General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTennessee Governor Rolls Back Marriage Equality in Just Once Sentence
https://newrepublic.com/post/179253/tennessee-gop-governor-bill-lee-signs-law-same-sex-marriage-rights-equality?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=SF_TNR&utm_medium=socialNo paywall link
https://archive.li/f8MLv
Tennessee has passed a law that, despite being just one sentence long, completely annihilates marriage equality in the state.
Republican Governor Bill Lee signed House Bill 878 into law on Wednesday. The measure simply states, A person shall not be required to solemnize a marriage.
This means that any government official can refuse to certify a marriage license for any reason whatsoever. Current Tennessee law states that before a marriage is legally recognized, the couple must have their marriage license solemnized by a minister or officer. Marriages can be solemnized by religious leaders or government officials including judges, notaries public, and elected officials.
The new law does not affect anyones ability to obtain a marriage license. Republican state Senator Mark Pody, who sponsored the measure in the state Senate, argued last month that the bill was not discriminatory because people can still get marriage licenses.
*snip*
spanone
(137,414 posts)They are Despicable.
Bernardo de La Paz
(50,582 posts)Diamond_Dog
(34,294 posts)Please remind me what year this is again.
Mad_Machine76
(24,766 posts)People can still get a marriage license, however, in order for it to be legally recognized, it has to be solemnized by a "minister" or "officer" but the law does not require anybody to solemnize it? This would seem to run afoul of 2015's Obergerfell ruling (which of course they're hoping to overturn).
TomSlick
(11,703 posts)I am not convinced a government official can constitutionally refuse to solemnize a marriage on religious grounds consistent with Obergerell.
Mad_Machine76
(24,766 posts)Of course, I don't think that clergy has ever been forced to perform any kind of marriage ceremony for anybody.
TomSlick
(11,703 posts)Clergy refuse to perform marriages for all manner of reasons - as is their right.
DFW
(56,281 posts)Republicans will not stop in their efforts to control people's lives, and force themselves into peoples privacy and thwart their happiness, if there is something in that happiness that they dont like. They arrogant, mean, smug and unbelievably petty. How did a whole political party get this way? Just because GOP and NSDAP both end with a P, or what?
keithbvadu2
(39,694 posts)Fla Dem
(25,514 posts)That's how I would understand it. It becomes legal when you get a marriage license, then an official (notary) asks if you accept one another as Husband/ Wife, or Partners and then signs a document making it legal. Of course you can have a much more elaborate religious ceremony.
In 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which, for federal purposes, defined marriage as "only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife"
keithbvadu2
(39,694 posts)There will probably have to be a compromise... don't call it 'marriage'.
Something like legal partner.
That should eliminate the worry over the definition of marriage laws.
TomSlick
(11,703 posts)Any religious component is layered on top of the contract.
Most states require that that a marriage be solemnized, either by clergy or a civil official. There is no requirement for a religious ceremony.
keithbvadu2
(39,694 posts)Chainfire
(17,757 posts)Beausoleil
(2,922 posts)It seems to mean that some entity other than a "person" can solemnize a marriage. A computer, maybe? AI? Virtual minister?