General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChina is experimenting with turning coal into food
https://newatlas.com/science/coal-protein-feed/So the team set about research into processes that could use fossil fuels to produce proteins, building on oil-to-protein biotechnology pioneered by BP as far back as the 1960s.
The CAS team's process works something like this: firstly, coal is transformed into methanol via gasification a technique that can now be executed with near-zero carbon emissions. That methanol is then fed to a special strain of Pichia pastoris yeast, which ferments the methanol to produce a single-cell protein complete with a range of amino acids, vitamins, inorganic salts, fats and carbohydrates. The resulting organism is much richer in protein than plants are, and it can be used to partially replace fish, soybeans, meat and skimmed milk in a range of animal feeds.
I'm both intrigued and disgusted.
NJCher
(35,951 posts)had the same reaction here !
limbicnuminousity
(1,408 posts)It's a diversion from the fact that we need to rely more heavily on sustainable fuel and energy sources now.
Biologists can be weird. Harmless, but weird.
Walleye
(31,298 posts)madinmaryland
(64,936 posts)I dont know what the fuck it is!!
limbicnuminousity
(1,408 posts)As a person, it makes me squirm.
Icck.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Angleae
(4,518 posts)Wonder Why
(3,505 posts)Talitha
(6,707 posts)"The resulting organism is much richer in protein than plants are, and it can be used to partially replace fish, soybeans, meat and skimmed milk in a range of animal feeds."
And since it's "much richer in protein than plants are", maybe acreage now being used to grow fodder plants can be used to grow plants for us to eat. And it'll keep coal miners employed. Maybe it'll work out ok.
Bayard
(22,402 posts)jmowreader
(50,650 posts)On one hand, if they can make synthetic proteins out of coal that wouldnt be terrible.
On the other, China is famous for its attempts to screw with protein readings. So one does have to wonder how many ways people will try to abuse this.
Response to NickB79 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hugin
(33,321 posts)Isnt that what is currently done with cattle and methane?
:innocent look:
Ursus Rex
(159 posts)Our entire food production chain makes heavy use of fossil fuels, from planting and harvesting equipment, to fertilizers and other treatments, to the fuel that transports the products. This seems like it would just use more coal, albeit with potentially less pollution from burning it. It's still a finite resource with high extraction costs, though, and we should do everything we can to stay away from using it to produce consumables.