by "progressive groups".
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,489 posts)I truly love laughing at the panic and sad emails from this group complaining about the mean Jews and corporate democrats who are campaigning against the Just Us candidates