General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is for all the medical and mental health professionals here at DU.
I ran across this while researching the rumors about Trump possibly (probably?) suffering from dementia:
Why this petition matters
Started by
John Gartner Ph.D.
We, the undersigned licensed medical and mental health professionals (INCLUDE YOUR ADVANCED DEGREE IN YOUR LAST NAME WITH NO PUNCTUATION), have a high level of confidence that Donald Trump is showing unmistakable signs of moderate to advanced dementia based on his public behavior and informant reports that show progressive deterioration in memory, thinking, ability to use language, behavior, and both gross and fine motor skills.
*snip*
Lots more here: https://www.change.org/p/we-diagnose-trump-with-probable-dementia-a-petition-for-licensed-professionals-only
I don't have the specified credentials to sign this, but I thought I'd share it so those who do can decide if you'd like to sign it and/or share it with colleagues.
It's not clear who this petition aims to convince, but I found it to be very interesting reading, and the statements from individual signers to be even more fascinating. These statements are also reassuring to me, as an indication that there are a great many smart, dedicated health care professionals in this country who see how profoundly messed up that guy is and want to warn others.
elleng
(131,674 posts)some psychopathology is. See Dr. Bandy Lee. AND Mary Trump.
ShazzieB
(16,745 posts)The underlying psychopathology has always been there, for sure. But he seems to be doing an increasing amount of things like mixing up people and events, mispronouncing familiar words, and using made up ones. Not just once in a while, but just about everyday.
I'm not qualified to determine what all is going on with him, but imo, it doesn't look good.
elleng
(131,674 posts)H2O Man
(73,785 posts)When a person has -- at the same time -- two or more diseases or medical conditions. This is of most concern when there is synergy involvong the diseases/conditions.
A forgetful sociopath isn't a safe choice for a leader. Just my opinion.
lindysalsagal
(20,839 posts)If it becomes "a story" the news can broadcast it.
H2O Man
(73,785 posts)I'm asking because I respect your opinion. Will the media broadcast it? This is just my impression, but it seems like the mainstream media was largely reporting "Biden looks old" up to the SOTU, but ignores the majority of the defendant's screw-ups. It seems like the late night comedians provide better coverage of the defendant's meltdowns.
Note: I might be sensitive about the "looks old" bit, due to the image that appears in my mirror mornings. Also, becayse I remember when the news blacklisted Dr. Bandy Lee for telling the truth. In my opinion, she is an American hero if any exists.
Thanks!
live love laugh
(13,270 posts)ShazzieB
(16,745 posts)It's calling attention to troubling signs that need to be looked at. I see nothing wrong with that.
limbicnuminousity
(1,407 posts)and a community service since the highest office in the land is involved. I'm more concerned about the medical ethics of whoever loaded the Trump White House up with drugs. If Ronny Jackson did his job and reported that Trump was a raving lunatic during his annual exams, too, it wouldn't be necessary for concerned citizens to point out the obvious mental decline of the rapist.
lindysalsagal
(20,839 posts)nolabear
(42,022 posts)but a formal diagnosis is a serious thing and should not be done without examining the patient and in the case of dementia performing appropriate tests. I have lots of opinions about his pathologies but I wouldnt want anyone diagnosing me without ever having seen me.
limbicnuminousity
(1,407 posts)you wouldn't feel comfortable saying "probable dementia?" Not agreeing to a formal diagnosis of dementia without seeing a patient is understandable. But you've probably seen more of Trump in the media than you've seen of some patients. You think "probable" is still a bridge too far?
Just curious, not debating.
nolabear
(42,022 posts)Im still not comfortable. I might be with possible and recommend a thorough exam. The difference with seeing someone in media is theres a great deal you dont see. There needs to be a framework to work in, just as with any study. You need to know what else is there influencing responses as much as possible and whats not there. I appreciate the call for questioning what we see but thats the beginning of a process, not the end.
rubbersole
(6,802 posts)(Your comment is very professional. And ethical.)
nolabear
(42,022 posts)I cannot for the life of me understand why she thought that would be a good idea. Its a pretty good indicator what she thinks of the rest of us simple type folk.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.