Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMillhiser: The Supreme Court is about to decide whether to sabotage Trump's election theft trial
https://www.vox.com/scotus/2024/2/6/24063557/supreme-court-trump-immunity-dc-circuit-united-states-jack-smith-tanya-chutkanOn Tuesday, a federal appeals court handed down two widely anticipated documents rejecting a particularly unpersuasive legal argument by former President Donald Trump.
The first was a 57-page opinion rejecting Trumps claim that he is immune from prosecution for his failed attempts to overthrow President Joe Bidens victory in the 2020 election. Trump claimed he was immune because the president cannot be prosecuted for official acts he engages in while in office. But this argument borders on frivolousness, and it would have had astonishing implications if the courts actually bought it which they did not.
The second, more important document that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed down Tuesday is a single-page judgment that effectively lays out the schedule for resuming Trumps federal prosecution for attempted election theft.
Its unlikely that either Trump or his lawyers actually thought the courts would rule that sitting presidents have a right to commit crimes. Instead, Trumps legal strategy is to delay his criminal trials as much as possible, in the hopes that he will be elected president before he is convicted and then can order the Justice Department to drop his federal prosecutions.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 496 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Millhiser: The Supreme Court is about to decide whether to sabotage Trump's election theft trial (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Feb 2024
OP
The odds he wins election again in my opinion are slim. Everything has to line up.
LiberalFighter
Feb 2024
#3
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,234 posts)1. Good read and article is not very long. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,234 posts)2. The one page
LiberalFighter
(51,958 posts)3. The odds he wins election again in my opinion are slim. Everything has to line up.
That means all the states he won last time he would need to come up with 32 additional electoral votes.
I don't think he will get Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan, or Nevada.
That leaves Georgia and Wisconsin with 26.
The possible states:
Arizona - 11
Georgia - 16
Michigan - 15
Nevada - 6
Pennsylvania - 19
Wisconsin - 10