General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOkay. We're done. Trump just admitted to doing what he's charged with doing. Sentence him and we can all go home.
Trump did say this today. So for him having sex with Story Daniels is a legal expense. ha ha
Trump: I was paying a lawyer and marked it down as a legal expense. Some accountant, I didnt know, marked it down as a legal expense. Thats exactly what it was
So check it out. Its called legal expense
Link to tweet
Omnipresent
(5,831 posts)Silent Type
(3,337 posts)imanamerican63
(13,905 posts)Pretty expensive to buy love in a legal profession?
Johonny
(21,153 posts)To her. Not a legal expense if Cohen was just the middle man to hide the payment source. Cohen has the signed checks and we have Trump's own word he paid Cohen the money. Cohen will testify he paid it to Stormy. It's a pretty easy case. The only question is felony or misdemeanor?
onenote
(43,136 posts)bluestarone
(17,315 posts)former9thward
(32,272 posts)The prosecutor did not make those charges in the indictment as the OP seems to think.
ProudMNDemocrat
(17,163 posts)Breaking one's Cardinal Rule of ADMIT NOTHING does not hold water.
I say commence with the trial and make that man stew in his own offal for the duration.
Polybius
(15,633 posts)I thought this was a civil trial?
Cadfael
(1,303 posts)Good to know!
AllyCat
(16,333 posts)A former and wannabeagain president of the United States is fighting today.
whopis01
(3,544 posts)So many different trials going on at the same time.
Marthe48
(17,306 posts)when he wants to blame someone, they are a face in the crowd. He doesn't know them, never saw them.
PatSeg
(48,159 posts)It is absolutely amazing how many people he "doesn't know" and often they are people he dealt with on a regular basis. If they were people who sued him, then he never met them in his life.
So much for that big brain and great memory.
Redleg
(5,876 posts)and one day, I hope soon, he will pay the price for it.
former9thward
(32,272 posts)Maybe posters should read the indictment.
dpibel
(2,946 posts)through a series of monthly checks, first from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust (the
Defendants Trust)a Trust created under the laws of New York which held the Trump
Organization entity assets after the Defendant was elected Presidentand then from the
Defendants bank account. Each check was processed by the Trump Organization, and each
check was disguised as a payment for legal services rendered in a given month of 2017 pursuant
to a retainer agreement. The payment records, kept and maintained by the Trump Organization,
were false New York business records. In truth, there was no retainer agreement, and Lawyer A
was not being paid for legal services rendered in 2017. The Defendant caused his entities
business records to be falsified to disguise his and others criminal conduct.
That's from the Statement of Facts filed with the indictment.
See also, pages 7-9 of that document. For something that's not charged, Bragg sure seems to have spent a lot of time on it.
Help me understand why this allegation is not supported by Trump's statement re legal fees.
former9thward
(32,272 posts)Those are not necessarily "facts". That aside, those go to whether business records were falsified or not. That is a misdemeanor in New York and the statute of limitations has run on something that occurred 8 years ago. So now Bragg must show a federal campaign finance law was violated in order to turn it into a felony. Even if Trump said business records were falsified (which he didn't) it would not prove what Bragg has charged.
Mr. Evil
(2,889 posts)when he finally realizes that they have the goods on him and he has to decide whether or not to take a plea deal. That would send shockwaves throughout MAGAland.
Initech
(100,296 posts)Ping Tung
(899 posts)MorbidButterflyTat
(1,940 posts)"Some accountant, I didnt know, marked it down as a legal expense."
Oh the great and powerful business man AKA Evil Genius, doesn't know his own accountant???
"Yeah, just some rando accountant, showed up one day, brought coffee, marked down the incriminating evidence as a legal expense. Nothing to do with me!"
IcyPeas
(22,015 posts)aggiesal
(9,001 posts)ToxMarz
(2,173 posts)Duh!
brewens
(13,811 posts)Our bartender that night wrote up the complaint and I knew the woman being booted would say she didn't remember. I told the rest of the trustees beforehand that when she says that we're done. In that case all we have to go on is the bartender's story.
ZonkerHarris
(24,411 posts)progressoid
(50,090 posts)he isn't being charged for paying a lawyer
wiggs
(7,850 posts)coming up (jk), and having to miss rallies I wonder if a plea deal is becoming more appealing to him? No jail...perhaps a few weeks of house arrest, a guilty plea after which he can say he took best deal available....?
The trial is happening RIGHT NOW and he's not in front of a Judge Cannon this time. Is he capable of focusing on his options? What are his attorneys telling him?
Wednesdays
(17,642 posts)to consider any options beyond fighting the charges tooth and nail.